
RTP-PGSon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $57.93K
- APR
- 0.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $110.28 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- FGjKoDWX…94tQ · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT because the verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1667 among 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools, but the score does not imply strong momentum: the position is better treated as a hold while fees remain observable and liquidity is stable. A material TVL drain, collapse in trading volume or fee yield, worsening price divergence, or a change in the model's driver could change that assessment.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$57.93K
Total value locked
$110.28
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -9.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range only if you can monitor it frequently; otherwise choose a wider range and set an exit trigger for a sustained move outside the active band or a material decline in trading volume, rather than waiting for fee income to recover.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $110.28 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 RTP-PGS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1427 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18841 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RTP-PGS liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing RTP and PGS into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If either token moves sharply relative to the other, your final token mix can be worth less than simply holding both, and the limited trading activity may not compensate for that difference.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield decomposes into 0.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives, with 100% of yield coming from fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not reducing the displayed APR at present; the relevant risk is that fee income may weaken if trading activity falls.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent 7-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so realized short-term loss cannot be used to validate the pool's risk profile. The 7-day share of liquidity kept inside the selected range is also unreported, leaving range exposure unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, RTP-PGS remains exposed to sharp relative price moves, thin liquidity, and emission decay or incentive changes; an LP should set exit timing before volatility or liquidity deterioration makes rebalancing costly.
tollRTP Context
RTP is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position and is exchanged against PGS within the selected price range. The supplied pool metrics do not establish RTP's liquidity depth elsewhere, so an RTP price move can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss even when fee income continues.
tollPGS Context
PGS is the counter-asset paired with RTP, and its relative price determines where the LP's position remains active. Broader PGS liquidity is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp PGS move or thin external market can push the position out of range and concentrate exposure in one token.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing RTP and PGS into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If either token moves sharply relative to the other, your final token mix can be worth less than simply holding both, and the limited trading activity may not compensate for that difference.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FGjKoDWXcZs5FNF1JCRUHjyWNK9NH4wWmN3cpLq94tQ
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- RTP (71AzivpY…)
- Token B
- PGS (FquQysvq…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
RTP-PGS currently shows 0.0% from rewards, so emission decay is not currently the source of an APR reduction. The displayed 0.3% is supported by 0.3%, making future fee volume more important than reward emissions.
RTP-PGS currently shows 0.0% from rewards, so emission decay is not currently the source of an APR reduction. The displayed 0.3% is supported by 0.3%, making future fee volume more important than reward emissions.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful reward contribution from the displayed rate. The remaining return would depend on 0.3% and could fall if trading volume does not support it.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful reward contribution from the displayed rate. The remaining return would depend on 0.3% and could fall if trading volume does not support it.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity depth, and the possibility that price moves push the position outside its active range. RTP-PGS also has $58K TVL and $110 in 24h volume, so fees may be too limited to offset a large relative move between RTP and PGS.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity depth, and the possibility that price moves push the position outside its active range. RTP-PGS also has $58K TVL and $110 in 24h volume, so fees may be too limited to offset a large relative move between RTP and PGS.
Consider exiting when the position remains outside its intended range, pool liquidity drains, or fee activity no longer justifies the price and inventory risk. For RTP-PGS, a sustained deterioration from 0.00x volume-to-liquidity or a collapse in 0.3% would be concrete warning signals.
Consider exiting when the position remains outside its intended range, pool liquidity drains, or fee activity no longer justifies the price and inventory risk. For RTP-PGS, a sustained deterioration from 0.00x volume-to-liquidity or a collapse in 0.3% would be concrete warning signals.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. At 0.3%, any break-even estimate would still depend on the relative price path of RTP and PGS, the time spent in range, and whether $110 increases or declines.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. At 0.3%, any break-even estimate would still depend on the relative price path of RTP and PGS, the time spent in range, and whether $110 increases or declines.




