new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
44/100 with Enter 38/100 / Hold 51/100 / Exit 29/100 produces a live HOLD assessment, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its #171-of-889 rank among meteora-damm-v2 pools places it above many peers but does not establish that the pool is safer or more durable than alternatives. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee volume collapsed, the fee-led APR fell materially, or new rewards created a temporary but time-bound incentive; sustained volume and stable liquidity would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-09-11 00:06 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$718.77K
Total value locked
$25.30K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up10.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -8.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded NEST/SOL range and rebalance only when price approaches either boundary; exit rather than widen the range if swap activity weakens while TVL drains. This limits exposure to a passive position after the fee flow that supports 10.7% has deteriorated.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 10.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 10.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $25.30K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $204.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 3 NEST-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#247 of 1877 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5225 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NEST-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEST and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward one token as prices move, and the value of the two tokens together can underperform simply holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 10.2% from trading fees and 0.5% from rewards, with 95% attributed to fees. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward component does not provide a separate emissions-based return. Because this is a MEMECOIN pool, fee APR can fall quickly if trading activity or liquidity demand declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also unavailable, so the position's realized price-range behavior cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, NEST-SOL carries sharp repricing, liquidity withdrawal, and one-sided-flow risk. Emission decay is relevant even though the current reward component is absent; exit timing should be based on weakening volume, shrinking liquidity, or a loss of orderly NEST/SOL pricing rather than waiting for incentives to recover.
tollNEST Context
NEST is the memecoin leg of this pool, so an increase in NEST price relative to SOL can leave an LP with less NEST and more SOL after rebalancing, while a sharp decline can create the opposite inventory effect. Liquidity depth for NEST outside this pair is not established by the supplied data, so exits may be more sensitive to local pool liquidity than SOL exits. NEST price action is therefore the primary driver of inventory divergence and impermanent-loss risk for this position.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the paired asset and the more established reference for valuing NEST in this market. SOL's broader ecosystem liquidity does not guarantee executable depth in this specific pool, whose LP outcome still depends on NEST/SOL flow and available liquidity here. A strong SOL move can produce the same inventory rebalancing effect as a NEST move, expressed through the pair's relative price.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEST and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward one token as prices move, and the value of the two tokens together can underperform simply holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FpqhEG281t5Bi6yT782ieQkpzmPMRyBY5oirK1rcwCH1
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- NEST (68Nq68Cr…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
6%
APR
500%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current display separates 10.7% into 10.2% fees and 0.5% rewards, so there is no meaningful reward component currently supporting the APR. If emissions are introduced and later decay, that portion would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current display separates 10.7% into 10.2% fees and 0.5% rewards, so there is no meaningful reward component currently supporting the APR. If emissions are introduced and later decay, that portion would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The stated reward component is 0.5%, while 95% of the displayed yield comes from trading fees. If incentives expire, the pool should be evaluated primarily on whether fee activity can sustain 10.2% rather than on the former headline APR.
The stated reward component is 0.5%, while 95% of the displayed yield comes from trading fees. If incentives expire, the pool should be evaluated primarily on whether fee activity can sustain 10.2% rather than on the former headline APR.
Risk is elevated because NEST can reprice sharply, local liquidity can contract, and the position's token mix changes as NEST/SOL moves. The absence of a recent measured impermanent-loss and tick-range history makes the realized exposure harder to quantify, while $719K TVL and 0.04x volume-to-TVL indicate that fee generation depends on continued activity.
Risk is elevated because NEST can reprice sharply, local liquidity can contract, and the position's token mix changes as NEST/SOL moves. The absence of a recent measured impermanent-loss and tick-range history makes the realized exposure harder to quantify, while $719K TVL and 0.04x volume-to-TVL indicate that fee generation depends on continued activity.
Exit when NEST/SOL approaches the edge of the chosen range and the pool no longer compensates for the added inventory risk, or when TVL and fee-generating volume weaken materially. For this pool, a fall in fee-led income below 10.2% would undermine the basis for holding the position.
Exit when NEST/SOL approaches the edge of the chosen range and the pool no longer compensates for the added inventory risk, or when TVL and fee-generating volume weaken materially. For this pool, a fall in fee-led income below 10.2% would undermine the basis for holding the position.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. 10.2% is an annualized fee estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset price divergence over any fixed holding period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. 10.2% is an annualized fee estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset price divergence over any fixed holding period.
