new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 44/100, with Enter at 38/100, Hold at 52/100, and Exit at 28/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the automated verdict driver is hold. Its position at #171 of 889 meteora-damm-v2 pools places it above most ranked pools, but the score does not establish low risk: the pool combines fee-only yield with memecoin volatility and limited stated history for loss and range behavior. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell enough to collapse 1.9%, or an incentive program introduced short-lived emission-dependent yield; it would improve if fee activity persisted while liquidity deepened.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$11.11K
Total value locked
$412.84
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: withdraw if pool liquidity falls materially from $11K or if fee generation no longer supports 1.9% after a sustained volume decline; keep the range narrow enough to earn fees but wide enough to avoid frequent out-of-range exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $412.84 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.83 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-nUSD pools
by AI Farmer Score
#519 of 2467 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8996 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-nUSD liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NUSD into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 1.9%, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that falls in value, especially during a sharp SOL move.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR is 1.9%, decomposed into 1.9% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return does not rely on an active incentive program; any change in trading volume or fee capture will therefore affect the APR directly. Reward duration is not established, and the reported reward contribution is zero.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-in-range coverage are not reported, so realized divergence loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-NUSD carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-timing risk; fee income may not offset losses when SOL and NUSD diverge rapidly. Any future emissions would also be subject to decay, making early exit or reassessment necessary if incentives replace trading activity as the rationale for providing liquidity.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the volatile side of this pool and has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool alone. For an LP, a sharp SOL move against NUSD can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while SOL's external liquidity may make rebalancing or exiting easier than the pool's own depth suggests.
tollnUSD Context
NUSD is intended to provide the dollar-linked side of the pair, so its stability is central to the pool's pricing behavior. If NUSD holds its reference value, most divergence risk comes from SOL; any NUSD depeg or liquidity deterioration would add a second source of inventory and exit risk.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NUSD into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 1.9%, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that falls in value, especially during a sharp SOL move.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CmcXtYgmHzdmoRdKRiszkNVqAfqEZCx9RPqhMUeBitNU
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- nUSD (BKvheJ3s…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
4%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current pool return is 1.9%, made up of 1.9% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is zero, emission decay is not currently the source of APR, but any future emissions would likely decline over time and should not be treated as permanent yield.
The current pool return is 1.9%, made up of 1.9% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is zero, emission decay is not currently the source of APR, but any future emissions would likely decline over time and should not be treated as permanent yield.
There is no reported reward contribution to remove from the current 1.9%; 99% comes from trading fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on 1.9% and could fall sharply if incentive-driven volume also disappears.
There is no reported reward contribution to remove from the current 1.9%; 99% comes from trading fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on 1.9% and could fall sharply if incentive-driven volume also disappears.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because SOL can move sharply and memecoin liquidity can leave quickly. This pool has $11K in liquidity and volume of $413, while recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy history is not reported, so loss severity cannot be estimated from those fields.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because SOL can move sharply and memecoin liquidity can leave quickly. This pool has $11K in liquidity and volume of $413, while recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy history is not reported, so loss severity cannot be estimated from those fields.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a recovery: consider exiting if liquidity falls materially below $11K, fee income no longer supports 1.9%, or SOL and NUSD begin diverging in a way that pushes the position outside its intended range. An incentive program with declining emissions is another reason to reassess before rewards fade.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a recovery: consider exiting if liquidity falls materially below $11K, fee income no longer supports 1.9%, or SOL and NUSD begin diverging in a way that pushes the position outside its intended range. An incentive program with declining emissions is another reason to reassess before rewards fade.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not reported. At 1.9% in annualized fee income, break-even depends on the size and duration of SOL-NUSD divergence, future volume, and whether the position remains in range.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not reported. At 1.9% in annualized fee income, break-even depends on the size and duration of SOL-NUSD divergence, future volume, and whether the position remains in range.
