new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 43/100 places SOL-ALCH above its Enter score of 37/100 but below its Hold score of 49/100, resulting in the live verdict HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #834 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively stronger position within the tracked pool set, but not a conclusion that the pool is low risk: the score is supported by fee-derived yield and current activity, while memecoin volatility and incomplete historical risk data remain material gaps. A TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; durable liquidity and fee generation would be needed to improve it.
Computed 2026-09-07 17:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$2.50M
Total value locked
$97.01K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -4.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a defined SOL/ALCH price range around the entry price and rebalance when price leaves that range; exit if pool liquidity contracts materially or trading activity no longer supports 3.2%. Do not treat the zero reward component as a buffer against weaker fee generation.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $97.01K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $242.53 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-ALCH pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3176 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6863 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ALCH liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALCH into a shared pool used by traders, while receiving part of the swap fees. Your holdings automatically shift between the two tokens, so you can end up with more of the weaker-performing token and lose value relative to simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 3.2% from swap fees and 0.1% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 98%, so the return profile depends on continued SOL-ALCH trading volume and liquidity demand rather than reward emissions. Because reward APR is currently zero, emission decay is not the immediate source of yield compression; a decline in volume would be more consequential.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent divergence losses and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ALCH has elevated price-divergence and liquidity-exit risk: a sharp ALCH repricing can leave the LP with more of the weaker asset, while reduced trading can lower fee income. Emission decay and exit timing matter because memecoin liquidity can contract before an LP can exit at a favorable price.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. SOL price moves relative to ALCH determine the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when the position earns 3.2% in fees. SOL strength against ALCH would typically leave the LP holding a greater share of ALCH after rebalancing.
tollALCH Context
ALCH is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more concentrated than SOL's across Solana markets. A sharp ALCH rally or decline against SOL changes the LP's inventory and can increase divergence loss; thin external liquidity can also make exit execution more difficult. Its volatility is therefore a primary determinant of whether fee income compensates for inventory rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALCH into a shared pool used by traders, while receiving part of the swap fees. Your holdings automatically shift between the two tokens, so you can end up with more of the weaker-performing token and lose value relative to simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FyDF3vKQFbcvNTsBi7L7LremrFPmXKbQqgAgnPg1hXXd
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ALCH (HNg5PYJm…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
48%
APR
126%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOL-ALCH currently shows 0.1% from rewards, so emission decay does not directly reduce the stated APR at present. The reported 3.3% is instead composed of 3.2%, making trading volume the key variable.
SOL-ALCH currently shows 0.1% from rewards, so emission decay does not directly reduce the stated APR at present. The reported 3.3% is instead composed of 3.2%, making trading volume the key variable.
The pool already shows 0.1% in reward APR, so there is no current reward stream to remove from the stated 3.3%. If fee volume weakens, however, the fee-derived portion 3.2% would decline without emissions replacing it.
The pool already shows 0.1% in reward APR, so there is no current reward stream to remove from the stated 3.3%. If fee volume weakens, however, the fee-derived portion 3.2% would decline without emissions replacing it.
Risk is high relative to a SOL-stablecoin pool because ALCH can move sharply, external liquidity may be thinner, and memecoin interest can exit quickly. Fees of 3.2% may offset some losses, but they do not eliminate price divergence or execution risk.
Risk is high relative to a SOL-stablecoin pool because ALCH can move sharply, external liquidity may be thinner, and memecoin interest can exit quickly. Fees of 3.2% may offset some losses, but they do not eliminate price divergence or execution risk.
Use a predefined exit rule based on a material TVL decline, weakening swap volume, or price leaving your selected SOL/ALCH range. For this pool, a sustained loss of fee support for 3.3% is a clearer exit signal than the absence of rewards, since reward APR is 0.1%.
Use a predefined exit rule based on a material TVL decline, weakening swap volume, or price leaving your selected SOL/ALCH range. For this pool, a sustained loss of fee support for 3.3% is a clearer exit signal than the absence of rewards, since reward APR is 0.1%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future SOL-ALCH price paths are unknown. At unchanged conditions, gross fee accrual is represented by 3.2%, but actual break-even depends on the size and persistence of divergence loss.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future SOL-ALCH price paths are unknown. At unchanged conditions, gross fee accrual is represented by 3.2%, but actual break-even depends on the size and persistence of divergence loss.
