WealthVille
USDT
U
FO
F

USDT-FOon Raydium CLMMCLMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $153.97K
Fee tier
0.02% fee
Pool address
GGZtqoqs…AMgi · observed 2026-10-07
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the system sees the pool as a position to maintain rather than an immediate entry or exit, consistent with its #873 of 4410 ranking among raydium-clmm pools. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened enough to reduce 0.0%, fee sustainability deteriorated, or FO volatility produced sustained out-of-range exposure and measurable IL.

Computed 2026-08-28 05:59 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$153.97K

Total value locked

$0.00

24h volume

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 0.0%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.02% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 6083m ago0
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

tips_and_updates

Enter with a concentrated range centered on the current FO-USDT price, and rebalance when price reaches the outer 10% of the range; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if 24-hour volume falls below the level implied by 0.00x or if fee-only APR drops materially below 0.0%.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.0%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
0.0%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 USDT-FO pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#2204 of 18470 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDT-FO liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing USDT and FO into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large FO price move can leave you holding a different mix of USDT and FO and can reduce your result compared with simply holding the tokens.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The reported yield decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 0%, so the current return depends on continued swap volume rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available; fee APR can decline if FO trading activity or liquidity conditions weaken.

shieldRisk Assessment

A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so recent IL cannot be quantified for this position. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving range utilization and the frequency of out-of-range exposure unresolved. As a MEMECOIN pool, FO price shocks, rapid volume decay, and emission decay are central risks; exit timing matters because fee income can fall quickly after speculative activity fades.

tollUSDT Context

USDT is the stable-value side of the pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than FO. If FO appreciates or falls sharply, the position's inventory shifts away from the original USDT-FO balance, while USDT price deviations or stablecoin liquidity stress would affect the supposedly stable side of the LP.

tollFO Context

FO is the volatile memecoin side and is the main source of directional price and inventory risk in this pool. Its liquidity depth outside this pool should be assessed separately; $154K in USDT-FO does not establish that FO can be exited efficiently elsewhere. Large FO moves can create impermanent loss even when fee volume is high.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing USDT and FO into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large FO price move can leave you holding a different mix of USDT and FO and can reduce your result compared with simply holding the tokens.

token

Token Details

USDT
USDTSolana

Tether (USDT) is a stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the US dollar, the most traded asset in crypto markets.

FO
FOOfficial FOSolana
Explorer

Official FO (FO) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
GGZtqoqscbx81ycwGJ8KQEKWuN9BKLhyXPf6VSiRAMgi
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
USDT (Es9vMFrz…)
Token B
FO (JDzPbXbo…)
Created
4/20/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current return is reported as 0.0%, split between 0.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because fee sustainability is 0%, emission decay should have limited direct effect while the reward component remains at 0.0%, but any future reward allocation could decline as emissions decay.

The current return is reported as 0.0%, split between 0.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because fee sustainability is 0%, emission decay should have limited direct effect while the reward component remains at 0.0%, but any future reward allocation could decline as emissions decay.

The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving the fee component of 0.0% as the primary return source. Since the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, the immediate reported APR may already be largely or entirely dependent on trading fees; future fee income still depends on volume.

The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving the fee component of 0.0% as the primary return source. Since the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, the immediate reported APR may already be largely or entirely dependent on trading fees; future fee income still depends on volume.

Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because FO can move sharply, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while the position is active. The pool has $154K TVL and $0 in 24-hour volume, but recent IL and range-use history are not available, so the loss and execution profile cannot be fully quantified.

Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because FO can move sharply, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while the position is active. The pool has $154K TVL and $0 in 24-hour volume, but recent IL and range-use history are not available, so the loss and execution profile cannot be fully quantified.

Consider exiting when FO's price leaves the selected range, when volume falls enough that 0.0% no longer compensates for active management and price risk, or when TVL declines materially from $154K. In a memecoin pool, exit timing should precede the loss of speculative volume rather than wait for emissions to decay completely.

Consider exiting when FO's price leaves the selected range, when volume falls enough that 0.0% no longer compensates for active management and price risk, or when TVL declines materially from $154K. In a memecoin pool, exit timing should precede the loss of speculative volume rather than wait for emissions to decay completely.

It cannot be calculated from the available data because a seven-day IL measure and range history are unavailable. Break-even depends on the actual FO price path, time in range, and realized fee income; 0.0% is the relevant starting point, not 0.0% if any reward component changes.

It cannot be calculated from the available data because a seven-day IL measure and range history are unavailable. Break-even depends on the actual FO price path, time in range, and realized fee income; 0.0% is the relevant starting point, not 0.0% if any reward component changes.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights