new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 41/100, with Enter at 35/100, Hold at 47/100, and Exit at 34/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #718 of 24532 raydium-amm pools. That position indicates a hold-oriented assessment rather than a strong entry signal: the fee-funded structure and observed volume support continued monitoring, but the MEMECOIN classification and missing range and IL history limit confidence. A material TVL drain, collapse in 86.0% or 62.1%, or evidence that volume is not sustaining fees would change the assessment toward exit; durable fee generation with stable liquidity would support the current verdict.
Computed 2026-11-06 07:03 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$75.21K
Total value locked
$47.36K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up86.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -39.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Before entering, set a personal TVL floor and minimum fee-APR threshold; exit if TVL falls materially below that floor or 62.1% no longer compensates for memecoin price risk. Reassess the position after large SNDK price moves because current range utilization is not reported.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 86.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 62.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $47.36K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $118.39 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SNDK-SNDK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1221 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2793 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SNDK-SNDK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing assets into the SNDK-SNDK trading pool so other users can swap, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your position can lose value relative to simply holding SNDK if prices move sharply, and the pool's current return is represented by 86.0%.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR decomposes into 62.1% from trading fees and 23.9% from rewards. 72% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so the current return does not rely on a reported reward stream. Because reward dependency and lifecycle data are not established, future emission changes cannot be assigned a reliable schedule; the fee component is the relevant source of current yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range data is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the reported metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SNDK-SNDK carries sharp price-move and liquidity-contraction risk; any future emissions may decay, and exit timing matters because fee income can fall as traders and liquidity leave. A fee-funded APR does not remove the risk that SNDK price movement changes the value of the deposited assets.
tollSNDK Context
SNDK is one side of this pool, so an LP is exposed to SNDK price movement while earning a share of swap fees. The pool's TVL does not establish SNDK's liquidity depth on other venues; that must be assessed separately before relying on a position exit. SNDK appreciation or decline relative to the other pool leg changes the LP's inventory and can create divergence loss.
tollSNDK Context
SNDK is also the other side of the named pair, making the position's economic exposure dependent on how this pool represents and prices the two SNDK legs. The available pool figures do not show SNDK liquidity elsewhere, so external exit depth remains unverified. Changes in SNDK price action can alter both the mark value of the position and the fee volume available to LPs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing assets into the SNDK-SNDK trading pool so other users can swap, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your position can lose value relative to simply holding SNDK if prices move sharply, and the pool's current return is represented by 86.0%.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- EAsWkdoY1n8j6hmfEKVQHoz8yfFs7VhUnsZoBGtFu8Jw
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SNDK (SNDKbwMU…)
- Token B
- SNDK (8t5C4AWD…)
- Created
- 9/25/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
20%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current yield is split between 62.1% in trading fees and 23.9% in rewards. Since the reward component is currently zero, emission decay would not reduce the present reward contribution, but any future reward program could decline while fee income depends on trading activity.
Current yield is split between 62.1% in trading fees and 23.9% in rewards. Since the reward component is currently zero, emission decay would not reduce the present reward contribution, but any future reward program could decline while fee income depends on trading activity.
The stated reward APR is already 23.9%, so expiration of a future incentive would not remove a current reward contribution. LP returns would then depend on 62.1% and the pool's ability to maintain trading volume, while the underlying memecoin price risk would remain.
The stated reward APR is already 23.9%, so expiration of a future incentive would not remove a current reward contribution. LP returns would then depend on 62.1% and the pool's ability to maintain trading volume, while the underlying memecoin price risk would remain.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain liquidity conditions, and the possibility of rapid SNDK price moves. The pool reports $75K in liquidity and $47K in 24h volume, but recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable for sizing that risk.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain liquidity conditions, and the possibility of rapid SNDK price moves. The pool reports $75K in liquidity and $47K in 24h volume, but recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable for sizing that risk.
Set the decision before entering: consider exiting if TVL contracts materially, fee income falls below your required level, or SNDK price action makes the position's exposure unacceptable. For this pool, monitor $75K, 62.1%, and 0.63x rather than relying on the headline APR alone.
Set the decision before entering: consider exiting if TVL contracts materially, fee income falls below your required level, or SNDK price action makes the position's exposure unacceptable. For this pool, monitor $75K, 62.1%, and 0.63x rather than relying on the headline APR alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 62.1% offset the position's actual divergence loss over your holding period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 62.1% offset the position's actual divergence loss over your holding period.
