new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 46/100, with Enter at 40/100, Hold at 54/100, and Exit at 26/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1114 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. In practical terms, the assessment supports monitoring an existing position rather than treating the pool as a clear new entry: its fee-only structure is transparent, but low liquidity and modest trading activity constrain fee reliability. A TVL drain, a sustained collapse in volume, or a material reduction in fee APR would change the assessment toward exit; stronger persistent volume and deeper liquidity would provide the basis for reconsideration.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$21.52K
Total value locked
$2.66K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up14.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 11.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a wide range rather than a narrow active range, and reassess the position when the pool's volume-to-liquidity ratio falls materially below 0.12x for several consecutive days; that is an exit signal because fee income may no longer compensate for memecoin price and liquidity risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 14.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 13.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.66K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $7.97 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-CPO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2175 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5217 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CPO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CPO into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and CPO if their prices move differently, especially when CPO liquidity is limited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-CPO decomposes into 13.3% fee APR and 0.9% reward APR. 93% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than active emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no current reward contribution to offset a decline in volume.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and seven-day tick-in-range data are not available for this pool, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-CPO also carries elevated token-specific volatility and liquidity-exit risk; emission decay is not currently reducing the stated APR because reward APR is zero, but weakening memecoin activity can reduce fee income quickly. Exit timing should therefore be tied to declining volume, shrinking liquidity, or a sustained loss of trading activity rather than to a fixed incentive schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than CPO. SOL price moves relative to CPO change the pool's asset balance and can create impermanent loss for LPs even when the position earns fees. Broader SOL liquidity does not remove the execution and withdrawal risks created by this pool's limited TVL.
tollCPO Context
CPO is the memecoin-side asset, so its price discovery and liquidity conditions are central to the pair's risk. Liquidity depth for CPO outside this pool is not provided here; thinner external liquidity would make sharp repricing and difficult exits more likely. A CPO rally or collapse relative to SOL can shift the LP toward the underperforming asset and increase impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CPO into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and CPO if their prices move differently, especially when CPO liquidity is limited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- ETrrvcdVf65WtjynjZ7jGbrdSiTBcTe8B2qHUakqreom
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CPO (E9rXspyi…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 14.3%, consisting of 13.3% in fees and 0.9% in rewards. Because the reward component is zero, emission decay is not currently the direct source of an APR reduction; the main variable is whether trading volume continues to generate 13.3%.
The current APR is 14.3%, consisting of 13.3% in fees and 0.9% in rewards. Because the reward component is zero, emission decay is not currently the direct source of an APR reduction; the main variable is whether trading volume continues to generate 13.3%.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated breakdown: 0.9% of APR comes from rewards. If incentives expire, the stated APR would not lose an existing reward component, but future fee income could still decline if incentives had been supporting trading activity.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated breakdown: 0.9% of APR comes from rewards. If incentives expire, the stated APR would not lose an existing reward component, but future fee income could still decline if incentives had been supporting trading activity.
Risk is material because CPO can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool has $22K TVL and a 0.12x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent impermanent loss and tick-range data are unavailable for measurement.
Risk is material because CPO can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool has $22K TVL and a 0.12x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent impermanent loss and tick-range data are unavailable for measurement.
For SOL-CPO, consider exiting when volume and fee generation weaken persistently, TVL drains, or CPO liquidity becomes difficult to access. A sustained decline from the current 0.12x volume-to-liquidity ratio is a practical warning that fee income may not justify continued exposure.
For SOL-CPO, consider exiting when volume and fee generation weaken persistently, TVL drains, or CPO liquidity becomes difficult to access. A sustained decline from the current 0.12x volume-to-liquidity ratio is a practical warning that fee income may not justify continued exposure.
A break-even period cannot be calculated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees, currently represented by 13.3%, offset the position's actual loss relative to holding SOL and CPO separately.
A break-even period cannot be calculated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees, currently represented by 13.3%, offset the position's actual loss relative to holding SOL and CPO separately.
