Jotchua-BUCKINGHAMon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $28.28K
- APR
- 14.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $262.18 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- GK4f3dvZ…YtcB · observed 2026-10-26
Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 8/100 assigns Enter 10/100, Hold 6/100, and Exit 95/100, with the live verdict EXIT. That assessment reflects the stated ai_engine=hold signal being outweighed by high risk at 94/100 and weak yield quality despite 94% fee sustainability. At rank #1795 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, the pool is not being treated as a leading venue by the ranking. A sustained increase in TVL and volume, lower measured risk, or stronger fee generation could improve the assessment; a TVL drain, volume decline, or fee-yield collapse would worsen it.
Computed 2026-10-23 05:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$28.28K
Total value locked
$262.18
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up14.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range around the current JOTCHUA-BUCKINGHAM price, rebalance only after price leaves that range, and set an exit trigger if pool TVL falls materially below $28K or fee activity no longer supports 13.2%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 14.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 13.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $262.18 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.94 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 Jotchua-BUCKINGHAM pools
by AI Farmer Score
#820 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6897 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the Jotchua-BUCKINGHAM liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing JOTCHUA and BUCKINGHAM into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but large price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and this pool's reward component is currently absent.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 13.2% fee APR and 0.9% reward APR, making 94% of the total APR fee-derived. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no current reward component to cushion a decline in trading activity. The yield therefore depends on fees continuing to accrue against the pool's limited volume rather than on a disclosed emissions schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so recent price-divergence damage cannot be quantified from the supplied data. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving range exposure and the frequency of out-of-range capital unmeasured. As a MEMECOIN pool, JOTCHUA and BUCKINGHAM can experience abrupt, asymmetric price moves; emission conditions and lifecycle are unclear, so exit timing should account for possible incentive decay and rapid loss of trading relevance.
tollJotchua Context
JOTCHUA is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, so providing liquidity requires exposure to its price relative to BUCKINGHAM. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp JOTCHUA move can leave the position concentrated in one asset and increase impermanent-loss risk.
tollBUCKINGHAM Context
BUCKINGHAM is the other side of the pair and determines the exchange rate at which the position earns fees. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so thin external markets or abrupt BUCKINGHAM price changes could increase slippage, range exits, and the divergence between fee income and token-price losses.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing JOTCHUA and BUCKINGHAM into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but large price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and this pool's reward component is currently absent.
Token Details
BUCKINGHAM is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GK4f3dvZnjCFzp3LZvpBD1vNn9t91yfmf8q8bdLMYtcB
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- Jotchua (BcHEaaTC…)
- Token B
- BUCKINGHAM (FcrChwb4…)
- Created
- 7/5/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.9%, so disclosed emissions do not currently contribute to the 14.1% total APR. Any future emission reduction would matter only if rewards are introduced; fee income remains tied to trading activity and 13.2%.
The current reward component is 0.9%, so disclosed emissions do not currently contribute to the 14.1% total APR. Any future emission reduction would matter only if rewards are introduced; fee income remains tied to trading activity and 13.2%.
Because the current reward component is 0.9%, an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream from the stated APR. The remaining yield would be fee-derived at 13.2%, subject to changes in the pool's trading volume.
Because the current reward component is 0.9%, an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream from the stated APR. The remaining yield would be fee-derived at 13.2%, subject to changes in the pool's trading volume.
The pool carries a risk score of 94/100, and its small $28K base and 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio leave fee production dependent on limited activity. Memecoin price shocks can also push the position out of range or create impermanent loss that cannot be offset by the current 0.9% reward component.
The pool carries a risk score of 94/100, and its small $28K base and 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio leave fee production dependent on limited activity. Memecoin price shocks can also push the position out of range or create impermanent loss that cannot be offset by the current 0.9% reward component.
For this pool, consider exiting when TVL or trading activity deteriorates materially from $28K and $262, when price leaves the monitored range without a clear rebalancing case, or when the fee-derived return of 13.2% no longer compensates for the exposure. The live verdict EXIT and low Enter score of 10/100 support treating these as defined exit conditions rather than waiting for incentives.
For this pool, consider exiting when TVL or trading activity deteriorates materially from $28K and $262, when price leaves the monitored range without a clear rebalancing case, or when the fee-derived return of 13.2% no longer compensates for the exposure. The live verdict EXIT and low Enter score of 10/100 support treating these as defined exit conditions rather than waiting for incentives.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Even with fee-only APR of 13.2%, fees accumulate only if volume persists at a level consistent with $262; token-price moves can extend or prevent break-even.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Even with fee-only APR of 13.2%, fees accumulate only if volume persists at a level consistent with $262; token-price moves can extend or prevent break-even.
