new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 50/100 assigns Enter 44/100, Hold 58/100, and Exit 23/100, with the live verdict HOLD and verdict driver ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #1029 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, so the assessment places it in a middle portion of the monitored set rather than treating it as a top-ranked fee venue. The hold view is consistent with fee-only yield and existing liquidity, but it would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened enough to reduce 8.4%, reward emissions were added and then decayed, or BAN volatility produced sustained adverse inventory exposure.
Computed 2026-10-22 11:38 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$2.70M
Total value locked
$246.81K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up8.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 5.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately defined exit rule based on realized fees: leave or reassess the position if the rolling fee income no longer covers your minimum required return after accounting for SOL-BAN price divergence. Because current seven-day range data is unavailable, avoid assuming a narrow concentrated range is safe; if using one, rebalance when price approaches either boundary rather than waiting for the position to become one-sided.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 8.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 8.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $246.81K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $617.02 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-Ban pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1508 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3610 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Ban liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BAN into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, currently represented by 8.4%, but your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding SOL and BAN if their prices move apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-BAN's total APR of 8.8% consists of 8.4% from trading fees and 0.4% from rewards. 96% means the displayed yield is not currently supported by token emissions. Reward dependency and the remaining reward duration are not established, so future APR should be evaluated primarily through realized trading volume, fee capture, and changes in pool liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available for this pool, and seven-day tick concentration cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-BAN is exposed to sharp BAN price moves, liquidity withdrawal, and one-sided inventory accumulation; emission decay is also a relevant family risk if incentives are introduced later. Exit timing should therefore be based on declining fee production, weakening liquidity, or a material change in BAN market structure rather than on a fixed reward schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset and the more established side of this pair, with substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than BAN. If SOL rises or falls sharply relative to BAN, the pool rebalances toward the weaker-performing asset, which can increase impermanent loss even when fee income remains positive. SOL's broader liquidity can make external hedging or position reduction easier than for BAN, but it does not remove pair-specific price divergence.
tollBan Context
BAN is the memecoin side of the pair and likely drives much of the pool's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. A rapid BAN rally can leave the LP with less BAN exposure and more SOL, while a sharp BAN decline can leave the LP holding more BAN as its market value falls. Liquidity elsewhere for BAN should be verified before entering because thin external markets can amplify slippage and exit costs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BAN into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, currently represented by 8.4%, but your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding SOL and BAN if their prices move apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DmAsjXoceoL5vTKZbYpTpXPo7MKm16FMfNMm3PJFiUha
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Ban (9PR7nCP9…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
18%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.4%, so the stated total APR of 8.8% is presently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component unless higher trading fees offset it.
The current reward-only APR is 0.4%, so the stated total APR of 8.8% is presently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component unless higher trading fees offset it.
There is no current reward contribution in the supplied figures, so expiration of any future or undocumented incentive would not directly remove the existing fee component of 8.8%. After incentives end, the remaining return would depend on 8.4%, trading volume, liquidity, and price divergence.
There is no current reward contribution in the supplied figures, so expiration of any future or undocumented incentive would not directly remove the existing fee component of 8.8%. After incentives end, the remaining return would depend on 8.4%, trading volume, liquidity, and price divergence.
Risk is materially driven by BAN's price volatility, the depth of liquidity available for exits, and divergence between SOL and BAN. The pool offers 8.8% total APR with 96%, but fee income does not eliminate impermanent loss or the possibility of holding a larger share of a falling BAN position.
Risk is materially driven by BAN's price volatility, the depth of liquidity available for exits, and divergence between SOL and BAN. The pool offers 8.8% total APR with 96%, but fee income does not eliminate impermanent loss or the possibility of holding a larger share of a falling BAN position.
Consider exiting when realized fee income falls below your required return, TVL or swap activity deteriorates, or BAN's external liquidity becomes insufficient for a controlled reduction. For SOL-BAN, an exit rule should also account for the absence of a usable seven-day range reading and the possibility of emission decay if rewards are introduced.
Consider exiting when realized fee income falls below your required return, TVL or swap activity deteriorates, or BAN's external liquidity becomes insufficient for a controlled reduction. For SOL-BAN, an exit rule should also account for the absence of a usable seven-day range reading and the possibility of emission decay if rewards are introduced.
A fixed break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool's recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. A simple gross estimate based on annual fee yield would use 8.4%, but actual recovery depends on future trading fees, SOL-BAN price divergence, rebalancing, and exit slippage.
A fixed break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool's recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. A simple gross estimate based on annual fee yield would use 8.4%, but actual recovery depends on future trading fees, SOL-BAN price divergence, rebalancing, and exit slippage.
