new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 48/100 assigns Enter 41/100, Hold 56/100, and Exit 24/100, with a live verdict of HOLD. That result is consistent with the stated drivers: high risk at 60/100 combined with weak yield, despite the pool ranking #602 of 2403 raydium-amm pools. The ranking is relative and does not remove the pool-specific concerns; the assessment would worsen with a material TVL drain, lower volume, or fee-yield collapse, and would improve only if sustained volume and liquidity increased without a corresponding rise in risk.
Computed 2026-07-24 06:13 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$215.69K
Total value locked
$6.93K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -28.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with active monitoring: use a deliberately narrow range around the current SOL-LABUBU price, rebalance when the position is materially one-sided or falls out of range, and exit if pool liquidity drains or fee activity weakens enough that the fee-only return no longer justifies memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.93K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $17.32 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 8 SOL-LABUBU pools
by AI Farmer Score
#761 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2455 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LABUBU liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LABUBU into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart, especially because LABUBU is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 3.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 98%. The pool is therefore dependent on trading activity rather than emissions for its stated return. Reward dependency and the remaining reward duration are not established, so future incentive changes should not be treated as a predictable source of yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
A current seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LABUBU also carries emission-decay risk, abrupt liquidity withdrawal, and asymmetric exit timing: an LP may need to leave before trading activity or token demand deteriorates, rather than wait for rewards to compensate. The reported risk score of 60/100 reinforces that the 3.1% return does not adequately offset those uncertainties.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than LABUBU. For this LP, SOL price movement relative to LABUBU changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when the two assets diverge, even if SOL's broader market liquidity makes its leg easier to hedge or exit.
tollLABUBU Context
LABUBU is the concentrated memecoin risk in the pair, with liquidity and demand potentially changing faster than SOL's. A sharp LABUBU repricing, weakening market depth, or loss of attention can leave the LP holding more LABUBU while fee income falls, increasing the importance of exit timing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LABUBU into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart, especially because LABUBU is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FYAnFcdjkcfAkbtZqixnTqNVLoDjJft82L5FFgPaSWe3
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LABUBU (JB2wezZL…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 3.1%, composed of 3.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the displayed APR is currently fee-led. If future emissions are introduced or reduced, they could change the reward component, but the reward schedule and dependency are not established.
The current return is 3.1%, composed of 3.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the displayed APR is currently fee-led. If future emissions are introduced or reduced, they could change the reward component, but the reward schedule and dependency are not established.
The reward component would fall away or remain absent, leaving trading fees as the practical yield source. Since the pool already shows 3.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, incentive expiry would matter less than whether $7K of daily volume can persist against $216K of liquidity.
The reward component would fall away or remain absent, leaving trading fees as the practical yield source. Since the pool already shows 3.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, incentive expiry would matter less than whether $7K of daily volume can persist against $216K of liquidity.
The pool's risk score is 60/100, and LABUBU can lose demand or liquidity much faster than SOL. That can produce impermanent loss, one-sided inventory, and difficult exits even when the fee APR is 3.0%.
The pool's risk score is 60/100, and LABUBU can lose demand or liquidity much faster than SOL. That can produce impermanent loss, one-sided inventory, and difficult exits even when the fee APR is 3.0%.
For SOL-LABUBU, an exit signal is a material TVL drain, declining swap activity, a worsening price divergence, or a range that remains inactive while the fee return no longer compensates for risk. Do not rely on emissions as an exit justification because reward duration is not established.
For SOL-LABUBU, an exit signal is a material TVL drain, declining swap activity, a worsening price divergence, or a range that remains inactive while the fee return no longer compensates for risk. Do not rely on emissions as an exit justification because reward duration is not established.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool lacks a reported seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history. At the stated 3.0% fee APR, recovery depends on sustained volume, the size and duration of SOL-LABUBU price divergence, and whether the position remains active in its range.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool lacks a reported seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history. At the stated 3.0% fee APR, recovery depends on sustained volume, the size and duration of SOL-LABUBU price divergence, and whether the position remains active in its range.
