new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 48/100 places this pool below the stated Enter score of 41/100 and Hold score of 56/100, while the Exit score is 24/100. The live verdict is HOLD, consistent with a high risk score of 56/100, weak yield, and limited recent turnover. Its rank of #375 among 1834 meteora-damm-v2 pools makes it a middling-to-lower-ranked option rather than a clear peer leader. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased fee generation without a comparable TVL drain; it would worsen with a TVL decline, weaker fee yield, lower activity, or the onset of reward dependence after emissions decay.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$103.63K
Total value locked
$2.56K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up11.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -67.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a monitored range and set an exit trigger before entry: close or rebalance if the AVO-SOL price leaves the selected range, or if 24-hour volume falls materially below $3K while the pool's 0.02x turnover remains weak. Do not wait for emissions to justify staying, because the current reward component is zero.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 11.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 11.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.56K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $41.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 AVO-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#406 of 2467 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6897 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the AVO-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing AVO and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price move between AVO and SOL can change what assets you hold and reduce your result compared with simply holding them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed Total APR of 11.9% consists of 11.2% from trading fees and 0.7% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 95%, so current yield does not depend on active reward emissions. Reward duration is not established, and the reward component is currently zero; any future emissions would be subject to decay and could change the APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not reported, so recent loss history and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. A MEMECOIN pool adds substantial token-specific price and liquidity risk, while concentrated liquidity can leave an LP holding more AVO or SOL after a directional move. Emission decay and exit timing matter even though current reward APR is zero: an LP should not assume future incentives will offset adverse price movement or weak fee volume.
tollAVO Context
AVO is the memecoin side of this pair and is the primary source of token-specific price and liquidity risk. Liquidity depth for AVO elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics, so an AVO price move can create execution risk in addition to impermanent loss. A sharp AVO move relative to SOL changes the LP's inventory mix and may leave the position concentrated in the weaker-performing asset.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired with AVO and generally determines the reference side of the pair's price movement. SOL liquidity elsewhere is not quantified here, so this sheet does not establish how easily an LP could rebalance outside the pool. SOL appreciation or depreciation relative to AVO changes the position's inventory mix and can make a concentrated range leave the pool into one asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing AVO and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price move between AVO and SOL can change what assets you hold and reduce your result compared with simply holding them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GGZ2n9MNaPSZsXVYwc9Ka2oneRQeP6MELSPeqoLpjA9m
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- AVO (GdZ9rwHy…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
4%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 11.9%, made up of 11.2% in fees and 0.7% in rewards, so emission decay does not currently reduce the displayed reward component below its present level. If incentives are added later, decay could lower that portion while fee yield would still depend on trading volume.
The current APR is 11.9%, made up of 11.2% in fees and 0.7% in rewards, so emission decay does not currently reduce the displayed reward component below its present level. If incentives are added later, decay could lower that portion while fee yield would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.7%, so expiration would not remove a currently recorded reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 11.2% in trading fees, which are supported by 95% and can weaken if activity falls.
The current reward component is 0.7%, so expiration would not remove a currently recorded reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 11.2% in trading fees, which are supported by 95% and can weaken if activity falls.
The pool carries a risk score of 56/100 and combines memecoin price risk with concentrated-liquidity inventory changes. AVO's price can move sharply relative to SOL, while the pool's $104K TVL and 0.02x turnover provide limited evidence of deep trading activity.
The pool carries a risk score of 56/100 and combines memecoin price risk with concentrated-liquidity inventory changes. AVO's price can move sharply relative to SOL, while the pool's $104K TVL and 0.02x turnover provide limited evidence of deep trading activity.
Set the exit rule before entering: leave or rebalance when price exits your chosen range, when AVO liquidity becomes difficult to trade, or when activity falls materially below $3K and fees no longer justify the exposure. Do not use unconfirmed future emissions as the reason to delay an exit.
Set the exit rule before entering: leave or rebalance when price exits your chosen range, when AVO liquidity becomes difficult to trade, or when activity falls materially below $3K and fees no longer justify the exposure. Do not use unconfirmed future emissions as the reason to delay an exit.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future price divergence is unknown. In a simplified case with no price change, fee recovery would depend on 11.2%; actual break-even also depends on range management, volume, and AVO-SOL price movement.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future price divergence is unknown. In a simplified case with no price change, fee recovery would depend on 11.2%; actual break-even also depends on range management, volume, and AVO-SOL price movement.
