USDT-FOon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $166.15K
- APR
- 3.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $72.28K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.02% fee
- Pool address
- GGZtqoqs…AMgi · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 places this pool in a middling position, with Enter at 44/100, Hold at 56/100, and Exit at 25/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #410 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools makes it neither a top-ranked opportunity nor an automatic exit, which is consistent with fee-funded yield but limited liquidity and material memecoin exposure. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume stopped supporting 3.5%, total APR collapsed, or sustained FO price movement caused persistent out-of-range exposure; stronger liquidity and durable fee volume would improve it.
Computed 2026-08-23 03:56 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$166.15K
Total value locked
$72.28K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 7.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range around the current USDT/FO price rather than treating the position as passive. Rebalance when spot reaches roughly 80% of the distance to either boundary, and exit if FO volume or pool liquidity falls enough that fee income no longer compensates for the effort and inventory risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $72.28K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $14.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USDT-FO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#380 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2174 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDT-FO liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDT and FO into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large FO price move can leave you with a less favorable mix of USDT and FO than simply holding the assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 3.5% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. 98% of the yield is fee-funded, while reward dependency is not established; the current reward component does not provide a meaningful emissions cushion. For this MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as temporary and subject to decay, so exit timing should not assume that the displayed APR persists after incentives change.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss figure is not reported, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, FO can experience sharp price moves, which can push a concentrated-liquidity position out of range or leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset. Emission decay is an additional timing risk if incentives are introduced later; reassess before remaining for fee yield alone when volume or liquidity weakens.
tollUSDT Context
USDT is the stable-dollar side of the pair and generally has substantial liquidity elsewhere on Solana, making it the less volatile inventory component. In this pool, USDT provides the quote asset for FO trades; FO price movement changes the LP's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when the USDT balance itself remains stable.
tollFO Context
FO is the memecoin side, and its broader liquidity, market depth, and price behavior should be evaluated separately from this pool's figures. A sharp FO move can consume the pool's active price range and leave the LP concentrated in FO after selling USDT into the move, while a reversal can produce the opposite inventory shift.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDT and FO into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large FO price move can leave you with a less favorable mix of USDT and FO than simply holding the assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GGZtqoqscbx81ycwGJ8KQEKWuN9BKLhyXPf6VSiRAMgi
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- USDT (Es9vMFrz…)
- Token B
- FO (JDzPbXbo…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, while total APR is 3.5% and fee-funded yield is 3.5%. Because the stated yield is fee-based and reward dependency is not established, future emissions should not be assumed to support APR if incentives are later added and decay.
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, while total APR is 3.5% and fee-funded yield is 3.5%. Because the stated yield is fee-based and reward dependency is not established, future emissions should not be assumed to support APR if incentives are later added and decay.
The reward portion would fall away, leaving trading fees as the remaining source of LP income. For this pool, that means the relevant ongoing figure would be 3.5%, while 0.1% is the current reward-only component; actual realized yield would still depend on volume and liquidity.
The reward portion would fall away, leaving trading fees as the remaining source of LP income. For this pool, that means the relevant ongoing figure would be 3.5%, while 0.1% is the current reward-only component; actual realized yield would still depend on volume and liquidity.
The main risk is FO price movement: it can push a concentrated position out of range and change the LP's inventory toward FO during a decline. The pool has $166K in liquidity and $72K in recent volume, with a 0.44x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but no recent impermanent-loss or range-utilization history is reported.
The main risk is FO price movement: it can push a concentrated position out of range and change the LP's inventory toward FO during a decline. The pool has $166K in liquidity and $72K in recent volume, with a 0.44x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but no recent impermanent-loss or range-utilization history is reported.
Consider exiting when FO approaches or breaks the active range, when pool liquidity or volume declines enough to reduce fee generation, or when the position becomes mostly FO after a sustained decline. A collapse in 3.5% or 0.44x would be a clearer exit signal than the headline 3.5% alone.
Consider exiting when FO approaches or breaks the active range, when pool liquidity or volume declines enough to reduce fee generation, or when the position becomes mostly FO after a sustained decline. A collapse in 3.5% or 0.44x would be a clearer exit signal than the headline 3.5% alone.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income varies with trading activity. The theoretical comparison should use 3.5% in fees against the size of the unmeasured loss, while 0.1% does not currently provide a material offset.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income varies with trading activity. The theoretical comparison should use 3.5% in fees against the size of the unmeasured loss, while 0.1% does not currently provide a material offset.
