new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 60/100 with Enter 56/100, Hold 65/100, and Exit 18/100 places this pool in an exit-oriented state rather than a new-entry or passive-hold state. The live verdict is HOLD: the AI engine is hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively weak position within the tracked set, consistent with modest activity and limited TVL. The assessment would improve if TVL and sustained volume increased enough to support fee generation, the scanner ceased flagging critical conditions, and the pool developed a verifiable operating history; a TVL drain, further volume reduction, or fee-yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-25 22:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$31.67K
Total value locked
$2.25K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 2.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a monitored range and set an explicit exit trigger: close the position if the volume-to-TVL ratio falls below 0.07x for three consecutive daily observations or if the scanner remains CRITICAL at the next review.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.25K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.62 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-Jarvis pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1635 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3938 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Jarvis liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JARVIS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. If the two prices move apart, you may withdraw a different mix of assets and lose value compared with simply holding them, and the small pool may be difficult to exit.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 4.1% fee APR and 0.1% reward APR. 98% means the current return is fee-funded, while reward dependency is not established; no time-bound reward duration is available to model. With 24-hour volume of $2K against $32K in TVL, fee generation depends on trading activity remaining sufficient to support the current rate.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range exposure are not reported, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-JARVIS carries material token-price divergence and liquidity-exit risk, particularly if JARVIS activity fades. Emission decay is not currently the main APR risk because reward APR is 0.1%; the practical risk is that fee flow weakens before an LP exits.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid, established side of this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than JARVIS. SOL price movements relative to JARVIS change the pool balance and can create impermanent loss for an LP even when fee income continues. SOL's broader market liquidity may make that side easier to hedge or exit, but it does not remove pair-specific risk.
tollJarvis Context
JARVIS is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price, trading depth, and holder activity are likely to dominate the pool's exit conditions. LPs should compare JARVIS liquidity across venues before assuming this pool can absorb a position exit without price impact. A sharp JARVIS move against SOL can shift the LP toward the weaker asset and increase impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JARVIS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. If the two prices move apart, you may withdraw a different mix of assets and lose value compared with simply holding them, and the small pool may be difficult to exit.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DhnhjRBsA2hxwJB7gkw6dzK1u6HySTZjuWfXKTdcjNJ
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Jarvis (CmpuL8k9…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
10%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
177%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.1%, so the stated 4.2% is funded by 98% rather than active emissions. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward component would fall, but fee income would still depend on $2K of daily volume and $32K of liquidity.
The current reward-only APR is 0.1%, so the stated 4.2% is funded by 98% rather than active emissions. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward component would fall, but fee income would still depend on $2K of daily volume and $32K of liquidity.
There is no current reward contribution beyond 0.1%, and the reward schedule is not established. If incentives expire or decline, the remaining return would be trading fees of 4.1%, assuming volume does not weaken.
There is no current reward contribution beyond 0.1%, and the reward schedule is not established. If incentives expire or decline, the remaining return would be trading fees of 4.1%, assuming volume does not weaken.
The risk is high because JARVIS can move sharply relative to SOL, while $32K of liquidity and $2K of daily volume may limit exit capacity. The pool's 0.07x ratio and the CRITICAL scanner signal indicate that fee income and liquidity conditions deserve close monitoring.
The risk is high because JARVIS can move sharply relative to SOL, while $32K of liquidity and $2K of daily volume may limit exit capacity. The pool's 0.07x ratio and the CRITICAL scanner signal indicate that fee income and liquidity conditions deserve close monitoring.
For SOL-JARVIS, an exit is indicated if the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume falls below the current 0.07x relationship to TVL, or JARVIS liquidity deteriorates elsewhere. The current live verdict is HOLD, so an LP should not wait for a large price move before reassessing.
For SOL-JARVIS, an exit is indicated if the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume falls below the current 0.07x relationship to TVL, or JARVIS liquidity deteriorates elsewhere. The current live verdict is HOLD, so an LP should not wait for a large price move before reassessing.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At fee APR of 4.1%, fee income alone would take many years to offset a large price-divergence loss, before considering changes in volume, TVL, or the SOL-JARVIS price relationship.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At fee APR of 4.1%, fee income alone would take many years to offset a large price-divergence loss, before considering changes in volume, TVL, or the SOL-JARVIS price relationship.
