new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 places SOL-CYBERLEEK near the middle of the measured pool set, while Enter 44/100 / Hold 55/100 / Exit 26/100 produces the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver implies existing exposure is not being flagged for immediate exit, but the score does not establish that new capital is preferable to alternatives. Its rank of #1313 of 18146 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively stronger position than most listed pools, while still leaving substantial room for deterioration. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee yield, or worsening swap activity would change the assessment toward exit; durable fee generation with stable liquidity would support the hold view.
Computed 2026-10-09 16:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$715.46K
Total value locked
$893.18K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up223.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -48.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: withdraw if pool TVL falls materially from $715K or if fee accrual no longer supports 117.7% after a sustained volume slowdown; do not widen the range merely to avoid managing an out-of-range position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 223.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 117.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $893.18K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.23K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 10 SOL-CYBERLEEK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#979 of 80377 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1834 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CYBERLEEK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CYBERLEEK into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the pool can return a different mix of the two assets, and their prices can move sharply because CYBERLEEK is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Reported yield decomposes into 117.7% from trading fees and 106.1% from rewards, with 53% of yield attributed to trading fees. Reward dependency and any future emission schedule are not established, so the current APR should not be projected as a permanent rate. If emissions are introduced later, their decay and expiration would reduce the reward component without necessarily changing fee generation.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is not reported, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized divergence risk cannot be quantified from these fields. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-CYBERLEEK carries elevated risk from sharp price moves, shallow exit liquidity relative to larger Solana markets, and adverse selection when one side moves rapidly. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because reported yield is fee-led, but exit timing still matters if trading activity or liquidity deteriorates.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than CYBERLEEK. SOL price movement changes the relative value of the two deposits; a strong move in SOL versus CYBERLEEK can increase rebalancing and impermanent-loss exposure for the LP. The pair's pool-level liquidity should not be treated as equivalent to SOL's broader market depth.
tollCYBERLEEK Context
CYBERLEEK is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and liquidity are likely more concentrated than SOL's. A rapid CYBERLEEK rally or decline can cause the pool to hold a less favorable asset mix as arbitrageurs rebalance it. Its volatility is therefore a primary driver of LP risk even when fee volume remains elevated.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CYBERLEEK into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the pool can return a different mix of the two assets, and their prices can move sharply because CYBERLEEK is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- G8kgi7aUpeX8EVR8VMkrth9SKEv5BietWC33UjAiiMGh
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CYBERLEEK (ApZuxdpz…)
- Created
- 8/17/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
20%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
29%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 106.1%, so reported yield is currently driven by 117.7% in trading fees. If emissions are added or become relevant, decay would lower the reward portion while leaving fee income dependent on actual volume.
The current reward component is 106.1%, so reported yield is currently driven by 117.7% in trading fees. If emissions are added or become relevant, decay would lower the reward portion while leaving fee income dependent on actual volume.
Expired incentives would remove or reduce the reward component, but the pool's stated fee income remains 117.7% and 53% identifies trading fees as the yield source. With no reward dependency established, the key post-expiry variable is whether trading volume supports the fee rate.
Expired incentives would remove or reduce the reward component, but the pool's stated fee income remains 117.7% and 53% identifies trading fees as the yield source. With no reward dependency established, the key post-expiry variable is whether trading volume supports the fee rate.
Risk is material because CYBERLEEK can move sharply against SOL, while pool liquidity is $715K and recent range and IL readings are unavailable. The pool's 1.25x turnover provides fee activity, but it does not remove price divergence, execution, or exit-liquidity risk.
Risk is material because CYBERLEEK can move sharply against SOL, while pool liquidity is $715K and recent range and IL readings are unavailable. The pool's 1.25x turnover provides fee activity, but it does not remove price divergence, execution, or exit-liquidity risk.
For this pool, use a sustained drop in TVL below $715K or a breakdown in fee generation from 117.7% as review triggers, especially if CYBERLEEK volatility accelerates. Exit timing should also account for whether the position has become heavily concentrated in one token after a large price move.
For this pool, use a sustained drop in TVL below $715K or a breakdown in fee generation from 117.7% as review triggers, especially if CYBERLEEK volatility accelerates. Exit timing should also account for whether the position has become heavily concentrated in one token after a large price move.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent IL and range history are unavailable. Compare realized fee accrual at 117.7% with the actual change in your withdrawn asset mix and prices; the headline 223.7% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent IL and range history are unavailable. Compare realized fee accrual at 117.7% with the actual change in your withdrawn asset mix and prices; the headline 223.7% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
