new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 gives this pool a middle-of-the-scale assessment: Enter is 39/100, Hold is 52/100, and Exit is 28/100. The live verdict is HOLD, with the stated driver ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #43 of 889 meteora-damm-v2 pools. That ranking indicates a relatively stronger position within this protocol set, not low absolute risk; the assessment would weaken if $168K drained, $2K fell, fee APR collapsed, or AVO/SOL volatility increased enough to impair range management.
Computed 2026-09-11 21:48 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$168.29K
Total value locked
$2.00K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up10.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 3.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined range and rebalance or exit if AVO/SOL moves outside that range, if 0.01x declines materially, or if fee generation no longer justifies the memecoin inventory risk; do not treat 10.9% as a fixed return.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 10.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 10.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.00K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $32.62 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 AVO-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#348 of 1936 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6364 of 113637
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the AVO-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing AVO and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the weaker token and be worth less than simply holding both if AVO and SOL move sharply apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 10.3% from trading fees and 0.6% from rewards, with 95% of yield attributed to trading fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not the present source of APR; future fee yield depends on $2K volume relative to $168K liquidity and can fall if trading activity or liquidity conditions change.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and in-range readings are not reported, so the available data does not establish how efficiently this position has tracked its price range. As a MEMECOIN pool, AVO-SOL carries substantial token-specific volatility and asymmetric exit risk: a sharp AVO move against SOL can create impermanent loss, while a drop in liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly. Emission decay is a family-level concern for memecoin pools, although this pool currently reports no reward APR; exit timing should therefore account for fee-volume deterioration as well as price divergence.
tollAVO Context
AVO is the memecoin side of this pool and is paired against SOL for concentrated liquidity. The supplied metrics do not establish AVO's liquidity depth elsewhere, so external-market execution and price discovery should not be assumed to match this pool. AVO appreciation or depreciation relative to SOL changes the inventory mix and can produce impermanent loss even when fee income is positive.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the reference asset against which AVO's relative price movement is measured in this position. The supplied data does not quantify SOL liquidity elsewhere, but SOL's broader market movement can drive AVO/SOL volatility and alter the pool's inventory composition. A sustained AVO decline versus SOL is particularly relevant because the LP can end up holding more AVO as its market value falls.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing AVO and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the weaker token and be worth less than simply holding both if AVO and SOL move sharply apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GGZ2n9MNaPSZsXVYwc9Ka2oneRQeP6MELSPeqoLpjA9m
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- AVO (GdZ9rwHy…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
500%
APR
1%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
This pool currently shows 10.3% in fee APR and 0.6% in reward APR, so the displayed 10.9% is not currently reliant on reward emissions. If incentives are introduced or reduced later, emission decay could lower the reward component while fee income would still depend on $2K and $168K.
This pool currently shows 10.3% in fee APR and 0.6% in reward APR, so the displayed 10.9% is not currently reliant on reward emissions. If incentives are introduced or reduced later, emission decay could lower the reward component while fee income would still depend on $2K and $168K.
The current reward component is already 0.6%, while 95% of the stated yield comes from trading fees. If incentives expire or remain absent, LP income would be determined mainly by fee volume, and 10.9% could fall if trading activity does not compensate.
The current reward component is already 0.6%, while 95% of the stated yield comes from trading fees. If incentives expire or remain absent, LP income would be determined mainly by fee volume, and 10.9% could fall if trading activity does not compensate.
Risk is materially driven by AVO's price volatility, its relative movement against SOL, and the ability to exit without severe slippage. The pool has $168K liquidity and 0.01x volume-to-liquidity turnover, but the absence of recent IL and range-history readings limits confidence in estimating realized LP risk.
Risk is materially driven by AVO's price volatility, its relative movement against SOL, and the ability to exit without severe slippage. The pool has $168K liquidity and 0.01x volume-to-liquidity turnover, but the absence of recent IL and range-history readings limits confidence in estimating realized LP risk.
For AVO-SOL, consider exiting when AVO/SOL leaves your chosen range, when 0.01x or $2K deteriorates enough to reduce fee compensation, or when the AVO thesis no longer supports holding the resulting inventory. A falling $168K is an additional warning because it can worsen execution and reduce fee generation.
For AVO-SOL, consider exiting when AVO/SOL leaves your chosen range, when 0.01x or $2K deteriorates enough to reduce fee compensation, or when the AVO thesis no longer supports holding the resulting inventory. A falling $168K is an additional warning because it can worsen execution and reduce fee generation.
There is no reliable break-even estimate from the supplied data because recent IL history and range exposure are not reported, and 10.9% is variable rather than guaranteed. Fee recovery would depend on sustaining 10.3% through continued $2K volume, while the realized result would also depend on how far AVO and SOL diverge.
There is no reliable break-even estimate from the supplied data because recent IL history and range exposure are not reported, and 10.9% is variable rather than guaranteed. Fee recovery would depend on sustaining 10.3% through continued $2K volume, while the realized result would also depend on how far AVO and SOL diverge.
