new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, ranked #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools; ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. This indicates that the pool is not being rejected solely because it lacks rewards: its low activity, limited liquidity, and pool-specific risk profile are the central concerns. The assessment would improve with sustained volume growth, deeper TVL, a non-critical scanner result, and a score moving above the hold threshold; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit view.
Computed 2026-10-05 17:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$51.12K
Total value locked
$87.00
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -20.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range and rebalance when the SOL/SOLX price exits it; exit the position rather than widening the range if the scanner remains CRITICAL while 0.00x stays weak or TVL declines.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $87.00 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.22 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-SOLX pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5933 of 80377 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 9% of all Solana pools
overall rank #10998 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SOLX liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SOLX into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You may receive trading fees, but your holdings can become worth less than simply holding the two tokens, especially if SOLX moves sharply or trading activity falls.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 0.1% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, with 100% of yield coming from trading fees. Reward dependency is unknown, and there is currently no reward component contributing to the stated APR; therefore, emission decay is not the present source of yield erosion. The fee return depends on trading volume remaining sufficient relative to $51K.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are unavailable, so neither realized IL nor range utilization can be assessed from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SOLX carries sharp price-dislocation risk, thin-liquidity risk, and potential emission decay if incentives are introduced later. Exit timing should be driven by deteriorating volume, a TVL drain, or persistent critical scanner output rather than waiting for an emission schedule to recover.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool provides. A SOL price move against SOLX changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. The relevant risk is the relative SOL/SOLX move and the ability to exit this specific pool without excessive price impact.
tollSOLX Context
SOLX is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price and external liquidity are likely to be more fragmented than SOL's and should be checked separately. A sharp SOLX move can dominate the pair's inventory changes and make the position difficult to rebalance at a favorable price. External SOLX liquidity does not remove the execution and adverse-selection risks inside this pool.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SOLX into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You may receive trading fees, but your holdings can become worth less than simply holding the two tokens, especially if SOLX moves sharply or trading activity falls.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FBePpA9ZuAxQm6HqGi8ZvG7cj8utoRRmgSmpj5xnENN5
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SOLX (Cf2LnRpm…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
20%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
29%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated 0.1% APR is currently driven by fees rather than emissions. If incentives are added later, MEMECOIN emissions can decay and reduce APR quickly unless trading fees increase.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated 0.1% APR is currently driven by fees rather than emissions. If incentives are added later, MEMECOIN emissions can decay and reduce APR quickly unless trading fees increase.
There is no reward component currently contributing to the quoted APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove the existing fee-only source represented by 0.1%. The pool would still depend on trading volume and 100% fee sustainability, with $51K exposed to liquidity and price risks.
There is no reward component currently contributing to the quoted APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove the existing fee-only source represented by 0.1%. The pool would still depend on trading volume and 100% fee sustainability, with $51K exposed to liquidity and price risks.
Risk is elevated because SOLX can move sharply, external liquidity may be fragmented, and this pool has weak activity relative to its liquidity at 0.00x. Recent IL and range-use records are unavailable, so the realized impact cannot be quantified from the supplied data.
Risk is elevated because SOLX can move sharply, external liquidity may be fragmented, and this pool has weak activity relative to its liquidity at 0.00x. Recent IL and range-use records are unavailable, so the realized impact cannot be quantified from the supplied data.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible when the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume weakens, or TVL falls, particularly while the live verdict is EXIT. Do not wait for hypothetical emissions to compensate for deteriorating fee generation.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible when the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume weakens, or TVL falls, particularly while the live verdict is EXIT. Do not wait for hypothetical emissions to compensate for deteriorating fee generation.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent IL history is unavailable and the pool's fee income depends on variable volume. The only stated return is 0.1% in fee-only APR, while 0.0% comes from rewards, so any recovery estimate requires an assumed SOL/SOLX path and future trading volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent IL history is unavailable and the pool's fee income depends on variable volume. The only stated return is 0.1% in fee-only APR, while 0.0% comes from rewards, so any recovery estimate requires an assumed SOL/SOLX path and future trading volume.
