new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 52/100 places SOL-OPAIUM in a mixed position: Enter is 50/100, Hold is 55/100, and Exit is 29/100, with the live verdict HOLD driven by ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #834 among 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a middling-to-weaker relative standing rather than a top-tier pool signal. The assessment would improve with durable volume growth, deeper TVL, and a fee rate supported by sustained trading; it would worsen with a TVL drain, lower volume, or a collapse in fee-derived APR.
Computed 2026-09-22 12:56 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$50.68K
Total value locked
$7.74K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up24.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow tick range only if the position can be monitored, and define an exit trigger around a sustained volume decline or visible OPAIUM liquidity drain rather than waiting for emissions to improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 24.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 21.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $7.74K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $19.35 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-OPAIUM pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1414 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3553 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-OPAIUM liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPAIUM into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token loses value, and the fee income may not offset that change.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 21.6% from trading fees and 2.5% from rewards. 90% of yield is fee-sourced, while reward dependency is not established and no time-bound reward schedule is currently available. The resulting 24.1% APR can decline if volume falls, particularly because the pool's 0.15x volume-to-TVL indicates limited fee generation relative to deposited liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Historical impermanent-loss reporting for this pool is not currently available, and tick-in-range history is also not reported, so recent price-path and range-management risk cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, OPAIUM can experience sharp repricing, fragmented exit liquidity, and rapid volume loss against SOL. Emission decay is an additional family-specific concern: even if incentives appear later, LPs should assess exit timing before emissions weaken or liquidity leaves.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's established reference asset and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pair provides. SOL price movement relative to OPAIUM determines the LP's inventory drift: a strong SOL move can increase impermanent loss even when fee income remains steady.
tollOPAIUM Context
OPAIUM is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery should not be assumed to match SOL's broader market depth. A sharp OPAIUM repricing, thin exit market, or fading attention can increase inventory imbalance and make realized losses larger than the fee APR suggests.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPAIUM into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token loses value, and the fee income may not offset that change.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FJUtc21eLo7k4E6eb86r5WB8ikD8Gizw3SJDPPoL7wjp
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- OPAIUM (4HuSTfcJ…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
359%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
20%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 2.5%, while fee income is 21.6% and total APR is 24.1%. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall; the current return is instead dependent on trading fees, with 90% of yield sourced from fees.
The current reward component is 2.5%, while fee income is 21.6% and total APR is 24.1%. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall; the current return is instead dependent on trading fees, with 90% of yield sourced from fees.
Because the current reward-only APR is 2.5%, expiration of incentives would not remove a presently material reward stream in this snapshot. LP returns would continue to depend on 21.6% in fees, which can decline if incentives previously supported trading volume.
Because the current reward-only APR is 2.5%, expiration of incentives would not remove a presently material reward stream in this snapshot. LP returns would continue to depend on 21.6% in fees, which can decline if incentives previously supported trading volume.
Risk is elevated because OPAIUM can reprice sharply, while the pool has $51K of liquidity and $8K in daily volume. Fee income is 21.6%, but unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings make the trade-off harder to quantify.
Risk is elevated because OPAIUM can reprice sharply, while the pool has $51K of liquidity and $8K in daily volume. Fee income is 21.6%, but unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings make the trade-off harder to quantify.
For SOL-OPAIUM, an exit review is warranted after a sustained fall in volume, a drain in TVL, a sharp OPAIUM move, or a deterioration in fee APR from 24.1%. Waiting for emissions is less relevant while reward APR is 2.5%.
For SOL-OPAIUM, an exit review is warranted after a sustained fall in volume, a drain in TVL, a sharp OPAIUM move, or a deterioration in fee APR from 24.1%. Waiting for emissions is less relevant while reward APR is 2.5%.
No reliable break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is not currently reported. At 24.1%, gross fee accrual may offset price divergence only if volume and liquidity remain stable; realized break-even also depends on entry prices, withdrawals, and OPAIUM's path against SOL.
No reliable break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is not currently reported. At 24.1%, gross fee accrual may offset price divergence only if volume and liquidity remain stable; realized break-even also depends on entry prices, withdrawals, and OPAIUM's path against SOL.
