WealthVille
CONST
C
TAO
T

CONST-TAOon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $25.35K
APR
1.1% APR
24h Volume
$186.25 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
DsCm8QQ3…Re2x · observed 2026-10-27
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, producing a live EXIT verdict from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1363 of 24532 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools by that ranking, but the result does not remove the pool's low-turnover and memecoin risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee income collapsed, sustained volume improved, or measurable range and impermanent-loss data showed stronger operating conditions.

Computed 2026-10-27 06:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$25.35K

Total value locked

$186.25

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

1.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 3.9%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 90m agoTVL ↓0.7%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 77/100
tips_and_updates

Enter only with a predefined narrow monitoring range, and rebalance or exit when the position approaches a range boundary or when realized fees no longer compensate for the observed price divergence and available exit depth.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR1.1%——
Fee APR1.0%——
Volume$186.25——
Fees Earned$0.47——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
3.9%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
3.9%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.01x(protocol avg 3.5x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 CONST-TAO pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#13182 of 93745 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 13% of all Solana pools

overall rank #19057 of 150817

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CONST-TAO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing CONST and TAO into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become less valuable than simply holding both assets if either token moves sharply, and the pool's fee income depends on continued trading.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into 1.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the displayed yield comes from fees, so the position is not currently dependent on token emissions. Reward timing cannot be assessed from the available pool data; the relevant question is whether trading volume remains sufficient to support 1.0%.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history is not reported, so the pool provides no measured basis for estimating recent price-divergence losses or time spent in range. CONST-TAO belongs to the MEMECOIN family: emission decay is a secondary concern while reward APR is zero, but price shocks, shallow liquidity, and rapid exit timing can dominate fee income. A drop in activity can also make exits more costly relative to the pool's limited depth.

tollCONST Context

CONST is one side of this pool's inventory, so providing liquidity requires exposure to both CONST and TAO rather than holding CONST alone. Liquidity depth for CONST elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; a sharp move in CONST can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss for the LP even when fee accrual continues.

tollTAO Context

TAO is the quote-side asset paired with CONST in this pool, and its price changes affect the relative value of the LP's two-asset inventory. Liquidity depth for TAO elsewhere is not established here, so a TAO move against CONST can shift the position toward the falling asset and make exit execution more important.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing CONST and TAO into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become less valuable than simply holding both assets if either token moves sharply, and the pool's fee income depends on continued trading.

token

Token Details

CONST
CONSTSolana
Explorer

CONST is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

TAO
TAOBittensorSolana
Explorer

Bittensor (TAO) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
DsCm8QQ3L8nyoD7edEceB8cwTSwA7FXJrEeQx4KwRe2x
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
CONST (oWeyEsRQ…)
Token B
TAO (taoC6xyv…)
Created
9/7/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Emission decay has no current contribution to the displayed return because reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee-only APR is 1.0%. If incentives are introduced or removed later, only the reward component would change directly; current fee income still depends on trading activity.

Emission decay has no current contribution to the displayed return because reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee-only APR is 1.0%. If incentives are introduced or removed later, only the reward component would change directly; current fee income still depends on trading activity.

The pool already shows reward-only APR of 0.0%, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. The remaining return would be the fee-only APR of 1.0%, supported by trading volume rather than emissions.

The pool already shows reward-only APR of 0.0%, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. The remaining return would be the fee-only APR of 1.0%, supported by trading volume rather than emissions.

Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, limited liquidity of $25K, and the possibility of sharp CONST or TAO price moves. Fee income is 1.0%, but that does not cap impermanent loss or guarantee an orderly exit.

Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, limited liquidity of $25K, and the possibility of sharp CONST or TAO price moves. Fee income is 1.0%, but that does not cap impermanent loss or guarantee an orderly exit.

For CONST-TAO, predefined exit signals should include a material TVL drain, a sustained reduction in volume, movement toward a range boundary, or fee income no longer compensating for price-divergence risk. Exit timing matters because shallow liquidity can make a delayed sale more costly.

For CONST-TAO, predefined exit signals should include a material TVL drain, a sustained reduction in volume, movement toward a range boundary, or fee income no longer compensating for price-divergence risk. Exit timing matters because shallow liquidity can make a delayed sale more costly.

There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future volume and price paths are unknown. At a constant fee rate of 1.0%, fee recovery would still depend on how large the price divergence becomes and whether trading activity persists.

There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future volume and price paths are unknown. At a constant fee rate of 1.0%, fee recovery would still depend on how large the price divergence becomes and whether trading activity persists.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights