CARDS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $61.77K
- APR
- 147.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $383.83K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.04% fee
- Pool address
- F3DAAusn…vn2i · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 places this pool in a middling position, with Enter 47/100, Hold 55/100, and Exit 27/100, producing the live verdict HOLD from ai_engine=hold. It ranks #529 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools, so the score does not place it among the strongest alternatives despite 147.8% total APR and 6.21x volume-to-TVL. The assessment would worsen if TVL drains, volume collapses, or fee APR falls; it would improve only if fee generation persists with deeper liquidity and more reliable range performance.
Computed 2026-08-23 00:52 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.77K
Total value locked
$383.83K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up147.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 14.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current CARDS-USDC price and rebalance when spot reaches within one-tenth of either boundary; exit or widen the range if volume-to-TVL falls below one times TVL for two consecutive days, because the current fee-led return depends on turnover.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 147.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 90.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $383.83K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $153.53 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#4 of 15 CARDS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#101 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #684 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CARDS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive part of their fees, but the value of your deposit can change because CARDS can move sharply and your chosen price range can stop earning fees.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 90.8% fee APR and 56.9% reward APR, with 61%. The current return therefore depends on continued trading volume, not farm emissions. Reward duration and dependency are not established, so any future incentive component should be treated as subject to emission decay rather than as persistent yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range observations are not reported, so recent inventory drag and range utilization cannot be quantified from this sheet. CARDS-USDC is a MEMECOIN pool: CARDS price shocks can rapidly move the position into an imbalanced asset mix, while concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees after price leaves the selected range. Because current yield is fee-led, exit timing should account for declining volume as well as any future emission decay; waiting for incentives to disappear can leave a thinner fee stream and harder execution.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC provides the pricing unit and settlement asset. Liquidity depth for CARDS outside this pool is not established here, so a large CARDS move or a thin external market can increase price impact and widen the LP's inventory imbalance. If CARDS rises sharply, the position tends to sell CARDS into the move; if it falls, the LP can accumulate CARDS while fee income may not offset the price loss.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the relatively stable side of the pair and normally represents the pool's quote asset. Its main risks here are issuer, depeg, and Solana market-structure risks rather than the memecoin volatility carried by CARDS. USDC liquidity can make the pair easier to value, but it does not remove the risk of holding CARDS exposure through the LP position.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive part of their fees, but the value of your deposit can change because CARDS can move sharply and your chosen price range can stop earning fees.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- F3DAAusn8mob9swWaX4ehaRrhi2Q3XJScKkuUpXdvn2i
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current pool return is fee-led: 90.8% comes from fees and 56.9% comes from rewards, with 61%. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward component would decline, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume rather than the emission schedule.
The current pool return is fee-led: 90.8% comes from fees and 56.9% comes from rewards, with 61%. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward component would decline, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume rather than the emission schedule.
The reported reward contribution is currently 56.9%, so expiration would not remove a current reward stream in the quoted figures. After any incentive program ends, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 90.8%, and on whether volume remains sufficient against $62K of liquidity.
The reported reward contribution is currently 56.9%, so expiration would not remove a current reward stream in the quoted figures. After any incentive program ends, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 90.8%, and on whether volume remains sufficient against $62K of liquidity.
Risk is substantial because CARDS can move sharply, and the pool has $62K of liquidity against $384K of daily volume. That turnover supports 90.8%, but it can also produce rapid inventory changes; the absence of reported recent range and impermanent-loss observations limits quantitative risk assessment.
Risk is substantial because CARDS can move sharply, and the pool has $62K of liquidity against $384K of daily volume. That turnover supports 90.8%, but it can also produce rapid inventory changes; the absence of reported recent range and impermanent-loss observations limits quantitative risk assessment.
For this pool, consider exiting when volume no longer supports the fee stream, such as when volume-to-TVL falls below one times TVL for multiple days, or when CARDS leaves your range and re-entry would require accepting a materially different inventory mix. A sustained drop from 6.21x or a collapse in 90.8% would weaken the current rationale.
For this pool, consider exiting when volume no longer supports the fee stream, such as when volume-to-TVL falls below one times TVL for multiple days, or when CARDS leaves your range and re-entry would require accepting a materially different inventory mix. A sustained drop from 6.21x or a collapse in 90.8% would weaken the current rationale.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported. 90.8% is an annualized fee rate, not a guaranteed recovery schedule; actual break-even depends on CARDS price movement, time in range, fees earned, and the future level of $384K.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported. 90.8% is an annualized fee rate, not a guaranteed recovery schedule; actual break-even depends on CARDS price movement, time in range, fees earned, and the future level of $384K.
