SPCX-SPCXxon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $253.20K
- APR
- 9.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $545.90K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- DUzBLHZ5…TJro · observed 2026-10-17
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 places this pool near the middle of the assessed set, with Enter at 44/100, Hold at 56/100, and Exit at 25/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1462 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools. In practical terms, that is a monitor-and-hold assessment rather than a strong entry signal: the fee-only structure and high activity relative to TVL are meaningful, but memecoin price risk and uncertain persistence limit conviction. A sustained TVL drain, a collapse in trading volume or fee APR, or evidence that liquidity is frequently out of range would change the assessment toward exit; durable volume and stable liquidity would support the current verdict.
Computed 2026-10-17 03:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$253.20K
Total value locked
$545.90K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up9.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 10.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded range around the current SPCX/SPCXX price and rebalance when price reaches either boundary; exit rather than widen the range if volume falls materially below the level implied by 2.16x or if fee income no longer supports 9.1%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 9.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 8.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $545.90K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $54.71 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 8 SPCX-SPCXx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#315 of 19049 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1981 of 144458
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SPCX-SPCXx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPCX and SPCXX into a smart contract that lets traders swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token, and your position may stop earning fees if the price leaves your chosen range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported APR decomposes into 8.7% from trading fees and 0.4% from rewards. 96% of yield comes from fees, so current returns do not depend on an active reward allocation. Because the pool is in the MEMECOIN family, any future emissions should be treated as temporary support rather than a durable component of LP economics; the reward schedule and remaining duration are not established here.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from this data. The main family-specific risk is memecoin emission decay and exit timing: even fee income can fall quickly if attention, trading volume, or liquidity leaves the pair, while concentrated liquidity can become inactive after price moves outside the selected range. LPs should therefore treat the current fee rate as conditional on continued trading activity rather than as a fixed return.
tollSPCX Context
SPCX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so its price movement relative to SPCXX determines whether the position remains active and how much inventory is held in each token. Liquidity depth for SPCX elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool data; a sharp SPCX move can create impermanent loss and leave the LP increasingly exposed to the weaker side of the pair.
tollSPCXx Context
SPCXX is the other side of the pair and serves as the relative-price reference against which SPCX exposure changes. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so abrupt SPCXX price action can move the position out of range, reduce fee participation, and alter the LP's token composition.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPCX and SPCXX into a smart contract that lets traders swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token, and your position may stop earning fees if the price leaves your chosen range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DUzBLHZ5RZdftPuWVijsvjupndogRM1adGJpsR7YTJro
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SPCX (SPCXxcqX…)
- Token B
- SPCXx (Xs3oZwbH…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current rewards contribute 0.4%, while fees contribute 8.7% and 96% of yield comes from trading fees. Emission decay therefore has little current effect on the reported 9.1%, but future incentives could change the mix if they are introduced.
Current rewards contribute 0.4%, while fees contribute 8.7% and 96% of yield comes from trading fees. Emission decay therefore has little current effect on the reported 9.1%, but future incentives could change the mix if they are introduced.
The current reward component is 0.4%, so there is no reported reward APR to remove at present. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, which are represented by 8.7% and depend on volume staying high relative to $253K.
The current reward component is 0.4%, so there is no reported reward APR to remove at present. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, which are represented by 8.7% and depend on volume staying high relative to $253K.
The pool has $253K in liquidity and 2.16x volume relative to TVL, but memecoin prices can move abruptly and create impermanent loss or push liquidity out of range. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history are not available, so recent realized range and loss behavior cannot be quantified.
The pool has $253K in liquidity and 2.16x volume relative to TVL, but memecoin prices can move abruptly and create impermanent loss or push liquidity out of range. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history are not available, so recent realized range and loss behavior cannot be quantified.
Consider exiting when trading volume or fee income falls enough that 9.1% is no longer justified, when TVL is draining, or when price reaches the edge of your range and the underlying token risk has changed. A sharp move in either SPCX or SPCXX is also a reason to reassess rather than automatically widen the range.
Consider exiting when trading volume or fee income falls enough that 9.1% is no longer justified, when TVL is draining, or when price reaches the edge of your range and the underlying token risk has changed. A sharp move in either SPCX or SPCXX is also a reason to reassess rather than automatically widen the range.
A realistic break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee persistence is uncertain. The theoretical income rate is 8.7% from fees, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price divergence, range placement, and whether the position remains active.
A realistic break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee persistence is uncertain. The theoretical income rate is 8.7% from fees, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price divergence, range placement, and whether the position remains active.
