new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1794 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it well above the lower end of the tracked set, but the score does not remove the risks associated with small TVL, memecoin price divergence, and uncertain lifecycle data. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, trading volume contracts, fee APR collapses, or the pool becomes difficult to exit; it would improve only with durable volume, deeper liquidity, and observable persistence of fee generation.
Computed 2026-10-27 00:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$21.45K
Total value locked
$6.66K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up40.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -50.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a narrow range only if you can monitor it, and rebalance or exit when the position moves materially out of range, fee generation weakens, or pool TVL begins a sustained drain. With no reliable range-history or reward-duration data, avoid treating the current APR as a passive long-term assumption.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 40.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 33.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.66K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $16.65 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 OPENAI-GPT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1461 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3301 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the OPENAI-GPT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing OPENAI and GPT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and less of the stronger one.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 33.9% from swap fees and 6.4% from rewards. 84% means the quoted return depends on trading activity rather than farm emissions; because reward dependency and reward duration are not established, LPs should not assume an additional incentive stream or a fixed persistence of the current APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, OPENAI-GPT is exposed to abrupt price moves, thin liquidity, and one-sided flows; emission decay is not the primary stated risk because the current reward APR is absent, but exit timing can still be impaired if trading depth falls or LPs rush to withdraw.
tollOPENAI Context
OPENAI is one side of this concentrated liquidity position, paired with GPT. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here, so a sharp move in OPENAI can produce outsized inventory imbalance and wider execution impact. For the LP, OPENAI appreciation or decline changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding the tokens.
tollGPT Context
GPT is the other side of the pair and provides the quote-side exposure against OPENAI. Its broader liquidity and market depth are not established here, so GPT price movement can be just as important as OPENAI price movement for the position's composition. Divergence between GPT and OPENAI raises inventory risk even when swap fees remain available.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing OPENAI and GPT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and less of the stronger one.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Epi6SRByqT4AhJ3MGx7p2n1mVntumzRLiajE29Ao51T9
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- OPENAI (PreweJYE…)
- Token B
- GPT (8RAFGyza…)
- Created
- 9/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 33.9% in trading fees and 6.4% in rewards, so the stated return is currently fee-led. Because reward dependency is unknown and the reward component is absent, emission decay is not the main source of the present APR, but future incentives should not be assumed.
The current APR is split between 33.9% in trading fees and 6.4% in rewards, so the stated return is currently fee-led. Because reward dependency is unknown and the reward component is absent, emission decay is not the main source of the present APR, but future incentives should not be assumed.
There is no stated reward APR to remove from the current breakdown: 33.9% is the fee component and 6.4% is the reward component. If future incentives are introduced and later expire, only trading fees would remain, making volume, liquidity, and fee sustainability the key determinants of LP returns.
There is no stated reward APR to remove from the current breakdown: 33.9% is the fee component and 6.4% is the reward component. If future incentives are introduced and later expire, only trading fees would remain, making volume, liquidity, and fee sustainability the key determinants of LP returns.
Risk is elevated by memecoin volatility, limited depth at $21K, and uncertain exit liquidity. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so the magnitude of recent LP-specific risk cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Risk is elevated by memecoin volatility, limited depth at $21K, and uncertain exit liquidity. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so the magnitude of recent LP-specific risk cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Consider exiting when TVL or trading activity shows a sustained decline, when the fee return represented by 33.9% falls materially, or when the position moves out of its usable range. A sharp divergence between OPENAI and GPT is also a reason to reassess rather than wait for fee income to offset losses.
Consider exiting when TVL or trading activity shows a sustained decline, when the fee return represented by 33.9% falls materially, or when the position moves out of its usable range. A sharp divergence between OPENAI and GPT is also a reason to reassess rather than wait for fee income to offset losses.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. The relevant offset is fee income of 33.9%, but the time required depends on future volume, price divergence, and whether the position remains active in its range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. The relevant offset is fee income of 33.9%, but the time required depends on future volume, price divergence, and whether the position remains active in its range.
