new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-SLO below the Enter score of 15/100, the Hold score of 20/100, and the Exit score of 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That conclusion reflects a conflict between ai_engine=hold and scanner=CRITICAL, with the scanner's strong EXIT signal marked unopposed. The pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so its position is weak relative to the tracked pool set. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume growth, stronger fee generation, deeper TVL, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-25 22:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.26K
Total value locked
$103.52
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the current EXIT as the entry and monitoring rule: do not add liquidity while the scanner remains CRITICAL and the volume-to-liquidity reading remains 0.00x. If already providing liquidity, use a narrow range only with a predefined rebalance plan and exit when the scanner's unopposed EXIT signal persists or trading activity weakens further.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $103.52 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.26 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-SLO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2496 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5591 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SLO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SLO into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of its trading fees. In return, your holdings can shift toward whichever token performs worse, and the current fee-based return may not compensate for that price risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.7% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the stated return depends on trading fees rather than emissions. Reward dependency is unknown, and no reward-duration estimate is available; any future emissions could alter the mix without establishing durable fee demand.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss reporting and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so price divergence and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied history. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SLO is exposed to sharp SLO repricing, thin exit liquidity, and rapid changes in trading activity. Emission decay is an additional timing risk if incentives appear later: an LP should not assume that any future reward schedule will persist, and should define an exit point before liquidity or attention fades.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than SLO. If SOL moves sharply while SLO does not, the pool rebalances toward the weaker relative asset, creating inventory drift and potential impermanent loss for the LP. SOL price action therefore affects both the dollar value of the position and the pair's relative-price range.
tollSLO Context
SLO is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A rapid SLO rally can leave the LP with less SLO exposure after arbitrage, while a sharp decline can increase SLO inventory and reduce the position's value. Thin SLO liquidity can also make exits more price-sensitive than the displayed APR suggests.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SLO into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of its trading fees. In return, your holdings can shift toward whichever token performs worse, and the current fee-based return may not compensate for that price risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CcS6uid2NsZNNJJaxxMRjQARE98QBZqC7WRvBdXLcxqW
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SLO (E43qU77t…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
10%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
177%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated APR is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component could fall without any improvement in trading-fee demand; fee sustainability is 100%.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated APR is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component could fall without any improvement in trading-fee demand; fee sustainability is 100%.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not currently remove a recorded reward stream, but future emissions could still change the economics. After expiry, LP return would depend primarily on trading fees, currently represented by 0.7%.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not currently remove a recorded reward stream, but future emissions could still change the economics. After expiry, LP return would depend primarily on trading fees, currently represented by 0.7%.
Risk is elevated because SLO can move sharply, liquidity can become difficult to exit, and the pool's activity is limited relative to its liquidity at 0.00x. SOL's deeper external liquidity does not remove the risk of accumulating SLO during a decline or losing SLO exposure during a rally.
Risk is elevated because SLO can move sharply, liquidity can become difficult to exit, and the pool's activity is limited relative to its liquidity at 0.00x. SOL's deeper external liquidity does not remove the risk of accumulating SLO during a decline or losing SLO exposure during a rally.
For SOL-SLO, a practical exit condition is persistence of the current EXIT while the scanner remains CRITICAL and its strong EXIT signal remains unopposed. Also exit or reduce exposure if pool liquidity drains, trading activity deteriorates, or a future emission schedule falls without a corresponding increase in fee generation.
For SOL-SLO, a practical exit condition is persistence of the current EXIT while the scanner remains CRITICAL and its strong EXIT signal remains unopposed. Also exit or reduce exposure if pool liquidity drains, trading activity deteriorates, or a future emission schedule falls without a corresponding increase in fee generation.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-use history are unavailable. Even with a total APR of 0.7%, fee accrual is path-dependent and may not offset losses caused by SOL-SLO price divergence, especially at 0.00x trading volume relative to liquidity.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-use history are unavailable. Even with a total APR of 0.7%, fee accrual is path-dependent and may not offset losses caused by SOL-SLO price divergence, especially at 0.00x trading volume relative to liquidity.
