

SPCX-SPCXxon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $98.52K
- APR
- 14.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $385.38K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- DUzBLHZ5…TJro · observed 2026-08-24
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT despite ai_engine=hold because scanner=CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1202 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools indicates a materially weaker position than many protocol alternatives, although rank alone does not measure token-specific tail risk. The assessment would improve if sustained trading volume increased fee generation, TVL and range utilization became more durable, and the scanner no longer produced a critical signal; a TVL drain or collapse in fee yield would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-24 19:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$98.52K
Total value locked
$385.38K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up14.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 18.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately limited tick range and set a hard review or exit trigger if the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or pool TVL materially drains; do not rely on rewards to justify holding outside the active range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 14.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 13.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $385.38K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $38.60 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SPCX-SPCXx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#274 of 13158 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1505 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SPCX-SPCXx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPCX and SPCXX into a price band so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If either token moves sharply, your deposit can end up holding more of the weaker asset, and the fees may not cover that loss.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 13.6% fee APR and 1.0% reward APR. 93% of the reported yield comes from trading fees, while reward-dependency duration is not established for this pool. If emissions change or cease, the fee component is the relevant remaining source of LP income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so realized price divergence and range utilization cannot be validated from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SPCX-SPCXX carries emission-decay risk, rapid price-dislocation risk, and exit-timing risk; an LP may need to leave before fees compensate for a sharp move in either token. The absence of confirmed reward duration adds uncertainty to planning.
tollSPCX Context
SPCX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity market and determines part of the inventory an LP holds as price moves. Available pool data does not establish SPCX's liquidity depth elsewhere, so this pool should not be assumed to have deep external exit liquidity. A sharp SPCX move can convert the position toward one-sided SPCX or SPCXX exposure and increase rebalancing pressure.
tollSPCXx Context
SPCXX is the other side of the pair and provides the counter-asset against which SPCX is priced. Available pool data does not establish SPCXX's liquidity depth elsewhere, making broader market exit conditions uncertain. A sharp SPCXX move can similarly push the LP position toward concentrated exposure to one token and make the fee income insufficient relative to price loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPCX and SPCXX into a price band so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If either token moves sharply, your deposit can end up holding more of the weaker asset, and the fees may not cover that loss.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DUzBLHZ5RZdftPuWVijsvjupndogRM1adGJpsR7YTJro
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SPCX (SPCXxcqX…)
- Token B
- SPCXx (Xs3oZwbH…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently reports 1.0% reward APR and 13.6% fee APR, with 93% of yield from trading fees. Any reduction in emissions would mainly remove the reward component; the fee component depends on continued trading activity.
The pool currently reports 1.0% reward APR and 13.6% fee APR, with 93% of yield from trading fees. Any reduction in emissions would mainly remove the reward component; the fee component depends on continued trading activity.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the relevant income source. Because the pool already reports 93% fee sustainability, its post-incentive economics should be judged against 13.6% and the ongoing volume supporting it.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the relevant income source. Because the pool already reports 93% fee sustainability, its post-incentive economics should be judged against 13.6% and the ongoing volume supporting it.
Risk is high because memecoin prices can move abruptly, liquidity can contract, and an LP can become concentrated in the falling token. This pool has $99K TVL, a 3.91x Vol/TVL ratio, and a live verdict of EXIT; its recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history cannot be verified from the available metrics.
Risk is high because memecoin prices can move abruptly, liquidity can contract, and an LP can become concentrated in the falling token. This pool has $99K TVL, a 3.91x Vol/TVL ratio, and a live verdict of EXIT; its recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history cannot be verified from the available metrics.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the live verdict remains EXIT, TVL drains, or fee generation no longer compensates for price and range risk. Reassess before emission changes rather than waiting for rewards to disappear.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the live verdict remains EXIT, TVL drains, or fee generation no longer compensates for price and range risk. Reassess before emission changes rather than waiting for rewards to disappear.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The reported fee income is 13.6%, so break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether SPCX-SPCXX experiences further price divergence.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The reported fee income is 13.6%, so break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether SPCX-SPCXX experiences further price divergence.




