new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates a monitoring stance rather than a strong entry signal, consistent with a pool ranked #1108 of 8541 raydium-amm pools and supported by fees but limited trading activity. The assessment would worsen if TVL drains, volume falls below $172 for a sustained period, or 0.1% declines materially; it could improve if durable volume growth raises fee income without a corresponding liquidity drain.
Computed 2026-10-22 23:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.23K
Total value locked
$172.20
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Do not use a narrow concentrated range until range-utilization data is available; instead, set a review trigger for any 20% decline in TVL from $67K or three consecutive days with volume below $172. Exit or reduce exposure if either trigger occurs, because fee income may no longer compensate for CAT execution and inventory risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $172.20 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.43 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 CAT-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3305 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6957 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CAT-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CAT and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and mix of CAT and SOL you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially if CAT moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the displayed APR is not currently dependent on reward emissions. Reward dependency is not established; if future incentives are introduced, emission decay and their expiration would reduce the reward component without changing the fee component.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, so recent divergence between CAT and SOL cannot be quantified from this sheet. Seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving concentrated-liquidity utilization and range-management needs unresolved. As a MEMECOIN pool, CAT can gap sharply, liquidity can disappear faster than in major-asset pools, and exit timing matters: emission decay is an additional risk if incentives are added later, while the current fee-only structure leaves no reward cushion if trading activity weakens.
tollCAT Context
CAT is the memecoin side of this pool, so CAT price changes determine much of the inventory divergence experienced by an LP. CAT liquidity depth elsewhere is not quantified here; thinner external liquidity would make CAT exits more price-sensitive, while a CAT rally generally leaves the LP with less CAT and a CAT decline leaves it with more CAT.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established, widely traded side of the pair and provides the reference asset against which CAT's price is measured. SOL liquidity elsewhere is not quantified in this sheet, but SOL price movement still affects the pool's value and the relative performance of holding the two assets separately versus supplying them here.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CAT and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and mix of CAT and SOL you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially if CAT moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GYKDfe5xuvAwvq5ECWC7cNCRkGU3Pjgb87pgWah5QmHZ
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- CAT (7hWcHohz…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the displayed return is currently fee-funded. If rewards are introduced and then decay, only the reward portion would fall; fee income would still depend on the pool's trading volume.
The current APR is split between 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the displayed return is currently fee-funded. If rewards are introduced and then decay, only the reward portion would fall; fee income would still depend on the pool's trading volume.
Because 0.0% is currently the reward component, an expired incentive would not remove the current fee component of 0.1%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees generated against $67K and $172, with no separate reward subsidy.
Because 0.0% is currently the reward component, an expired incentive would not remove the current fee component of 0.1%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees generated against $67K and $172, with no separate reward subsidy.
Risk is high relative to pools built from established assets because CAT can move abruptly and its external liquidity depth is not quantified here. With $67K in the pool and 0.00x turnover, LPs face both CAT price divergence and the possibility that low activity produces insufficient fees for the risk taken.
Risk is high relative to pools built from established assets because CAT can move abruptly and its external liquidity depth is not quantified here. With $67K in the pool and 0.00x turnover, LPs face both CAT price divergence and the possibility that low activity produces insufficient fees for the risk taken.
For CAT-SOL, review an exit if TVL falls 20% from $67K or volume remains below $172 for three consecutive days. A sharp CAT move, worsening execution outside the pool, or a material decline from 0.1% are additional reasons to reduce exposure rather than wait for incentives that are not currently contributing.
For CAT-SOL, review an exit if TVL falls 20% from $67K or volume remains below $172 for three consecutive days. A sharp CAT move, worsening execution outside the pool, or a material decline from 0.1% are additional reasons to reduce exposure rather than wait for incentives that are not currently contributing.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and CAT's future price path is unknown. At the current fee-only rate of 0.1%, fees would need to accumulate while trading activity remains stable and CAT-SOL price divergence stays small enough for fee income to offset the LP's relative performance loss.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and CAT's future price path is unknown. At the current fee-only rate of 0.1%, fees would need to accumulate while trading activity remains stable and CAT-SOL price divergence stays small enough for fee income to offset the LP's relative performance loss.
