new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, producing a live verdict of EXIT. That outcome is consistent with ai_engine=hold but scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal: the pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, while its low activity provides little evidence that fees can compensate for memecoin and liquidity risk. The assessment would improve if sustained trading volume rose, TVL stabilized, and the scanner no longer produced a critical unopposed exit signal; it would worsen with a TVL drain, further volume collapse, or any yield reduction.
Computed 2026-10-23 05:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$44.34K
Total value locked
$66.12
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
For an LP entering despite the current profile, set a review-based exit trigger: leave if the scanner remains CRITICAL while volume-to-liquidity stays at or below 0.00x, or if pool TVL begins draining. Do not widen a concentrated range to compensate for missing activity; re-enter only after observable volume and liquidity improvement.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $66.12 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.17 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-OPK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15891 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-OPK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPK into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become more exposed to the token that falls in price, and the pool may be difficult to exit when trading is sparse.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-OPK decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.4% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of the yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward contribution to offset weak swap activity. Reward duration is not established, and emission decay or incentive changes should not be treated as a source of predictable return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and time-in-range data are unavailable, so realized price-divergence risk and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, OPK can experience abrupt repricing, shallow exit liquidity, and rapid fee deterioration; emission decay or incentive withdrawal can reduce the rationale for staying in the position, making exit timing more important than waiting for a recovery.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than OPK. That external liquidity can make SOL easier to trade, but SOL price moves against OPK still change the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for the LP.
tollOPK Context
OPK is the less liquid memecoin side of the pair and is likely to dominate the pool's idiosyncratic risk. A sharp OPK move, stalled market, or widening exit cost can alter the LP's asset exposure even when SOL remains liquid elsewhere.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPK into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become more exposed to the token that falls in price, and the pool may be difficult to exit when trading is sparse.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CxPMv68e8K299BW9V1gzev5DV2vAQ1vVZHpdvqmbABSL
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- OPK (5WGkdemJ…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current yield is split between fee-only APR of 0.4% and reward-only APR of 0.0%, with 100% coming from fees. Because the reward contribution is currently absent, emission decay would mainly remove any future incentive rather than reduce an existing reward stream.
The current yield is split between fee-only APR of 0.4% and reward-only APR of 0.0%, with 100% coming from fees. Because the reward contribution is currently absent, emission decay would mainly remove any future incentive rather than reduce an existing reward stream.
The reward-only component would remain at 0.0% unless incentives are introduced again, leaving fees as the yield source. With volume-to-liquidity at 0.00x, fee income may not be sufficient to justify the memecoin and exit-liquidity risks.
The reward-only component would remain at 0.0% unless incentives are introduced again, leaving fees as the yield source. With volume-to-liquidity at 0.00x, fee income may not be sufficient to justify the memecoin and exit-liquidity risks.
Risk is elevated because OPK can move sharply against SOL, trading activity can disappear, and external liquidity is much stronger for SOL than for OPK. This pool also has a critical scanner signal and no measurable recent impermanent-loss or range-history record to reduce uncertainty.
Risk is elevated because OPK can move sharply against SOL, trading activity can disappear, and external liquidity is much stronger for SOL than for OPK. This pool also has a critical scanner signal and no measurable recent impermanent-loss or range-history record to reduce uncertainty.
For SOL-OPK, an exit is most defensible when the critical scanner signal persists, the pool's TVL drains, or volume-to-liquidity fails to improve from 0.00x. Waiting for emissions is not a strong basis for remaining because current rewards contribute 0.0%.
For SOL-OPK, an exit is most defensible when the critical scanner signal persists, the pool's TVL drains, or volume-to-liquidity fails to improve from 0.00x. Waiting for emissions is not a strong basis for remaining because current rewards contribute 0.0%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading activity is very limited. The fee-only APR of 0.4% provides the relevant recovery rate, but actual break-even depends on future volume, SOL-OPK price divergence, and exit liquidity.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading activity is very limited. The fee-only APR of 0.4% provides the relevant recovery rate, but actual break-even depends on future volume, SOL-OPK price divergence, and exit liquidity.
