new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 gives FBIT-SOL a middling overall assessment: Enter is 49/100, Hold is 54/100, and Exit is 30/100. The live verdict is HOLD, with ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #297 of 1435 meteora-damm-v2 pools, placing it above many peers but not among the highest-ranked opportunities. The hold view is consistent with fee-only yield and an observable pool, but not with strong activity: the assessment would change toward exit if TVL drains, volume falls further, or fee generation collapses, and toward entry only if sustained volume and liquidity improvement make 24.1% more credible.
Computed 2026-09-29 15:35 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.41K
Total value locked
$2.95K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up24.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 44.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a monitoring rule: review the position whenever 24h volume remains below $3K for several sessions, and exit if that weakness coincides with a material TVL decline. Because tick-in-range data is unavailable, avoid assuming a passive narrow range will remain active; use a wider range or rebalance after a sustained FBIT move against SOL.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 24.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 21.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.95K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $49.13 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 FBiT-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 2183 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 127180
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the FBiT-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing FBIT and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change more than simply holding FBIT and SOL because the pool automatically adjusts the balance after price moves.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 21.6% from trading fees and 2.5% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 90%; current reward contribution is zero, so emission decay is not presently reducing the stated APR, although the pool's broader reward-dependency status is not established. Fee income will still vary with volume, liquidity, and the share of fees retained by LPs.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss results and tick-in-range exposure are not available, so the position's realized price-divergence cost and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, FBIT-SOL carries elevated risk from abrupt FBIT price moves, liquidity migration, and one-sided inventory accumulation against SOL. Emission decay is a secondary risk here because reward yield is currently zero; exit timing should instead respond to weakening volume, shrinking TVL, or deteriorating FBIT liquidity before those conditions impair fee generation.
tollFBiT Context
FBIT is the memecoin side of this pair, and its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool data. A sharp FBIT move against SOL can create impermanent loss and leave the LP holding a larger FBIT share after rebalancing, while a rapid fall in FBIT demand can reduce both exit liquidity and fee volume.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established reference asset in the pair, but its role does not remove the risk created by FBIT's price movement. SOL strength against FBIT can shift the position toward FBIT, while SOL weakness can shift it toward SOL; either direction can produce inventory exposure that differs from simply holding both assets.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing FBIT and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change more than simply holding FBIT and SOL because the pool automatically adjusts the balance after price moves.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- ECUsT6sdz9rAj7tPfHnnHwxdkLaDcafHEfWZEdzc7hQx
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- FBiT (5uJ8rkiq…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 9/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
74%
APR
15%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only contribution is 2.5%, so emission decay is not currently subtracting from the displayed 24.1% through a falling reward stream. The pool's yield is instead 21.6% from trading fees, which depends on future activity.
The current reward-only contribution is 2.5%, so emission decay is not currently subtracting from the displayed 24.1% through a falling reward stream. The pool's yield is instead 21.6% from trading fees, which depends on future activity.
There is no current reward contribution, so expiration would not remove a reward component from the displayed APR. LP income would continue to depend on 21.6% in fees, with 90% indicating the current fee share of yield.
There is no current reward contribution, so expiration would not remove a reward component from the displayed APR. LP income would continue to depend on 21.6% in fees, with 90% indicating the current fee share of yield.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because FBIT can move sharply, lose external liquidity, or see demand disappear. The pool has $35K in liquidity and $3K in 24h volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-exposure readings are unavailable.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because FBIT can move sharply, lose external liquidity, or see demand disappear. The pool has $35K in liquidity and $3K in 24h volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-exposure readings are unavailable.
For FBIT-SOL, an exit signal is sustained volume below $3K combined with a material TVL decline, a sharp FBIT move that leaves the position heavily exposed to one asset, or a collapse in fee income. Do not treat the displayed 24.1% as a reason to remain if those conditions develop.
For FBIT-SOL, an exit signal is sustained volume below $3K combined with a material TVL decline, a sharp FBIT move that leaves the position heavily exposed to one asset, or a collapse in fee income. Do not treat the displayed 24.1% as a reason to remain if those conditions develop.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and 24.1% is an annualized rate that depends on variable trading activity. With 0.08x volume relative to liquidity, fee income may fluctuate materially, so the actual recovery period could be substantially longer than a simple annualized-yield calculation suggests.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and 24.1% is an annualized rate that depends on variable trading activity. With 0.08x volume relative to liquidity, fee income may fluctuate materially, so the actual recovery period could be substantially longer than a simple annualized-yield calculation suggests.
