WealthVille
SOL
S
BUCK
B

SOL-BUCKon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $178.75K
APR
3.1% APR
24h Volume
$1.60K 24h vol
Pool address
Dgos4PkM1iC9 · observed 2026-09-19
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-BUCK below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while its Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank is #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so this is not merely a comparison against memecoin pools. The assessment could change with sustained volume growth, deeper and more persistent liquidity, a nonzero fee-backed return that remains stable, or removal of the critical scanner signal; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce it.

Computed 2026-09-19 06:15 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$178.75K

Total value locked

$1.60K

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

3.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

-2.7%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 336m agoTVL 6.6%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 82/100
tips_and_updates

Enter only with a range centered on the current SOL/BUCK price, and rebalance or exit when price leaves that range or when the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal remains in place; do not wait for fee income to offset a sharp memecoin repricing.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR3.1%
Fee APR3.0%
Volume$1.60K
Fees Earned$4.01

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
1.8%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−4.5%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-2.7%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.01x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 SOL-BUCK pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#2226 of 69219 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 5% of all Solana pools

overall rank #5241 of 118991

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-BUCK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BUCK into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and worth less than simply holding both coins.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The yield consists of 3.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry horizon is available; the current return therefore depends on continued swap fees rather than an identified emissions schedule.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range utilization are not reported, so recent price-path loss and range exposure cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-BUCK is exposed to sharp SOL/BUCK divergence, thin or shifting liquidity, and emission decay if incentives appear later; exit timing matters because fee income may not compensate for a rapid repricing or liquidity withdrawal.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. If SOL rises against BUCK, arbitrage tends to leave the LP with less SOL and more BUCK, creating underperformance versus simply holding the two assets when the relative move persists.

tollBUCK Context

BUCK is the memecoin leg, so its usable liquidity is more dependent on specific venues and pools than SOL's. If BUCK rises against SOL, the pool tends to sell BUCK into that move; if BUCK loses liquidity or value, the LP can retain a larger exposure to the weakening asset.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BUCK into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and worth less than simply holding both coins.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

BUCK
BUCKGME MASCOTSolana
Explorer

GME MASCOT (BUCK) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
Dgos4PkM2NxdxaJAFtkhpo3nRZUsTbQDD5E47zTK1iC9
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
BUCK (FLqmVrv6…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 3.0% to the 3.1% total. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall first; the remaining return would depend on trading fees and 99%.

The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 3.0% to the 3.1% total. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall first; the remaining return would depend on trading fees and 99%.

The reward component would fall to zero when incentives expire. It is already represented as 0.0%, so the pool currently depends primarily on its 3.0% in trading fees rather than a stated incentive schedule.

The reward component would fall to zero when incentives expire. It is already represented as 0.0%, so the pool currently depends primarily on its 3.0% in trading fees rather than a stated incentive schedule.

Risk is elevated because BUCK can reprice sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool's 0.01x indicates low trading activity relative to its $179K. Fee income of 3.0% may not offset losses from SOL/BUCK divergence or a rapid liquidity drain.

Risk is elevated because BUCK can reprice sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool's 0.01x indicates low trading activity relative to its $179K. Fee income of 3.0% may not offset losses from SOL/BUCK divergence or a rapid liquidity drain.

For SOL-BUCK, an exit is defensible when price leaves the selected range, volume weakens further, liquidity drains, or the current EXIT and scanner=CRITICAL signal remain unchanged. The existing unopposed EXIT signal argues against waiting for a small amount of additional fee income.

For SOL-BUCK, an exit is defensible when price leaves the selected range, volume weakens further, liquidity drains, or the current EXIT and scanner=CRITICAL signal remain unchanged. The existing unopposed EXIT signal argues against waiting for a small amount of additional fee income.

There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is path-dependent. At 3.1%, fees accrue slowly relative to a sharp repricing, so break-even depends on future trading volume and whether SOL and BUCK reconverge in price.

There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is path-dependent. At 3.1%, fees accrue slowly relative to a sharp repricing, so break-even depends on future trading volume and whether SOL and BUCK reconverge in price.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights