WealthVille
TTWO
T
GTA6
G

TTWO-GTA6on Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $210.84K
APR
500.0% APR
24h Volume
$37.91K 24h vol
Fee tier
4.00% fee
Pool address
FDamUzyi…hLd2 · observed 2026-10-22
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100 supports a neutral holding assessment rather than a strong entry signal. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1254 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not establishing superior risk-adjusted performance. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee-generating volume weakened, the fee APR collapsed, or reliable range and IL data showed persistent deterioration; sustained fee activity and stable liquidity would support the current view.

Computed 2026-10-22 12:40 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$210.84K

Total value locked

$37.91K

24h volume

×0.2 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

500.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 473.5%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

4.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 30m agoTVL ↓16.3%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

warningElevated risk score: 90/100
tips_and_updates

Use a monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position: set a hard exit trigger below the current $211K or when 0.18x weakens materially, and rebalance only after checking whether both tokens still trade actively near the selected range.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR500.0%——
Fee APR300.3%——
Volume$37.91K——
Fees Earned$1.55K——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
573.5%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−100.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
473.5%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.18x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0074
Fee APR Sustainability
60% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 TTWO-GTA6 pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#170 of 19264 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1179 of 147092

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the TTWO-GTA6 liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing TTWO and GTA6 into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of each token you hold can change, and a large price move can leave you with more of the weaker-performing asset.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into 300.3% from trading fees and 199.7% from rewards, with 60% of yield sourced from trading fees. Reward duration is not established, so the fee component is the relevant basis for assessing persistence; the displayed APR can still contract if volume or liquidity changes.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity that remained in range are not currently reported, so realized IL and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, TTWO-GTA6 is exposed to sharp, asymmetric price moves, which can shift the position out of range and leave one token dominant. Emission decay is not the primary stated risk here because rewards are absent, but exit timing remains important: fee income may not compensate for a rapid price divergence or a decline in trading activity.

tollTTWO Context

TTWO is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, so the LP holds exposure to TTWO price movement through the pool rather than simply holding a fixed token balance. Liquidity depth for TTWO elsewhere is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp TTWO move can push the position out of range and change its inventory toward GTA6.

tollGTA6 Context

GTA6 is the other asset in the pair and determines how the LP's inventory shifts when its price moves relative to TTWO. Liquidity depth for GTA6 elsewhere is not established here; thin external liquidity or abrupt price action can increase execution impact and accelerate range exit.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing TTWO and GTA6 into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of each token you hold can change, and a large price move can leave you with more of the weaker-performing asset.

token

Token Details

TTWO
TTWOSolana
Explorer

TTWO is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

GTA6
GTA6Solana
Explorer

GTA6 is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
FDamUzyiEA7Cq1VNiQcbhuHpfCmmcJfgA6DwQQ1hhLd2
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
TTWO (TTWofwAg…)
Token B
GTA6 (4kjruqGH…)
Created
8/7/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

This pool reports 199.7% in reward APR, so emission decay is not currently the main source of its displayed 500.0% APR. The fee component, 300.3%, depends on trading activity and can change as volume or liquidity changes.

This pool reports 199.7% in reward APR, so emission decay is not currently the main source of its displayed 500.0% APR. The fee component, 300.3%, depends on trading activity and can change as volume or liquidity changes.

The reported reward component is already 199.7%, while 60% of yield comes from trading fees. If any unreported incentive ends, the direct effect should be limited, but the position still depends on fee income from trading volume.

The reported reward component is already 199.7%, while 60% of yield comes from trading fees. If any unreported incentive ends, the direct effect should be limited, but the position still depends on fee income from trading volume.

Risk is high in kind because both assets are in the MEMECOIN family and can move sharply relative to one another. The pool has $211K in liquidity and a 0.18x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent IL and in-range history are not established by the supplied data.

Risk is high in kind because both assets are in the MEMECOIN family and can move sharply relative to one another. The pool has $211K in liquidity and a 0.18x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent IL and in-range history are not established by the supplied data.

Consider exiting when $211K falls materially, 0.18x weakens, or price action leaves your selected range and fee income no longer justifies the exposure. A sustained decline in 300.3% is a direct warning because the pool has no reported reward contribution.

Consider exiting when $211K falls materially, 0.18x weakens, or price action leaves your selected range and fee income no longer justifies the exposure. A sustained decline in 300.3% is a direct warning because the pool has no reported reward contribution.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent IL history is not reported and fee income changes with volume. 300.3% is the relevant offset, but it should not be treated as a fixed recovery rate for price divergence.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent IL history is not reported and fee income changes with volume. 300.3% is the relevant offset, but it should not be treated as a fixed recovery rate for price divergence.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights