new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 57/100 places this pool below its Enter score of 53/100 and Hold score of 62/100, while the Exit score is 21/100. The live verdict is HOLD, consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. Its rank is #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, indicating a weak relative position within the listed pool set. The assessment would improve through sustained volume growth, deeper TVL, and fee generation that persists without depending on temporary emissions; a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or yield collapse would reinforce the exit assessment.
Computed 2026-09-25 08:11 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$42.75K
Total value locked
$993.23
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -19.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a deliberately small allocation and a defined price band, then exit rather than widen the range if the position leaves that band while volume remains weak or TVL drains; the current HOLD signal does not justify passive holding.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $993.23 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.48 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 NNN-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2711 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6163 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NNN-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NNN and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of NNN and SOL and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield decomposes into 1.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, and no rewards-based APR is currently reflected; therefore, emission decay is not the main explanation for current returns. Fee generation remains dependent on trading volume relative to the pool's liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, as is the reported tick-in-range history, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, NNN-SOL carries token-specific price, liquidity, and exit-liquidity risk; emissions may decay or fail to materialize, while exit timing can become difficult if trading activity and liquidity contract. The current scanner status is CRITICAL with an unopposed strong EXIT signal.
tollNNN Context
NNN is the memecoin side of this pair and is the primary source of token-specific price and liquidity risk for the LP. Liquidity depth for NNN elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; sharp NNN price movement changes the deposit mix and can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the paired asset and is the reference against which NNN's price movement determines the LP's inventory shift. SOL's broader market liquidity may support transactions, but it does not remove NNN-specific volatility or guarantee that this pool can absorb exits without price impact.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NNN and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of NNN and SOL and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Ep8QTjpu7kHeBTVra3DKpQ6jo2X1jafjMGPAwa3VqjVr
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- NNN (2DHtHTYW…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
81%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
33%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is shown as 1.8% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield coming from fees. Because no reward-based APR is currently reflected, emission decay is not presently reducing the displayed total APR, although future incentives are not established.
The current return is shown as 1.8% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield coming from fees. Because no reward-based APR is currently reflected, emission decay is not presently reducing the displayed total APR, although future incentives are not established.
The displayed total APR would lose only the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, while fee income represented by 1.8% would remain dependent on trading activity. Since reward dependency is unknown, the durability of any future incentive program cannot be assumed.
The displayed total APR would lose only the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, while fee income represented by 1.8% would remain dependent on trading activity. Since reward dependency is unknown, the durability of any future incentive program cannot be assumed.
Risk is high because NNN can experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and difficult exits, while the pool's scanner status is CRITICAL. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range histories are unavailable, so recent LP-specific behavior cannot be measured.
Risk is high because NNN can experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and difficult exits, while the pool's scanner status is CRITICAL. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range histories are unavailable, so recent LP-specific behavior cannot be measured.
For this pool, an exit is most defensible if NNN liquidity or price stability deteriorates, TVL drains, volume remains weak, or the position leaves its intended range without a clear reason to rebalance. The current live verdict is HOLD, with an unopposed strong EXIT signal.
For this pool, an exit is most defensible if NNN liquidity or price stability deteriorates, TVL drains, volume remains weak, or the position leaves its intended range without a clear reason to rebalance. The current live verdict is HOLD, with an unopposed strong EXIT signal.
No reliable break-even time can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee realization depends on low observed activity. Fees accrue at 1.8%, but that figure should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule for price divergence.
No reliable break-even time can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee realization depends on low observed activity. Fees accrue at 1.8%, but that figure should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule for price divergence.
