CARDS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $87.03K
- APR
- 97.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $392.90K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.04% fee
- Pool address
- F3DAAusn…vn2i · observed 2026-10-15
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 48/100 gives this pool an Enter score of 43/100, Hold score of 53/100, and Exit score of 28/100, producing the live verdict HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1023 among 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools, but the score does not remove the underlying dependence on volatile memecoin flow, shallow TVL, and fee sustainability. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume fell enough to collapse 68.0%, the pool moved out of its current ranking profile, or a durable reward program materially altered the return mix.
Computed 2026-10-15 12:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$87.03K
Total value locked
$392.90K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up97.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -21.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a deliberately bounded CARDS-USDC range around the current price, and rebalance or withdraw if price reaches within 20% of either boundary; exit sooner if fee generation weakens alongside a visible TVL drain, because the current return is entirely fee-led.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 97.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 68.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $392.90K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $157.16 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#5 of 17 CARDS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#383 of 18853 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2326 of 141086
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CARDS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. You can earn fees while trades continue, but a large CARDS price move can leave you holding more of one token, and your position may stop earning inside its chosen price range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 68.0% from swap fees and 29.2% from rewards, with 70% of yield attributed to trading fees. Reward-dependency data is not established, so the fee component should be treated as the current economic basis rather than assuming an ongoing incentive schedule. If emissions are introduced or later removed, the reward component would need to be reassessed separately.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also not reported, so neither recent divergence loss nor range utilization can be quantified from this sheet. CARDS is a memecoin exposure: rapid price moves can create inventory imbalance and adverse selection, while concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees when price leaves the selected range. Emission decay and uncertain pool lifecycle increase exit-timing risk; a fee-only APR can fall quickly if speculative volume or available liquidity contracts.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the volatile side of this pair, while USDC provides the quoted dollar side. The supplied metrics do not establish CARDS liquidity depth elsewhere on Solana, so a sharp CARDS move may be harder to exit without price impact than the headline volume suggests. For this LP, CARDS appreciation can leave the position more heavily exposed to USDC, while CARDS depreciation can leave more CARDS inventory.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the relatively stable accounting asset in the pair and is the reference for valuing CARDS trades. Its presence does not remove CARDS-specific volatility or the possibility that concentrated liquidity becomes one-sided. The supplied data does not establish USDC depth outside this pool, so external exit conditions should be checked separately.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. You can earn fees while trades continue, but a large CARDS price move can leave you holding more of one token, and your position may stop earning inside its chosen price range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- F3DAAusn8mob9swWaX4ehaRrhi2Q3XJScKkuUpXdvn2i
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current stated return is 97.2%, consisting of 68.0% in fees and 29.2% in rewards, so emission decay has no reported contribution to the current APR. If rewards are later added and then decay, only the reward portion would decline directly; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current stated return is 97.2%, consisting of 68.0% in fees and 29.2% in rewards, so emission decay has no reported contribution to the current APR. If rewards are later added and then decay, only the reward portion would decline directly; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward component is 29.2%, while 70% of stated yield comes from fees. If incentives expire or are reduced, the pool would rely more completely on swap fees generated by $393K of recent volume against $87K of liquidity.
The current reward component is 29.2%, while 70% of stated yield comes from fees. If incentives expire or are reduced, the pool would rely more completely on swap fees generated by $393K of recent volume against $87K of liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because CARDS can move sharply and alter the token mix you hold. The pool has $87K of liquidity and a 4.51x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available to quantify how efficiently that activity translated into LP results.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because CARDS can move sharply and alter the token mix you hold. The pool has $87K of liquidity and a 4.51x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available to quantify how efficiently that activity translated into LP results.
Use a pre-set price boundary and withdraw or rebalance when CARDS approaches it, rather than waiting for the position to become one-sided. A TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or collapse in 68.0% is a concrete exit signal because this pool's yield is fee-dependent.
Use a pre-set price boundary and withdraw or rebalance when CARDS approaches it, rather than waiting for the position to become one-sided. A TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or collapse in 68.0% is a concrete exit signal because this pool's yield is fee-dependent.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-range coverage are not reported. With 68.0% as the fee APR, break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and how large the CARDS price divergence becomes.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-range coverage are not reported. With 68.0% as the fee APR, break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and how large the CARDS price divergence becomes.
