DRAM-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $378.51K
- APR
- 39.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $229.41K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- ECkcSDJv…bEWN · observed 2026-09-08
Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 54% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 57/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 52/100 and Hold threshold of 63/100, while the Exit score is 18/100. The live verdict is HOLD because ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #1202 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools indicates a relatively weak position in the tracked set, not a protocol-wide failure. The assessment would improve if volume and fee generation persisted while TVL deepened, the scanner cleared, and the unopposed exit signal disappeared; a TVL drain, lower volume, or yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-09-08 07:29 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$378.51K
Total value locked
$229.41K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up39.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 16.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a monitored range and set a rule to rebalance or exit when DRAM leaves that range, volume declines materially from $229K, or the unopposed EXIT signal remains active; do not leave the position unattended through a memecoin momentum break.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 39.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 33.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $229.41K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $573.55 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 DRAM-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#824 of 15650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4381 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the DRAM-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing DRAM and USDC into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive a share of trading fees, but DRAM's price can change enough that the value of your deposit falls relative to simply holding the tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into fee-only 33.0% and reward-only 6.1%. 84% means current yield depends on trading activity rather than farm emissions; reward dependency and any incentive timetable are not established. With volume at $229K relative to $379K of liquidity, the fee rate can fall quickly if routing activity weakens.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so realized loss cannot be used to validate the current APR. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving the degree of concentrated-range exposure unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, DRAM-USDC is exposed to abrupt DRAM repricing, one-sided liquidity, and emission decay or incentive withdrawal; exit timing matters because fees may not offset a rapid price move.
tollDRAM Context
DRAM is the volatile memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement determines most of the pool's inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure relative to USDC. Liquidity depth for DRAM elsewhere is not established here; thin external markets would make exits and rebalancing more price-sensitive. A sharp DRAM rally or selloff can move the position away from its intended range and reduce fee production.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quoted stablecoin side, providing the reference value against which DRAM is priced. USDC has broad utility on Solana, but that does not establish deep liquidity for this specific pair or protect an LP from DRAM-specific losses. As DRAM moves, the position can become increasingly concentrated in either DRAM or USDC.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing DRAM and USDC into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive a share of trading fees, but DRAM's price can change enough that the value of your deposit falls relative to simply holding the tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- ECkcSDJvKiyoVU5f1L6CgpSmMVd1S4KGRkXW56f1bEWN
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- DRAM (DRAMjSWR…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 6/28/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 6.1%, while fee-only APR is 33.0% and total APR is 39.1%. Because 84%, emission decay has little current effect on the displayed yield, but any future rewards would need separate verification.
The current reward-only component is 6.1%, while fee-only APR is 33.0% and total APR is 39.1%. Because 84%, emission decay has little current effect on the displayed yield, but any future rewards would need separate verification.
The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving fee income as the main source of return. For this pool, fee-only APR is 33.0% and current total APR is 39.1%, so the remaining yield would depend on volume of $229K against $379K of liquidity.
The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving fee income as the main source of return. For this pool, fee-only APR is 33.0% and current total APR is 39.1%, so the remaining yield would depend on volume of $229K against $379K of liquidity.
Risk is high because DRAM can move sharply against USDC, and the pool has a live HOLD assessment with a CRITICAL scanner signal. Recent impermanent-loss history and range history are unavailable, so the loss profile cannot be validated from those measures.
Risk is high because DRAM can move sharply against USDC, and the pool has a live HOLD assessment with a CRITICAL scanner signal. Recent impermanent-loss history and range history are unavailable, so the loss profile cannot be validated from those measures.
For DRAM-USDC, an exit rule should be triggered by a sustained CRITICAL scanner result, the unopposed EXIT signal, a TVL drain, falling volume from $229K, or DRAM leaving the selected range. Waiting for incentives is not a substitute for a defined exit rule because current reward dependency is not established.
For DRAM-USDC, an exit rule should be triggered by a sustained CRITICAL scanner result, the unopposed EXIT signal, a TVL drain, falling volume from $229K, or DRAM leaving the selected range. Waiting for incentives is not a substitute for a defined exit rule because current reward dependency is not established.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. At total APR of 39.1%, fees would need to persist long enough to exceed the position's DRAM-versus-USDC loss, which cannot be inferred from the headline APR alone.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. At total APR of 39.1%, fees would need to persist long enough to exceed the position's DRAM-versus-USDC loss, which cannot be inferred from the headline APR alone.
