Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 58% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 gives this pool a AVOID verdict, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100. Its rank of #718 of 24532 raydium-amm pools places it above most listed pools by that score, but the automated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold rather than a demonstrated reward advantage: 7.3% is entirely fee-based, $35K is limited, and 0.06x shows modest turnover relative to liquidity. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell further, or fee income collapsed; sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity would improve the case.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.25K
Total value locked
$2.04K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up7.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 10.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Before entering, use a full-range position or the broadest available range because tick-in-range history is unavailable, and set a precommitted exit trigger for when displayed TVL falls materially below $35K or fee income no longer compensates for NOS exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 7.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 7.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.04K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.10 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 NOS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2409 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5361 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NOS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If NOS moves sharply against USDC, the pool can leave you with more of the weaker asset and your result can be worse than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 7.1% from trading fees and 0.3% from rewards. 97% of the stated yield comes from fees, while the reward schedule and its dependency on future emissions are not established; any reward change would therefore alter the total APR without a current reward-based cushion.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range data is also unavailable, so recent range behavior cannot be quantified. NOS is a memecoin, making price divergence, shallow liquidity, and abrupt exit demand central risks; emission decay is not currently represented in the yield, but any future incentive program would require monitoring its end date and exiting before fee income alone no longer justifies the position.
tollNOS Context
NOS is the volatile side of this pool and functions as the primary source of directional and divergence risk for the LP. The available data does not establish NOS liquidity depth elsewhere, so a sharp NOS move can produce adverse inventory changes and make the pool's $35K especially important when assessing exit conditions.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the dollar-denominated quote asset and generally provides the stable side of the pair. USDC has broader liquidity across Solana markets than a single NOS pool, but USDC's relative stability means most price-driven impermanent-loss exposure here comes from NOS moving against USDC rather than from both assets moving together.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If NOS moves sharply against USDC, the pool can leave you with more of the weaker asset and your result can be worse than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Cj7kD2VmzwSrwKBieuYYbjPEvr8gwhNi76KUESbGDNfF
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- NOS (nosXBVoa…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.3%, so the stated 7.3% is presently fee-based rather than dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward contribution is 0.3%, so the stated 7.3% is presently fee-based rather than dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The available data does not establish a current reward schedule, and 0.3% is the stated reward component. If incentives are added and then expire, the total APR would move toward 7.1%, leaving trading fees as the remaining income source.
The available data does not establish a current reward schedule, and 0.3% is the stated reward component. If incentives are added and then expire, the total APR would move toward 7.1%, leaving trading fees as the remaining income source.
Risk is elevated because NOS can move sharply against USDC and the pool has TVL of $35K with a 0.06x volume-to-liquidity ratio. This can create adverse inventory changes, price impact during exits, and losses relative to holding NOS and USDC separately.
Risk is elevated because NOS can move sharply against USDC and the pool has TVL of $35K with a 0.06x volume-to-liquidity ratio. This can create adverse inventory changes, price impact during exits, and losses relative to holding NOS and USDC separately.
Set the decision before entry and exit if TVL falls materially below $35K, fee income declines from 7.1%, or NOS volatility makes the remaining position inconsistent with your risk limit. Do not rely on rewards to justify staying because 0.3% is the stated reward component.
Set the decision before entry and exit if TVL falls materially below $35K, fee income declines from 7.1%, or NOS volatility makes the remaining position inconsistent with your risk limit. Do not rely on rewards to justify staying because 0.3% is the stated reward component.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. The relevant inputs are future fees near 7.1%, the pool's 0.06x, and how far NOS diverges from USDC.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. The relevant inputs are future fees near 7.1%, the pool's 0.06x, and how far NOS diverges from USDC.
