new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That assessment is consistent with the scanner's CRITICAL classification and its strong, unopposed EXIT signal, despite ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, so it is not among the weakest-ranked listings, but its rank does not offset thin activity and memecoin-specific downside. A sustained increase in volume and fee generation, deeper TVL, or demonstrably persistent liquidity could improve the assessment; a TVL drain or collapse in fee yield would make it worse.
Computed 2026-10-26 00:12 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.75K
Total value locked
$216.18
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a defined exit trigger rather than passively holding: if the 0.00x turnover persists while the pool's fee accrual weakens, withdraw instead of waiting for a memecoin incentive cycle to recover.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $216.18 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.54 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-MOMO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#6124 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #11112 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-MOMO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MOMO into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the weaker token, and the stated return depends on limited trading activity rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.3% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 99% of the stated return is supported by trading fees, so the result depends on actual swap flow rather than emissions. Reward dependency cannot be verified from the available pool data, and no reward-expiry horizon is established.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-MOMO carries sharp price-divergence risk, shallow-liquidity risk, and emission-decay risk if incentives are introduced or changed; exit timing matters because a falling token price or declining swap flow can reduce both inventory value and fee income.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. If SOL appreciates relative to MOMO, the pool generally sells some SOL exposure into the move and leaves the LP with relatively more MOMO; a large divergence can therefore create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollMOMO Context
MOMO is the pool's memecoin leg, with liquidity and price formation more dependent on this venue and comparable small pools than SOL is. A MOMO price decline can leave the LP holding a larger share of the depreciating token, while a rapid MOMO rally can cause the pool to sell MOMO into that rally.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MOMO into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the weaker token, and the stated return depends on limited trading activity rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- EPVwQEJCnenVSNYECMA2955BGTqJk2ptXuggrvtiFFG2
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- MOMO (G4zwEA9N…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3% and total APR is 1.3%. Because the stated return is fee-led, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver, but any future incentives could decline as emissions end.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3% and total APR is 1.3%. Because the stated return is fee-led, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver, but any future incentives could decline as emissions end.
There is currently no stated reward contribution, so an incentive expiry would not remove the existing fee component of 1.3%. If future rewards are added, total APR would move toward the fee-only level of 1.3% when those rewards end.
There is currently no stated reward contribution, so an incentive expiry would not remove the existing fee component of 1.3%. If future rewards are added, total APR would move toward the fee-only level of 1.3% when those rewards end.
The main risks are MOMO price collapse, SOL-MOMO price divergence, thin liquidity, and low fee generation from limited trading activity. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the pool's recent behavior cannot be measured from those metrics.
The main risks are MOMO price collapse, SOL-MOMO price divergence, thin liquidity, and low fee generation from limited trading activity. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the pool's recent behavior cannot be measured from those metrics.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible when the current EXIT signal remains in place, turnover stays at 0.00x, or fee accrual weakens. A persistent TVL decline, worsening MOMO liquidity, or a failure of trading volume to support 1.3% would also argue against continued exposure.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible when the current EXIT signal remains in place, turnover stays at 0.00x, or fee accrual weakens. A persistent TVL decline, worsening MOMO liquidity, or a failure of trading volume to support 1.3% would also argue against continued exposure.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading volume is limited. The nominal 1.3% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fee income will offset price divergence or the cost of exiting the position.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading volume is limited. The nominal 1.3% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fee income will offset price divergence or the cost of exiting the position.
