DRAM-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $310.53K
- APR
- 51.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $127.43K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- ECkcSDJv…bEWN · observed 2026-11-01
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 54/100 gives this pool a Hold verdict, with Enter at 48/100, Hold at 61/100, and Exit at 19/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1258 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools. In practical terms, the model is not identifying a current reason to add exposure, but it is also not assigning the strongest exit signal; that stance is consistent with a fee-funded pool whose volume supports yield but whose memecoin price and liquidity risks remain material. A sustained TVL drain, lower volume-to-TVL activity, collapse in fee APR, or worsening DRAM liquidity would weaken the assessment; durable fee generation and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-11-01 10:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$310.53K
Total value locked
$127.43K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up51.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 45.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined range and set a rebalance review when DRAM moves materially outside that range or when the pool's fee rate begins to weaken; exit if TVL contracts sharply or fee generation no longer compensates for the loss risk from holding DRAM.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 51.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 41.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $127.43K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $318.61 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 4 DRAM-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#448 of 19841 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2955 of 152129
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the DRAM-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing DRAM and USDC into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large DRAM price moves can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had simply held them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 41.7% from trading fees and 10.0% from rewards. 81% of the stated yield comes from fees, so current returns do not depend on an active reward stream; a reward-duration estimate is not established. The fee figure remains an annualized rate and can fall if DRAM-USDC volume or fee capture declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so recent loss from price divergence and the amount of time liquidity would have remained active cannot be quantified here. As a MEMECOIN pool, DRAM-USDC is exposed to abrupt price moves, thin or retreating liquidity, and rapid changes in trading activity. Emission decay and exit timing matter for this family: if incentives appear later, their value can decline quickly, while the current fee-only structure leaves the position dependent on continued swaps rather than scheduled emissions.
tollDRAM Context
DRAM is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC is the accounting and settlement asset. Liquidity depth for DRAM elsewhere is not established by the supplied data; a sharp DRAM move can create impermanent loss, leave the LP holding more DRAM after a decline, or remove DRAM exposure after a rally.
tollUSDC Context
USDC provides the relatively stable side of the pair and makes the position economically similar to continuously trading DRAM against dollars. USDC liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here, but changes in DRAM price determine how the pool's assets are rebalanced and how much USDC an LP ultimately holds.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing DRAM and USDC into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large DRAM price moves can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had simply held them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- ECkcSDJvKiyoVU5f1L6CgpSmMVd1S4KGRkXW56f1bEWN
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- DRAM (DRAMjSWR…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 6/28/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 10.0%, while fee income is 41.7% and total APR is 51.7%. Because the stated yield is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently account for the pool's displayed APR, but any future incentive program could decline over time.
The current reward component is 10.0%, while fee income is 41.7% and total APR is 51.7%. Because the stated yield is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently account for the pool's displayed APR, but any future incentive program could decline over time.
The supplied figures show 10.0% in reward APR, so there is no current reward contribution to remove from the displayed 51.7%. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only that reward component would disappear; fee income would remain tied to trading volume.
The supplied figures show 10.0% in reward APR, so there is no current reward contribution to remove from the displayed 51.7%. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only that reward component would disappear; fee income would remain tied to trading volume.
Risk is high relative to a stable or blue-chip pair because DRAM can move abruptly and liquidity can retreat quickly. The position currently shows 51.7% total APR, but its fee-funded return does not eliminate impermanent loss or the risk of holding DRAM after a price decline.
Risk is high relative to a stable or blue-chip pair because DRAM can move abruptly and liquidity can retreat quickly. The position currently shows 51.7% total APR, but its fee-funded return does not eliminate impermanent loss or the risk of holding DRAM after a price decline.
For DRAM-USDC, review an exit when TVL or trading activity deteriorates, when DRAM leaves the chosen range and is not rebalanced, or when fee income no longer compensates for exposure to DRAM. A sharp liquidity drain is a stronger exit signal than a temporary change in the displayed APR.
For DRAM-USDC, review an exit when TVL or trading activity deteriorates, when DRAM leaves the chosen range and is not rebalanced, or when fee income no longer compensates for exposure to DRAM. A sharp liquidity drain is a stronger exit signal than a temporary change in the displayed APR.
It cannot be calculated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future DRAM price movement is unknown. If conditions stayed constant, the fee-only rate of 41.7% would provide a rough annualized recovery reference, but changing volume, range exposure, and price divergence can make the actual break-even period longer or prevent recovery.
It cannot be calculated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future DRAM price movement is unknown. If conditions stayed constant, the fee-only rate of 41.7% would provide a rough annualized recovery reference, but changing volume, range exposure, and price divergence can make the actual break-even period longer or prevent recovery.
