

VIDAx-CTOon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $19.45K
- APR
- 97.4% APR
- 24h Volume
- $2.09K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 2.00% fee
- Pool address
- EDBMuQjw…o95T · observed 2026-10-12
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 41/100, with Enter at 36/100, Hold at 48/100, and Exit at 32/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #1640 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, this places the pool in a middling part of the tracked set rather than among the highest-ranked opportunities. The hold assessment is consistent with high fee-funded APR but limited TVL and dependence on ongoing trading activity. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, collapse in fee APR, or evidence of severe range displacement would weaken the assessment; durable volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-10-12 14:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$19.45K
Total value locked
$2.09K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up97.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 76.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately monitored range centered on the current VIDAX-CTO price, and rebalance or exit when price leaves the range or when fee volume no longer compensates for the resulting one-sided exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 97.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 68.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.09K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $42.26 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 VIDAx-CTO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#591 of 18657 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5085 of 135723
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the VIDAx-CTO liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing VIDAX and CTO into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. You can end up with more of one token after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 68.1% fee APR and 29.3% reward APR, with 70%. Because reward APR is absent, emission decay is not currently reducing the stated yield; the relevant risk is that fee income falls if volume declines or liquidity changes. Reward duration cannot be established from the available pool data.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, VIDAX and CTO can experience sharp, asymmetric price moves that push a concentrated-liquidity position out of range and convert exposure into one-sided inventory. Emission decay and exit timing still matter for the family: even though current reward APR is absent, any future incentives may be temporary, while exiting after a rapid token move can crystallize divergence losses.
tollVIDAx Context
VIDAX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so its price movement relative to CTO determines which asset accumulates as the position moves through its range. Liquidity depth for VIDAX elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; a sharp VIDAX move or thin external markets can therefore increase inventory and execution risk for this LP.
tollCTO Context
CTO is the counter-asset against which VIDAX is priced in this pool, and its relative performance changes the position's asset mix. Liquidity depth for CTO elsewhere cannot be inferred here; CTO strength or weakness can move the pair out of range and leave the LP holding disproportionately more of the underperforming token.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing VIDAX and CTO into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. You can end up with more of one token after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- EDBMuQjwzwP8dxe7GwDTFsBSeCr2hEtyWs8hXV2No95T
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- VIDAx (XsfCC9VL…)
- Token B
- CTO (8K5X85PA…)
- Created
- 9/4/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current yield is fee-driven: 68.1% fee APR and 29.3% reward APR, with 70%. Since reward APR is absent, emission decay is not currently the source of APR decline; future incentives, if introduced, should be treated as potentially temporary.
Current yield is fee-driven: 68.1% fee APR and 29.3% reward APR, with 70%. Since reward APR is absent, emission decay is not currently the source of APR decline; future incentives, if introduced, should be treated as potentially temporary.
The current pool already shows 29.3% reward APR, so stated returns are not dependent on active farm incentives. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would come from 68.1%, which depends on trading volume and liquidity.
The current pool already shows 29.3% reward APR, so stated returns are not dependent on active farm incentives. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would come from 68.1%, which depends on trading volume and liquidity.
Risk is elevated because both assets belong to the MEMECOIN pool family and can move sharply relative to each other. The pool has $19K TVL and a 0.11x volume-to-TVL ratio, but recent range exposure and impermanent-loss history are not available to quantify how efficiently that activity has compensated LP risk.
Risk is elevated because both assets belong to the MEMECOIN pool family and can move sharply relative to each other. The pool has $19K TVL and a 0.11x volume-to-TVL ratio, but recent range exposure and impermanent-loss history are not available to quantify how efficiently that activity has compensated LP risk.
For VIDAX-CTO, consider exiting when price leaves your selected range, fee income falls materially from 68.1%, or TVL and volume deteriorate enough that fees no longer justify one-sided token exposure. A rapid VIDAX or CTO move is also a reason to reassess before the position becomes heavily concentrated in one asset.
For VIDAX-CTO, consider exiting when price leaves your selected range, fee income falls materially from 68.1%, or TVL and volume deteriorate enough that fees no longer justify one-sided token exposure. A rapid VIDAX or CTO move is also a reason to reassess before the position becomes heavily concentrated in one asset.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing fee income, currently represented by 68.1%, can offset divergence between VIDAX and CTO before the position is rebalanced or exited.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing fee income, currently represented by 68.1%, can offset divergence between VIDAX and CTO before the position is rebalanced or exited.




