Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID and the pool ranks #1207 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates a middle-ground assessment: fee-funded yield and current pool conditions are not sufficient for an entry signal, but the available data does not produce an exit signal either. The assessment would worsen if TVL drained, the 0.04x volume-to-TVL ratio fell, or fee yield collapsed; it could improve if sustained volume increased without a comparable rise in liquidity risk.
Computed 2026-10-21 10:14 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$834.25K
Total value locked
$29.72K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit rule tied to pool conditions: reduce or close the position if the live verdict changes from AVOID to Exit, or if the rendered 0.04x declines materially from its entry level. Because recent tick-range data is unavailable, do not size the position on an assumed concentrated-liquidity range; reassess after meaningful SOL or NPC price moves.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $29.72K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $74.30 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-NPC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3838 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8133 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-NPC liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NPC into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your result depends on those fees, the prices of both tokens, and whether one token falls sharply relative to the other; there is currently no reward component supporting the displayed APR.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 3.5% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards, with 98% of yield attributed to trading fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission schedules are not supporting the stated APR; any future reward program would change the mix and could introduce dependence on emissions. The fee APR should therefore be evaluated against realized volume, not treated as a fixed return.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be verified from these metrics. SOL-NPC is a MEMECOIN pool: sharp NPC repricing, SOL volatility, thin exit liquidity, and adverse price divergence can overwhelm collected fees. Emission decay is a secondary risk while the reward component is zero, but any future incentives would require an explicit exit plan before emissions decline or cease.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the larger-liquidity asset in the pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than NPC. For this LP, a SOL move against NPC changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. SOL price volatility also affects the dollar value of both deposited assets and the fee revenue measured in dollars.
tollNPC Context
NPC is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity depth and price discovery are likely more venue-dependent than SOL's. A rapid NPC repricing can shift the position toward the weaker asset while arbitrage restores the pool price, creating impermanent loss relative to simply holding SOL and NPC. Thin external liquidity can also make exits more price-sensitive during stress.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NPC into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your result depends on those fees, the prices of both tokens, and whether one token falls sharply relative to the other; there is currently no reward component supporting the displayed APR.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FAn5gzoJMYriKeCoJzLTCepE9Y36oN3CidoF4dmgFNh9
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- NPC (BeGY8KqK…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
23%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.1%, so the displayed 3.6% APR is presently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward portion while leaving 3.5% dependent on trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.1%, so the displayed 3.6% APR is presently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward portion while leaving 3.5% dependent on trading volume.
With rewards currently contributing 0.1%, an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed APR. Future fee income would still depend on swap activity and the pool's 0.04x volume-to-TVL ratio, while any incentive-supported return would fall to zero.
With rewards currently contributing 0.1%, an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed APR. Future fee income would still depend on swap activity and the pool's 0.04x volume-to-TVL ratio, while any incentive-supported return would fall to zero.
The risk is material because NPC can move sharply against SOL and may have thinner external liquidity, producing impermanent loss and difficult exits. The pool offers 3.6% total APR from 98% fee-funded yield, but fees do not cap token-price or liquidity risk.
The risk is material because NPC can move sharply against SOL and may have thinner external liquidity, producing impermanent loss and difficult exits. The pool offers 3.6% total APR from 98% fee-funded yield, but fees do not cap token-price or liquidity risk.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a recovery: reassess or exit if the live verdict changes from AVOID to Exit, if TVL contracts materially, or if the 0.04x ratio declines enough that fee income no longer compensates for exposure. Also reassess before a known incentive change or when NPC liquidity deteriorates.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a recovery: reassess or exit if the live verdict changes from AVOID to Exit, if TVL contracts materially, or if the 0.04x ratio declines enough that fee income no longer compensates for exposure. Also reassess before a known incentive change or when NPC liquidity deteriorates.
There is no defensible fixed break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. At the current fee-only rate of 3.5%, fees can offset a small divergence over time, but a large SOL-NPC move may require substantially longer than the annualized fee figure suggests.
There is no defensible fixed break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. At the current fee-only rate of 3.5%, fees can offset a small divergence over time, but a large SOL-NPC move may require substantially longer than the annualized fee figure suggests.
