Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 57% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, Exit at 60/100, and a live verdict of AVOID driven by ai_engine=hold. That combination indicates a pool assessed as suitable for continued observation rather than a strong new-entry signal: it ranks #1245 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, while its 0.07x turnover ratio and fee-only economics provide limited evidence of accelerating activity. The assessment would worsen with a material TVL drain, lower trading volume, or a collapse in fee APR, and could improve if sustained volume raised fee income without a comparable increase in liquidity.
Computed 2026-10-26 17:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$2.85M
Total value locked
$212.52K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up6.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position: review the SOL/ALCH price after a 10% relative move and rebalance or exit if the position becomes predominantly one token. Also reassess the position if TVL falls by 20% or the volume-to-TVL ratio drops below 0.02x, since fee income would then have less activity supporting it.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 6.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 6.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $212.52K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $531.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-ALCH pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4100 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8441 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ALCH liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALCH into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and ALCH you own can change as their prices move, and the pool’s current reward contribution is zero.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted APR consists of 6.4% from trading fees and 0.2% from rewards, with 97% of yield coming from fees. No current reward contribution is reflected in the APR, and the available data does not establish a reward-expiry schedule. At 0.07x volume-to-TVL, fee generation depends on trading activity remaining sufficient relative to deposited liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
A comparable seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range percentage are not available, so recent divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ALCH carries high sensitivity to abrupt sentiment shifts, thin or fragmented ALCH liquidity, and emission decay or incentive changes if rewards are introduced later. Exit timing matters because reduced trading activity can lower fee income while price divergence continues to affect the inventory.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network’s primary asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than ALCH, which generally makes SOL the more liquid side of this pair. For this LP, a sharp SOL move relative to ALCH changes the pool’s asset mix and can create impermanent loss versus simply holding the two tokens. SOL strength can therefore increase the amount of ALCH held by the position after rebalancing, while SOL weakness can produce the opposite effect.
tollALCH Context
ALCH is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more concentrated than SOL’s across the wider Solana market. A rapid ALCH repricing can move the position toward one asset and make execution costs more important when withdrawing or rebalancing. The LP’s outcome depends not only on fees but also on whether ALCH trading remains active enough to support the pool’s current fee income.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALCH into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and ALCH you own can change as their prices move, and the pool’s current reward contribution is zero.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FyDF3vKQFbcvNTsBi7L7LremrFPmXKbQqgAgnPg1hXXd
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ALCH (HNg5PYJm…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 6.6%, made up of 6.4% in fees and 0.2% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently zero, further emission decay would not reduce the displayed reward contribution, but any future incentives could decline over time.
The current APR is 6.6%, made up of 6.4% in fees and 0.2% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently zero, further emission decay would not reduce the displayed reward contribution, but any future incentives could decline over time.
The pool currently reports 0.2% from rewards, so expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the quoted APR. Fee income would remain the relevant source of yield at 6.4%, subject to trading volume and liquidity.
The pool currently reports 0.2% from rewards, so expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the quoted APR. Fee income would remain the relevant source of yield at 6.4%, subject to trading volume and liquidity.
Risk is substantial because ALCH may have less dispersed liquidity and can move sharply relative to SOL. The position also has no measured seven-day impermanent-loss or range-utilization history in the supplied data, so recent market behavior cannot be used to reduce that uncertainty.
Risk is substantial because ALCH may have less dispersed liquidity and can move sharply relative to SOL. The position also has no measured seven-day impermanent-loss or range-utilization history in the supplied data, so recent market behavior cannot be used to reduce that uncertainty.
Consider exiting if TVL falls materially, trading activity weakens, or the SOL/ALCH price moves 10% or more relative to the level at which you entered and the position becomes concentrated in one token. For this pool, a volume-to-TVL decline below 0.02x would be a concrete signal to reassess fee sustainability.
Consider exiting if TVL falls materially, trading activity weakens, or the SOL/ALCH price moves 10% or more relative to the level at which you entered and the position becomes concentrated in one token. For this pool, a volume-to-TVL decline below 0.02x would be a concrete signal to reassess fee sustainability.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and the pool’s future volume is uncertain. At 6.4% fee APR, fees would need to accumulate for the period required to offset the specific price divergence experienced by the position; a static APR does not guarantee recovery.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and the pool’s future volume is uncertain. At 6.4% fee APR, fees would need to accumulate for the period required to offset the specific price divergence experienced by the position; a static APR does not guarantee recovery.
