new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 48/100 assigns Enter 42/100, Hold 56/100, and Exit 24/100, with the live verdict at HOLD and ai_engine=hold as the stated verdict driver. Its rank of #409 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools, but that ranking does not remove the specific constraints of $28K, 0.15x, and memecoin volatility. The hold assessment would change if TVL drained materially, fee income collapsed, NOS liquidity deteriorated, or sustained volume improved enough to support deeper execution without relying on incentives.
Computed 2026-09-06 20:56 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$28.17K
Total value locked
$4.13K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up10.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 7.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position: rebalance when the position leaves its selected tick range, and set an exit rule for a sustained deterioration in 0.15x or a visible drain from $28K. Since the current return is fee-funded, withdraw if trading activity no longer compensates for NOS price exposure and execution risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 10.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 10.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $4.13K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $10.33 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 NOS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#956 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2329 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NOS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of NOS and USDC you own can change as NOS moves, and withdrawing during a sharp move can leave you with a different result than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 10.0% from trading fees and 0.5% from rewards. With fee sustainability at 95%, the current return depends on trading activity rather than an incentive stream. Because the reward component is absent, emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed APR; future APR will still vary with volume, liquidity, and fee competition across raydium-amm pools.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity inside the active tick range are not reported, so fee income cannot be compared with observed IL or range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, NOS-USDC is exposed to sharp NOS price moves, one-sided inventory accumulation, and liquidity exits during sentiment reversals. The pool's reward and lifecycle status are not established, so an LP should treat exit timing as dependent on NOS volatility, available depth, and sustained swap activity rather than on a known incentive schedule.
tollNOS Context
NOS is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC provides the quote side. Liquidity depth for NOS outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp NOS move can therefore create greater price impact and leave the LP holding a larger NOS share after arbitrage. NOS appreciation or depreciation relative to USDC changes the pool's inventory mix and can produce impermanent loss relative to simply holding both assets.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the dollar-denominated side of the pair and normally serves as the less volatile inventory component. Its broader market liquidity can support valuation and rebalancing, but it does not remove the pool-specific risks created by shallow NOS-USDC depth. When NOS falls, the LP generally accumulates more NOS and less USDC; when NOS rises, the reverse occurs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of NOS and USDC you own can change as NOS moves, and withdrawing during a sharp move can leave you with a different result than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Cj7kD2VmzwSrwKBieuYYbjPEvr8gwhNi76KUESbGDNfF
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- NOS (nosXBVoa…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
48%
APR
126%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.5%, so the displayed 10.5% is currently fee-driven rather than dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could reduce that reward portion while 10.0% would still depend on trading volume and pool liquidity.
The current reward component is 0.5%, so the displayed 10.5% is currently fee-driven rather than dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could reduce that reward portion while 10.0% would still depend on trading volume and pool liquidity.
Because 0.5% is currently zero, expiration of a farm incentive would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed APR. The remaining return would be 10.0%, which can fall if incentives had been supporting trading activity or liquidity.
Because 0.5% is currently zero, expiration of a farm incentive would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed APR. The remaining return would be 10.0%, which can fall if incentives had been supporting trading activity or liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin or major-token pool because NOS can move sharply and the pool has $28K with a 0.15x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Fee income is 95% sustainable in the sense that it comes from trading fees, but fees do not protect against NOS price losses, impermanent loss, or difficulty exiting shallow liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin or major-token pool because NOS can move sharply and the pool has $28K with a 0.15x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Fee income is 95% sustainable in the sense that it comes from trading fees, but fees do not protect against NOS price losses, impermanent loss, or difficulty exiting shallow liquidity.
For this pool, consider exiting when NOS volatility rises beyond your tolerance, when $28K shows a sustained drain, or when 0.15x weakens enough that fee income no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. A loss of reliable depth is a more relevant exit signal than the headline 10.5% alone.
For this pool, consider exiting when NOS volatility rises beyond your tolerance, when $28K shows a sustained drain, or when 0.15x weakens enough that fee income no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. A loss of reliable depth is a more relevant exit signal than the headline 10.5% alone.
A break-even period cannot be calculated reliably from 10.0% because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization data are not reported, and fee income changes with volume. In a memecoin pool, a single large NOS move can outweigh an extended period of fees, so break-even is conditional rather than assured.
A break-even period cannot be calculated reliably from 10.0% because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization data are not reported, and fee income changes with volume. In a memecoin pool, a single large NOS move can outweigh an extended period of fees, so break-even is conditional rather than assured.
