new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, Exit at 80/100, and a live verdict of EXIT. The verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1313 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, so the signal supports monitoring an existing position rather than treating the pool as a clear entry or exit case. The assessment would worsen if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee APR collapses; it could improve if durable volume raises fee generation without a comparable liquidity outflow.
Computed 2026-10-05 17:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$84.24K
Total value locked
$52.43
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with an explicit exit trigger: reassess or withdraw if 24h volume falls materially below the current $52 while TVL remains near $84K, because fee generation would weaken without a reward component to offset it.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $52.43 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.13 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-GYAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#6736 of 80377 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 10% of all Solana pools
overall rank #12040 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GYAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GYAT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other, and the value of your deposit can fall if their prices move sharply apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current APR does not rely on a reward schedule; reward dependency is not established. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay and exit timing should be reassessed rather than assuming the displayed APR persists.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently in range are not available, so this pool has no usable historical basis for estimating price-divergence losses or range efficiency. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GYAT carries abrupt repricing, liquidity withdrawal, and adverse selection risk in addition to ordinary SOL-GYAT divergence. With no reported reward component, emission decay is not the immediate risk; the practical exit question is whether trading activity and fee generation persist before memecoin liquidity contracts.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more liquid and widely traded side of this pair across Solana markets, which generally makes its market price easier to reference than GYAT's. For this LP, a SOL move relative to GYAT changes the asset mix held by the pool and can create impermanent loss even when SOL liquidity remains available elsewhere.
tollGYAT Context
GYAT is the concentrated memecoin exposure in this pair, and its liquidity is likely less durable and less widely distributed than SOL liquidity. A sharp GYAT move, loss of market depth, or disappearance of buyers can increase inventory imbalance and make withdrawal execution more consequential for this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GYAT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other, and the value of your deposit can fall if their prices move sharply apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DgqD4rmBKf3Upcy7GUkLMyosaP4HpzmUWSVsUZatJLkY
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GYAT (EfgEGG9P…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. Because the reported yield is fee-led, emission decay is not currently reducing the stated APR, but any future rewards should be treated as temporary unless their schedule is verified.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. Because the reported yield is fee-led, emission decay is not currently reducing the stated APR, but any future rewards should be treated as temporary unless their schedule is verified.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a reported reward contribution at present. If incentives are added before expiry, the post-expiry APR would depend mainly on trading fees, whose sustainability is 100%.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a reported reward contribution at present. If incentives are added before expiry, the post-expiry APR would depend mainly on trading fees, whose sustainability is 100%.
Risk is elevated because GYAT can move sharply or lose liquidity while SOL continues trading in deeper markets. This pool has TVL of $84K, 24h volume of $52, and volume-to-TVL of 0.00x, but recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable.
Risk is elevated because GYAT can move sharply or lose liquidity while SOL continues trading in deeper markets. This pool has TVL of $84K, 24h volume of $52, and volume-to-TVL of 0.00x, but recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable.
Use a measurable deterioration in fee activity as an exit signal: reassess when volume falls materially below $52, TVL drains from $84K, or fee-only APR drops below 0.0%. Also consider exiting before a known reward schedule decays if future incentives become part of the return.
Use a measurable deterioration in fee activity as an exit signal: reassess when volume falls materially below $52, TVL drains from $84K, or fee-only APR drops below 0.0%. Also consider exiting before a known reward schedule decays if future incentives become part of the return.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Fees currently contribute 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%, but those figures do not guarantee recovery if SOL and GYAT diverge sharply or trading activity declines.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Fees currently contribute 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%, but those figures do not guarantee recovery if SOL and GYAT diverge sharply or trading activity declines.
