Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 places this pool in a middling risk-adjusted position, while Enter 10/100 / Hold 30/100 / Exit 60/100 supports holding an existing position rather than adding aggressively. The live verdict is AVOID, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #633 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls enough to reduce fee generation, or the fee-derived APR collapses; it would improve only with sustained liquidity, activity, and clearer evidence that price divergence is being compensated by fees.
Computed 2026-11-05 03:07 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$19.55K
Total value locked
$577.91
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 8.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Record the pool's TVL and volume at entry, then reduce or exit if TVL falls to half of that entry reading for two consecutive daily observations; this is more actionable here than relying on an unavailable tick-range history.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $577.91 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.44 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 TURBO-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12215 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #17665 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the TURBO-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing TURBO and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of the asset that performed worse, and the small pool size means withdrawals or lower trading activity can affect results quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 2.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of the stated yield coming from fees. Reward dependency and the pool's lifecycle are not established, so the durability of any reward component cannot be assessed; the fee component depends on continued volume and retained liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable, so recent divergence between TURBO and SOL cannot be quantified through N/A. Tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable through N/A, and this raydium-amm pool should not be treated as having a documented range-management history. As a MEMECOIN pool, TURBO can experience sharp price moves and liquidity withdrawals; emission decay and exit timing cannot be assessed without a documented incentive schedule, so an LP should define an exit rule before entering.
tollTURBO Context
TURBO is the memecoin leg of this pair, so providing liquidity means holding indirect exposure to TURBO alongside SOL rather than simply holding either asset. TURBO's liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; a sharp TURBO move against SOL can create impermanent loss and leave the LP with a larger share of the weaker-performing asset.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base-asset leg and generally has broader market liquidity than a memecoin, but this pool's metrics do not establish how much SOL-side liquidity exists elsewhere for TURBO. SOL price movement affects the pair's relative balance: sustained divergence from TURBO can increase impermanent loss even when fee income continues.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing TURBO and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of the asset that performed worse, and the small pool size means withdrawals or lower trading activity can affect results quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Cv8iUHVG15a9juFbmJqZNXHLvWYKnvXQygEoCiL88Z74
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- TURBO (2Dyzu65Q…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce the reward portion, 0.0%, but the stated Total APR of 2.4% is derived from 2.3% in fees and 99% fee sustainability. The reward schedule and lifecycle are not established, so the timing of any decay cannot be quantified.
Emission decay would reduce the reward portion, 0.0%, but the stated Total APR of 2.4% is derived from 2.3% in fees and 99% fee sustainability. The reward schedule and lifecycle are not established, so the timing of any decay cannot be quantified.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and the pool's remaining yield would depend on 2.3% from trading fees. Because the stated fee sustainability is 99%, continued volume is the key condition for preserving the fee-based portion of 2.4%.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and the pool's remaining yield would depend on 2.3% from trading fees. Because the stated fee sustainability is 99%, continued volume is the key condition for preserving the fee-based portion of 2.4%.
The main risks are TURBO's sharp price movements, divergence from SOL, and limited liquidity, with TVL at $20K. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the pool does not provide enough history to estimate how often those risks have affected LPs.
The main risks are TURBO's sharp price movements, divergence from SOL, and limited liquidity, with TVL at $20K. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the pool does not provide enough history to estimate how often those risks have affected LPs.
For this pool, use a pre-set TVL and activity rule rather than waiting for a reward change: reduce or exit after a sustained TVL drain, a material decline in trading volume, or a TURBO move that leaves the position heavily concentrated in TURBO. A half-entry-TVL drawdown lasting two daily observations is one concrete trigger.
For this pool, use a pre-set TVL and activity rule rather than waiting for a reward change: reduce or exit after a sustained TVL drain, a material decline in trading volume, or a TURBO move that leaves the position heavily concentrated in TURBO. A half-entry-TVL drawdown lasting two daily observations is one concrete trigger.
There is no defensible break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future TURBO-SOL divergence is unknown. Fee income is represented by 2.3%, but whether it offsets impermanent loss depends on realized price movement, volume, and the time the position remains open.
There is no defensible break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future TURBO-SOL divergence is unknown. Fee income is represented by 2.3%, but whether it offsets impermanent loss depends on realized price movement, volume, and the time the position remains open.
