new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT. The unopposed strong EXIT signal and a rank of #17236 of 18146 raydium-amm pools indicate that the model views fee durability, liquidity quality, or both as materially weak relative to the pool set, not merely that the APR is volatile. The assessment would improve only with sustained fee-producing volume, stable or rising TVL, and evidence that the pool remains usable through memecoin price movements; a TVL drain, yield collapse, or worsening liquidity would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-13 02:21 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$127.77K
Total value locked
$387.61
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up42.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -10.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range only if you can monitor it frequently, and set an automatic exit or rebalance rule if 0.00x deteriorates from its current reading for two consecutive days or if pool TVL begins draining; do not wait for emissions data to clarify the risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 42.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 35.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $387.61 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $9.69 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 GABLE-ESF pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 85203 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 141086
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GABLE-ESF liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GABLE and ESF into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the token that falls in relative value, and withdrawing may return less than holding the tokens separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 42.4% decomposes into a fee-only APR of 35.3% and a reward-only APR of 7.0%. 83% of yield comes from trading fees, so the quoted return depends on future volume and fee generation rather than an identified emissions schedule. Reward dependency and lifecycle data are not established, so the persistence of any non-fee incentive cannot be assessed.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the seven-day tick-in-range measurement are unavailable, so realized price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GABLE-ESF carries substantial token-price and liquidity-exit risk; any emission decay would remove support for LP returns, making exit timing important if trading fees weaken or liquidity leaves.
tollGABLE Context
GABLE is one side of this memecoin pair, so an LP receives exposure to GABLE price changes relative to ESF in addition to fee income. Liquidity depth for GABLE elsewhere is not established here; a sharp GABLE move or thin external liquidity can increase inventory imbalance and make withdrawal value diverge from the initial deposit.
tollESF Context
ESF is the other side of the pair and determines the relative-price exposure that drives the pool's inventory mix. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so an ESF selloff, rally, or reduction in external market depth can increase rebalancing pressure and impermanent-loss risk for this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GABLE and ESF into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the token that falls in relative value, and withdrawing may return less than holding the tokens separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FZvBj7kcNqMG6aKUQegXK9NBWUwntBR8wdnEiiZkkLKP
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GABLE (9uTekAxm…)
- Token B
- ESF (BzMWbt7k…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
24%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
28%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently attributes 7.0% to rewards and 35.3% to fees, so any future decay in emissions would mainly matter if rewards are introduced or are included in the quoted return later. Fee income would still depend on trading volume, with total APR shown as 42.4%.
The pool currently attributes 7.0% to rewards and 35.3% to fees, so any future decay in emissions would mainly matter if rewards are introduced or are included in the quoted return later. Fee income would still depend on trading volume, with total APR shown as 42.4%.
No reward APR is currently attributed, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently identified reward component. If incentives are introduced and then expire, the remaining return would depend on fees, currently represented by 35.3%, and could fall if the pool's low activity persists.
No reward APR is currently attributed, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently identified reward component. If incentives are introduced and then expire, the remaining return would depend on fees, currently represented by 35.3%, and could fall if the pool's low activity persists.
Risk is high because both assets are in the MEMECOIN family, external liquidity depth is not established, and recent impermanent-loss and range-use measurements are unavailable. The position is therefore exposed to sharp relative-price moves, inventory imbalance, and difficulty exiting during weak liquidity.
Risk is high because both assets are in the MEMECOIN family, external liquidity depth is not established, and recent impermanent-loss and range-use measurements are unavailable. The position is therefore exposed to sharp relative-price moves, inventory imbalance, and difficulty exiting during weak liquidity.
For this pool, use a predefined exit rule when fee-producing activity weakens, TVL drains, or 0.00x falls further for multiple consecutive days. The current EXIT and rank of #17236 of 18146 support treating deteriorating volume or liquidity as an exit signal rather than waiting for emissions to compensate.
For this pool, use a predefined exit rule when fee-producing activity weakens, TVL drains, or 0.00x falls further for multiple consecutive days. The current EXIT and rank of #17236 of 18146 support treating deteriorating volume or liquidity as an exit signal rather than waiting for emissions to compensate.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on thin activity. 42.4% is only a forward-looking rate; actual recovery would require sustained fees and a relative-price path that does not deepen the LP's token imbalance.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on thin activity. 42.4% is only a forward-looking rate; actual recovery would require sustained fees and a relative-price path that does not deepen the LP's token imbalance.
