Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 places SOL-AU79 below the Enter threshold of 10/100, the Hold threshold of 30/100, and the Exit threshold of 60/100; its live verdict is AVOID. Ranked #602 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, it is assessed as high risk at 76/100 with weak yield, despite the fee-funded structure. The assessment would improve if TVL and organic volume increased enough to support fees, while a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or a collapse in fee yield would make the position materially weaker.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$133.19K
Total value locked
$5.35K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up6.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -38.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range centered on the current SOL/AU79 price, rebalance when price leaves that range, and exit rather than widen the range if AU79 liquidity deteriorates or fee generation no longer offsets the added inventory risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 6.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 5.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.35K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $53.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-AU79 pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1988 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4470 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AU79 liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AU79 into a shared pool that other traders use, in exchange for a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other, and the position may be difficult to close quickly if AU79 activity or liquidity falls.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 5.9% from trading fees and 0.2% from rewards, with 97%. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component should be treated as the only confirmed source of yield. As a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions would be subject to decay and could change the APR without a corresponding increase in organic volume.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so neither realized divergence loss nor range utilization can be assessed from the supplied data. The MEMECOIN classification adds token-price, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-timing risk: emission decay can reduce support for the position, while a rapid fall in AU79 liquidity can make closing the position costly. The low activity implied by 0.04x increases the importance of monitoring exit liquidity rather than relying on headline APR.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against AU79 and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than this pool. A rise in SOL relative to AU79 can create divergence between the deposited assets and leave the LP holding a different mix than initially supplied, while SOL weakness can amplify the pool's exposure to AU79-specific liquidity risk.
tollAU79 Context
AU79 is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and liquidity are likely more concentrated than SOL's. A sharp AU79 move can increase impermanent loss, while a decline in AU79 trading activity can reduce fee generation and make timely exit more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AU79 into a shared pool that other traders use, in exchange for a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other, and the position may be difficult to close quickly if AU79 activity or liquidity falls.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CqmwcyB7fGor8z7As56yXBQzWjy7MnACtmj6wuLHgV5H
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AU79 (AT13ipG8…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The confirmed APR is split between 5.9% in fees and 0.2% in rewards, with 97%. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward component can decay independently, leaving fee income tied to the pool's 0.04x trading activity.
The confirmed APR is split between 5.9% in fees and 0.2% in rewards, with 97%. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward component can decay independently, leaving fee income tied to the pool's 0.04x trading activity.
Because 0.2% is the current reward component, expiration would not remove the confirmed fee component of 5.9%. It would remove any temporary support for liquidity, making the pool's weak organic activity and exit liquidity more important.
Because 0.2% is the current reward component, expiration would not remove the confirmed fee component of 5.9%. It would remove any temporary support for liquidity, making the pool's weak organic activity and exit liquidity more important.
SOL-AU79 carries elevated risk because AU79 can move sharply or lose liquidity while SOL remains actively traded elsewhere. The pool has $133K TVL, $5K in recent volume, and a risk score of 76/100, so impermanent loss and exit slippage can matter more than the fee APR.
SOL-AU79 carries elevated risk because AU79 can move sharply or lose liquidity while SOL remains actively traded elsewhere. The pool has $133K TVL, $5K in recent volume, and a risk score of 76/100, so impermanent loss and exit slippage can matter more than the fee APR.
For SOL-AU79, an exit is more defensible when AU79 liquidity contracts, fee generation falls, or the SOL/AU79 price leaves the chosen range and cannot be recentered without taking excessive exposure. The live verdict is AVOID, so a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
For SOL-AU79, an exit is more defensible when AU79 liquidity contracts, fee generation falls, or the SOL/AU79 price leaves the chosen range and cannot be recentered without taking excessive exposure. The live verdict is AVOID, so a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. Break-even depends on whether fee income of 5.9% persists and exceeds realized divergence loss, which is uncertain given 0.04x activity.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. Break-even depends on whether fee income of 5.9% persists and exceeds realized divergence loss, which is uncertain given 0.04x activity.
