gweil-xlrton Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $92.85K
- APR
- 1.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $320.12 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- ENx8UMzF…GwPR · observed 2026-08-25
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 47/100 places this pool at #970 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, while the Enter, Hold, and Exit scores are 41/100 / 55/100 / 25/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, which indicates a middle-ground assessment rather than a strong entry signal: fee-funded returns exist, but activity is limited and the pool's memecoin exposure remains material. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell further, or fee yield collapsed; stronger sustained volume, deeper liquidity, and clearer incentive or range-persistence data could improve it.
Computed 2026-08-25 09:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$92.85K
Total value locked
$320.12
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can monitor actively, and set an exit or rebalance trigger for a sustained loss of in-range status or a material decline in swap activity from the current 0.00x profile; do not leave the position unattended through a sharp memecoin move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $320.12 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.20 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 gweil-xlrt pools
by AI Farmer Score
#846 of 13158 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5903 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the gweil-xlrt liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GWEIL and XLRT into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If the tokens move sharply relative to each other, your deposit can become concentrated in one token and may earn fewer fees until you adjust or withdraw it.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield consists of 1.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the yield comes from trading fees, while the reward schedule and dependency are not established in the supplied data. Because the reward component is absent, any APR change would primarily reflect changes in trading volume, fee capture, or liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not available, so the pool's realized price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, both tokens can experience sharp price moves, which can leave a concentrated-liquidity position out of range or convert exposure toward the weaker-performing asset. No verified emission-decay schedule is available; exit timing should therefore account for volume deterioration, liquidity withdrawal, and any change in token momentum rather than relying on incentive persistence.
tollgweil Context
GWEIL is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, so its price movement relative to XLRT determines whether the position continues earning fees across its selected range. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; thin external liquidity would increase slippage and make sharp price moves more consequential for the LP.
tollxlrt Context
XLRT is the other side of the pair, and its relative price performance determines the LP's asset mix as the range is traversed. Liquidity depth for XLRT elsewhere is not established here, so a selloff or fragmented market could increase execution costs and amplify inventory imbalance.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GWEIL and XLRT into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If the tokens move sharply relative to each other, your deposit can become concentrated in one token and may earn fewer fees until you adjust or withdraw it.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- ENx8UMzFBTtRi72y9CZUxRKdveqFBEr14tKW69v1GwPR
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- gweil (CKvjP8Fr…)
- Token B
- xlrt (J1bZFRAF…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is currently 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3% and fee sustainability is 99%. If emissions decline, the direct effect on this pool should be limited unless a reward program is introduced, because the reported yield is fee-funded.
The reward component is currently 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3% and fee sustainability is 99%. If emissions decline, the direct effect on this pool should be limited unless a reward program is introduced, because the reported yield is fee-funded.
The supplied metrics show no reward contribution, so there is no reported incentive yield to remove from the current 1.3% total APR. Any remaining return would come from trading fees of 1.3%, which depends on future volume and liquidity.
The supplied metrics show no reward contribution, so there is no reported incentive yield to remove from the current 1.3% total APR. Any remaining return would come from trading fees of 1.3%, which depends on future volume and liquidity.
Risk is material because both assets may move sharply and the pool has limited trading activity relative to liquidity, reflected by a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable, so the realized effect of price divergence cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Risk is material because both assets may move sharply and the pool has limited trading activity relative to liquidity, reflected by a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable, so the realized effect of price divergence cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Consider exiting or rebalancing when swap activity weakens, TVL drains, the position remains out of range, or either token shows a sustained adverse price move. For this pool, those signals matter because current returns are fee-funded and not supported by reported rewards.
Consider exiting or rebalancing when swap activity weakens, TVL drains, the position remains out of range, or either token shows a sustained adverse price move. For this pool, those signals matter because current returns are fee-funded and not supported by reported rewards.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range persistence are unavailable. The fee-only rate of 1.3% provides the annualized income rate, but actual recovery depends on price divergence, time in range, volume, and whether fees continue at the current level.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range persistence are unavailable. The fee-only rate of 1.3% provides the annualized income rate, but actual recovery depends on price divergence, time in range, volume, and whether fees continue at the current level.
