WealthVille
SOL
S
LLM
L

SOL-LLMon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $113.59K
APR
0.1% APR
24h Volume
$74.70 24h vol
Pool address
G6XZu9m41KxJ · observed 2026-09-16
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The 17/100 Wealthville Score places this pool below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and below the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. Its #1380-of-8541 rank among raydium-amm pools is consistent with the stated high risk and weak yield, despite fee-only sustainability. The assessment would improve if volume and TVL became more durable, APR rose through organic fees rather than temporary emissions, and the risk score declined; a TVL drain, lower volume, or yield collapse would worsen it.

Computed 2026-09-16 05:00 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$113.59K

Total value locked

$74.70

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

-0.2%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 356m agoTVL 3.8%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 92/100
tips_and_updates

Set a precommitted exit trigger for sustained TVL below $114K or total APR below 0.1%, and remove liquidity rather than widening the range after LLM loses momentum. Because tick-in-range history is unavailable, use a conservative range and review it after material SOL or LLM price movement.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.1%
Fee APR0.1%
Volume$74.70
Fees Earned$0.19

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.7%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.9%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-0.2%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 6 SOL-LLM pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#3494 of 67260 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 7% of all Solana pools

overall rank #7824 of 116409

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LLM liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LLM into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less value than simply holding both assets.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The quoted yield decomposes into 0.1% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, for 0.1% total APR. 100% means the current yield is entirely fee-funded, while reward dependency remains unclear; there is no confirmed schedule for any future incentive change. With $75 in 24-hour volume, fee generation is dependent on trading remaining active rather than on emissions.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are not reported, so recent divergence and range efficiency cannot be verified. The pool carries a 92/100 risk score and belongs to the MEMECOIN family, where emission decay, sharp price moves, and thin exit liquidity can reduce returns quickly. Exit timing matters because a fall in LLM demand can impair both the token price and the fees available to LPs.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. SOL price movement relative to LLM creates the main source of impermanent loss; a strong SOL move can leave an LP with greater exposure to the weaker asset after rebalancing.

tollLLM Context

LLM is the speculative memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on short-lived trading interest. A decline in LLM demand can reduce pool volume, worsen exit execution, and leave LPs holding more LLM while fees remain limited.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LLM into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less value than simply holding both assets.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

LLM
LLMLarge Language ModelSolana
Explorer

Large Language Model (LLM) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
G6XZu9m4yAmoW1uGFKcAHUW5ufpURBk4kCeWr9dP1KxJ
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
LLM (98mb39tP…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Emission decay would reduce any reward component represented by 0.0% over time, leaving fee income of 0.1% as the relevant source. Because reward dependency and its schedule are unclear, the future effect cannot be quantified from the available pool data.

Emission decay would reduce any reward component represented by 0.0% over time, leaving fee income of 0.1% as the relevant source. Because reward dependency and its schedule are unclear, the future effect cannot be quantified from the available pool data.

If incentives expire, the pool would depend on trading fees rather than 0.0% rewards, with 0.1% as the fee-only reference. At $75 volume and a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio, fee income could remain limited.

If incentives expire, the pool would depend on trading fees rather than 0.0% rewards, with 0.1% as the fee-only reference. At $75 volume and a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio, fee income could remain limited.

This pool has a 92/100 risk score and a MEMECOIN classification, so it combines SOL-versus-LLM impermanent-loss risk with potentially thin LLM liquidity. The reported 0.1% APR does not compensate automatically for a sharp token decline or difficult exit.

This pool has a 92/100 risk score and a MEMECOIN classification, so it combines SOL-versus-LLM impermanent-loss risk with potentially thin LLM liquidity. The reported 0.1% APR does not compensate automatically for a sharp token decline or difficult exit.

For SOL-LLM, predefine an exit when TVL remains below $114K, volume weakens from $75, or total APR falls below 0.1%. Also exit when LLM demand deteriorates enough that the position is increasingly concentrated in LLM and trading fees no longer justify the risk.

For SOL-LLM, predefine an exit when TVL remains below $114K, volume weakens from $75, or total APR falls below 0.1%. Also exit when LLM demand deteriorates enough that the position is increasingly concentrated in LLM and trading fees no longer justify the risk.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Recovery depends on future fee accrual at 0.1%, price divergence between SOL and LLM, and whether trading volume remains sufficient.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Recovery depends on future fee accrual at 0.1%, price divergence between SOL and LLM, and whether trading volume remains sufficient.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights