new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 47/100 assigns Enter 41/100, Hold 54/100, and Exit 27/100, with the live verdict HOLD and verdict driver ai_engine=hold. That places this pool at #621 of 8541 raydium-amm pools: the ranking supports monitoring and conditional holding, not an unconditional entry signal. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, fee volume collapses, price divergence accelerates, or the pool becomes dependent on rewards; it would improve if fee volume and liquidity persist without a corresponding increase in concentration or exit risk.
Computed 2026-09-08 07:29 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$104.59K
Total value locked
$27.43K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up24.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -21.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can monitor actively, rebalance when the price approaches either outer boundary, and exit rather than widen the range if fee activity weakens materially from the current 0.26x volume-to-TVL baseline or pool liquidity begins draining.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 24.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 21.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $27.43K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $68.57 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 ATLAS-RAY pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1065 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2777 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ATLAS-RAY liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ATLAS and RAY into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your final holdings can contain more of one token and less of the other than if you had simply held both, especially when their prices move apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 24.0% decomposes into a fee-only APR of 21.5% and a reward-only APR of 2.5%. 90% of the yield comes from trading fees, with no current reward component represented in the quoted APR. Reward timing and emission persistence are not established, so the fee stream should be treated as the primary economic basis for the position.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so the position's realized divergence and range utilization cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, ATLAS-RAY is exposed to abrupt ATLAS or RAY price moves, shallow liquidity effects, and rapid sentiment-driven volume changes. Emission decay and lifecycle status are unknown; an LP should therefore plan exit timing around weakening fee volume, liquidity withdrawal, or a sharp change in either token rather than assuming incentives will persist.
tollATLAS Context
ATLAS is one side of this ATLAS-RAY pool, so an ATLAS price move relative to RAY changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss versus simply holding the tokens. The supplied pool metrics do not establish ATLAS's liquidity depth elsewhere; thinner external liquidity would increase the potential effect of price gaps and difficult exits.
tollRAY Context
RAY is the other side of the ATLAS-RAY pool and provides the reference asset against which ATLAS is priced here. The supplied metrics do not establish RAY's liquidity depth elsewhere, while a RAY move independent of ATLAS can also alter the LP's inventory and increase divergence risk.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ATLAS and RAY into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your final holdings can contain more of one token and less of the other than if you had simply held both, especially when their prices move apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- F73euqPynBwrgcZn3fNSEneSnYasDQohPM5aZazW9hp2
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- ATLAS (ATLASXmb…)
- Token B
- RAY (4k3Dyjzv…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
369%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The quoted total APR is 24.0%, made up of 21.5% in fees and 2.5% in rewards, with 90% of yield from trading fees. Because the pool's lifecycle and reward persistence are unknown, any future emission decay would mainly matter if a reward component is introduced or changes; current returns are fee-dependent.
The quoted total APR is 24.0%, made up of 21.5% in fees and 2.5% in rewards, with 90% of yield from trading fees. Because the pool's lifecycle and reward persistence are unknown, any future emission decay would mainly matter if a reward component is introduced or changes; current returns are fee-dependent.
There is no current reward component represented in the quoted APR, so the immediate basis for return is 21.5% in fees within the 24.0% total APR. If incentives are later added and then expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees and the pool's 0.26x volume-to-TVL activity, while liquidity could decline if reward-seeking capital exits.
There is no current reward component represented in the quoted APR, so the immediate basis for return is 21.5% in fees within the 24.0% total APR. If incentives are later added and then expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees and the pool's 0.26x volume-to-TVL activity, while liquidity could decline if reward-seeking capital exits.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain lifecycle, and the possibility of abrupt ATLAS or RAY price moves. The pool has $105K in TVL and $27K in 24h volume, so liquidity and fee generation can change quickly; recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain lifecycle, and the possibility of abrupt ATLAS or RAY price moves. The pool has $105K in TVL and $27K in 24h volume, so liquidity and fee generation can change quickly; recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable.
Consider exiting when pool liquidity drains, fee volume falls materially below the current 0.26x volume-to-TVL baseline, either token develops a sharp one-way move, or the position repeatedly leaves its usable range. For ATLAS-RAY, unknown lifecycle and emission conditions make a predefined exit rule more reliable than waiting for incentives to justify staying.
Consider exiting when pool liquidity drains, fee volume falls materially below the current 0.26x volume-to-TVL baseline, either token develops a sharp one-way move, or the position repeatedly leaves its usable range. For ATLAS-RAY, unknown lifecycle and emission conditions make a predefined exit rule more reliable than waiting for incentives to justify staying.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. The nominal 24.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery rate; actual break-even depends on sustained 21.5% fee generation, price divergence, and the time spent in range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. The nominal 24.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery rate; actual break-even depends on sustained 21.5% fee generation, price divergence, and the time spent in range.
