new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 53/100 produces an Enter score of 48/100, Hold score of 60/100, and Exit score of 21/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates a neutral assessment rather than a strong entry signal: the pool ranks #834 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, while its fee-led return must be weighed against memecoin price risk and uncertain range data. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, falling volume, or collapse in fee APR, and could improve if liquidity and fee generation remain stable without requiring emissions.
Computed 2026-09-07 03:30 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$857.07K
Total value locked
$264.94K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up34.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -81.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range that can tolerate the expected SOL/NPC volatility, and rebalance or exit when price reaches either range boundary while volume weakens or the fee rate falls materially below the level implied by 29.9%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 34.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 29.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $264.94K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $662.34 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-NPC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#829 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2024 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-NPC liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NPC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if SOL and NPC move by different amounts.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated Total APR of 34.8% decomposes into 29.9% from trading fees and 4.9% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 86%, so the return currently depends on sustained swap activity rather than emissions. Reward timing cannot be assessed from the available pool data, and the reward dependency classification is unknown.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-NPC carries sharp relative-price and liquidity risks: fee income can fall if trading activity fades, while one-sided price movement can leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset. Emission decay is not currently the stated return driver, but exit timing still matters because memecoin liquidity can deteriorate before an LP can rebalance efficiently.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than NPC. SOL strength or weakness versus NPC changes the pool's asset mix through rebalancing: a sustained SOL move can increase exposure to NPC for the LP, while a rapid reversal can amplify mark-to-market losses.
tollNPC Context
NPC is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity depth and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other concentrated venues than SOL's. A sharp NPC rally can cause the LP to sell NPC into SOL, while an NPC decline can leave the position increasingly exposed to NPC as its relative value falls.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NPC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if SOL and NPC move by different amounts.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FAn5gzoJMYriKeCoJzLTCepE9Y36oN3CidoF4dmgFNh9
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- NPC (BeGY8KqK…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
48%
APR
126%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 4.9%, while fee income is 29.9% and total APR is 34.8%. Because the stated return is fee-led, emission decay does not currently explain the APR, but future incentives or a change in trading volume could alter the mix.
The current reward component is 4.9%, while fee income is 29.9% and total APR is 34.8%. Because the stated return is fee-led, emission decay does not currently explain the APR, but future incentives or a change in trading volume could alter the mix.
The stated reward-only APR is 4.9%, so there is no current reward component to remove from the quoted return. After any incentive change, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 29.9% and supported by fee sustainability of 86%.
The stated reward-only APR is 4.9%, so there is no current reward component to remove from the quoted return. After any incentive change, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 29.9% and supported by fee sustainability of 86%.
Risk is elevated because NPC can move sharply against SOL and its liquidity may be less resilient than SOL's broader market liquidity. This pool has TVL of $857K, volume of $265K, and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.31x, but recent impermanent-loss and range-use readings are unavailable.
Risk is elevated because NPC can move sharply against SOL and its liquidity may be less resilient than SOL's broader market liquidity. This pool has TVL of $857K, volume of $265K, and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.31x, but recent impermanent-loss and range-use readings are unavailable.
For SOL-NPC, consider exiting when NPC liquidity or trading volume deteriorates, when the fee return implied by 29.9% falls materially, or when price reaches the edge of your chosen range and the pool becomes increasingly exposed to one asset. A sustained TVL decline would also weaken the case for remaining in the position.
For SOL-NPC, consider exiting when NPC liquidity or trading volume deteriorates, when the fee return implied by 29.9% falls materially, or when price reaches the edge of your chosen range and the pool becomes increasingly exposed to one asset. A sustained TVL decline would also weaken the case for remaining in the position.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. 34.8% is an annualized estimate rather than a guarantee, and actual break-even depends on future fees, SOL/NPC price divergence, range management, and liquidity conditions.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. 34.8% is an annualized estimate rather than a guarantee, and actual break-even depends on future fees, SOL/NPC price divergence, range management, and liquidity conditions.
