WealthVille
RTP
R
PGS
P

RTP-PGSon Raydium CLMMCLMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $57.93K
APR
0.3% APR
24h Volume
$110.28 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
FGjKoDWX…94tQ · observed 2026-10-26
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT because the verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1667 among 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools, but the score does not imply strong momentum: the position is better treated as a hold while fees remain observable and liquidity is stable. A material TVL drain, collapse in trading volume or fee yield, worsening price divergence, or a change in the model's driver could change that assessment.

Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$57.93K

Total value locked

$110.28

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.3%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -9.8%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 343m agoTVL ↑1.0%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 88/100
tips_and_updates

Use a deliberately narrow range only if you can monitor it frequently; otherwise choose a wider range and set an exit trigger for a sustained move outside the active band or a material decline in trading volume, rather than waiting for fee income to recover.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.3%——
Fee APR0.3%——
Volume$110.28——
Fees Earned$0.29——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.9%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−10.7%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-9.8%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#2 of 2 RTP-PGS pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1427 of 19497 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 13% of all Solana pools

overall rank #18841 of 148664

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RTP-PGS liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing RTP and PGS into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If either token moves sharply relative to the other, your final token mix can be worth less than simply holding both, and the limited trading activity may not compensate for that difference.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The pool's yield decomposes into 0.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives, with 100% of yield coming from fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not reducing the displayed APR at present; the relevant risk is that fee income may weaken if trading activity falls.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent 7-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so realized short-term loss cannot be used to validate the pool's risk profile. The 7-day share of liquidity kept inside the selected range is also unreported, leaving range exposure unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, RTP-PGS remains exposed to sharp relative price moves, thin liquidity, and emission decay or incentive changes; an LP should set exit timing before volatility or liquidity deterioration makes rebalancing costly.

tollRTP Context

RTP is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position and is exchanged against PGS within the selected price range. The supplied pool metrics do not establish RTP's liquidity depth elsewhere, so an RTP price move can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss even when fee income continues.

tollPGS Context

PGS is the counter-asset paired with RTP, and its relative price determines where the LP's position remains active. Broader PGS liquidity is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp PGS move or thin external market can push the position out of range and concentrate exposure in one token.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing RTP and PGS into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If either token moves sharply relative to the other, your final token mix can be worth less than simply holding both, and the limited trading activity may not compensate for that difference.

token

Token Details

RTP
RTPRetro PekingSolana
Explorer

Retro Peking (RTP) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

PGS
PGSSolana
Explorer

PGS is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
FGjKoDWXcZs5FNF1JCRUHjyWNK9NH4wWmN3cpLq94tQ
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
RTP (71AzivpY…)
Token B
PGS (FquQysvq…)
Created
6/24/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

RTP-PGS currently shows 0.0% from rewards, so emission decay is not currently the source of an APR reduction. The displayed 0.3% is supported by 0.3%, making future fee volume more important than reward emissions.

RTP-PGS currently shows 0.0% from rewards, so emission decay is not currently the source of an APR reduction. The displayed 0.3% is supported by 0.3%, making future fee volume more important than reward emissions.

Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful reward contribution from the displayed rate. The remaining return would depend on 0.3% and could fall if trading volume does not support it.

Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful reward contribution from the displayed rate. The remaining return would depend on 0.3% and could fall if trading volume does not support it.

Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity depth, and the possibility that price moves push the position outside its active range. RTP-PGS also has $58K TVL and $110 in 24h volume, so fees may be too limited to offset a large relative move between RTP and PGS.

Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity depth, and the possibility that price moves push the position outside its active range. RTP-PGS also has $58K TVL and $110 in 24h volume, so fees may be too limited to offset a large relative move between RTP and PGS.

Consider exiting when the position remains outside its intended range, pool liquidity drains, or fee activity no longer justifies the price and inventory risk. For RTP-PGS, a sustained deterioration from 0.00x volume-to-liquidity or a collapse in 0.3% would be concrete warning signals.

Consider exiting when the position remains outside its intended range, pool liquidity drains, or fee activity no longer justifies the price and inventory risk. For RTP-PGS, a sustained deterioration from 0.00x volume-to-liquidity or a collapse in 0.3% would be concrete warning signals.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. At 0.3%, any break-even estimate would still depend on the relative price path of RTP and PGS, the time spent in range, and whether $110 increases or declines.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. At 0.3%, any break-even estimate would still depend on the relative price path of RTP and PGS, the time spent in range, and whether $110 increases or declines.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights