new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 places SOL-TT in an exit-oriented assessment rather than a marginal hold. The live verdict is EXIT: ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools indicates that many alternatives score better on the same venue, although rank alone is not a safety guarantee. The assessment would change if liquidity and trading volume grew persistently, fee generation improved, the scanner cleared its critical condition, and the pool established a credible lifecycle and range-history record; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$39.53K
Total value locked
$410.01
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -4.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL status and unopposed strong EXIT signal as the immediate exit trigger; only re-enter after live volume, liquidity, and price-range data show sustained improvement. Do not widen a range to compensate for missing range-history evidence, because that would increase exposure without evidence of fee generation.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $410.01 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.03 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-TT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12880 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18517 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-TT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TT into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You earn a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can become less valuable than simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart, and TT may be difficult to sell during a liquidity drain.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The return decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.7% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% means LPs are relying on organic trading fees, while the reward schedule and any remaining incentive duration are not established. With no reward contribution shown, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver; weak volume is.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range exposure are not reported, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the available data. SOL-TT belongs to the MEMECOIN family, where liquidity can leave quickly, price discovery can be discontinuous, and emission decay can remove support before trading fees replace it. The unknown lifecycle and unavailable persistence record make exit timing more dependent on live volume and liquidity conditions than on a demonstrated operating history.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and usually has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana. SOL price moves against TT change the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when the position remains active; the pool's limited apparent trading flow may not compensate for that divergence.
tollTT Context
TT is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other concentrated venues. A sharp TT move against SOL can materially alter the LP's holdings, while a loss of TT demand can reduce swaps, fees, and the ability to exit without price impact.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TT into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You earn a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can become less valuable than simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart, and TT may be difficult to sell during a liquidity drain.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CYMbv1bA6R33uWPFi58yMfatWqJXYkZA9DEP1EpA6sLH
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- TT (5dSW7m4E…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is shown as fee-only APR of 0.7% and reward-only APR of 0.0%, so the displayed APR is not presently dependent on rewards. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward component would fall without a corresponding increase in trading fees.
The current return is shown as fee-only APR of 0.7% and reward-only APR of 0.0%, so the displayed APR is not presently dependent on rewards. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward component would fall without a corresponding increase in trading fees.
Because reward duration is not established and the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, an expiry would mainly remove any remaining subsidy rather than cut an active reward stream shown in the current figures. The position would then depend on fee-only APR of 0.7% and whatever trading volume remains.
Because reward duration is not established and the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, an expiry would mainly remove any remaining subsidy rather than cut an active reward stream shown in the current figures. The position would then depend on fee-only APR of 0.7% and whatever trading volume remains.
The risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because TT can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to exit. Here, $40K and $410 indicate a small pool and limited recent activity, while the MEMECOIN classification adds emission-decay and rapid-exit risk.
The risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because TT can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to exit. Here, $40K and $410 indicate a small pool and limited recent activity, while the MEMECOIN classification adds emission-decay and rapid-exit risk.
For SOL-TT, the current EXIT and the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal are concrete reasons to exit rather than wait for a reward increase. Reconsider only after sustained improvement in liquidity, volume, fee generation, and the scanner assessment.
For SOL-TT, the current EXIT and the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal are concrete reasons to exit rather than wait for a reward increase. Reconsider only after sustained improvement in liquidity, volume, fee generation, and the scanner assessment.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's volume record is too limited to establish a stable fee run rate. At fee-only APR of 0.7%, fees would need to persist long enough to offset any SOL-TT price divergence, and a further TT move could extend or eliminate that recovery period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's volume record is too limited to establish a stable fee run rate. At fee-only APR of 0.7%, fees would need to persist long enough to offset any SOL-TT price divergence, and a further TT move could extend or eliminate that recovery period.
