new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 44/100, with Enter 39/100, Hold 50/100, and Exit 31/100; the live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold. That places this pool at rank #475 of 8541 raydium-amm pools: it is not being classified as an immediate exit, but the score does not establish that its fee rate will persist. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, fee APR collapses, or AVA liquidity deteriorates; it could improve if fee generation remains durable alongside stable or growing liquidity and better measurable range performance.
Computed 2026-09-07 21:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.21M
Total value locked
$444.92K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up40.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -5.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a predefined rebalance rule: review the position whenever the SOL/AVA price ratio moves 20% from the entry reference, and reduce or exit if volume falls materially while the pool's fee APR no longer compensates for the inventory shift. Do not set a narrow tick range without current tick-distribution data.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 40.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 33.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $444.92K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.11K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 6 SOL-AVA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1373 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3491 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AVA liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AVA into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amount of each token you hold changes as prices move, and a sharp AVA move can leave you with less favorable exposure than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR decomposes into 33.9% from swap fees and 6.4% from rewards. 84% of the stated yield is fee-derived, so current returns depend on continued trading volume rather than a reward schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and no current reward-duration estimate is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range data is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-AVA carries sharp repricing, liquidity withdrawal, and correlation-break risks in both assets. Emission decay is not currently represented in the reward APR, but any future incentives should be treated as temporary and exit timing should be based on declining volume, reduced fee generation, or deteriorating pool liquidity rather than headline APR.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established-chain asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a typical memecoin. SOL price moves change the pool's relative inventory and can create impermanent loss when AVA does not move in step. Its broader liquidity can support execution, but it does not remove the pair-specific risk.
tollAVA Context
AVA is the memecoin-side asset, so its external liquidity depth and price discovery should be verified rather than inferred from this pool alone. A sharp AVA move against SOL can cause the AMM to sell the appreciating asset and accumulate the depreciating one, while thin external liquidity can amplify exit slippage. AVA-specific volatility is therefore central to LP risk.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AVA into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amount of each token you hold changes as prices move, and a sharp AVA move can leave you with less favorable exposure than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GjvW8JQSpKG5ogjyD3zozfaeJSShTajS5ZFrexT8L12k
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AVA (DKu9kykS…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
369%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current rewards contribute 6.4% to the total APR, while fees contribute 33.9%. Because 84% of yield is fee-derived, emission decay is not the current source of APR decline; any future reward emissions would be temporary and should not be treated as durable yield.
Current rewards contribute 6.4% to the total APR, while fees contribute 33.9%. Because 84% of yield is fee-derived, emission decay is not the current source of APR decline; any future reward emissions would be temporary and should not be treated as durable yield.
The reward component would fall toward zero when incentives end, leaving fee income as the relevant return source. For SOL-AVA, that means the remaining APR would depend on trading volume and fee generation rather than a farm subsidy.
The reward component would fall toward zero when incentives end, leaving fee income as the relevant return source. For SOL-AVA, that means the remaining APR would depend on trading volume and fee generation rather than a farm subsidy.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because AVA can reprice sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool is exposed to impermanent loss without a quantified recent history. The position currently shows $1.2M TVL, $445K in 24h volume, and 0.37x volume relative to TVL, but those figures do not remove memecoin-specific exit risk.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because AVA can reprice sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool is exposed to impermanent loss without a quantified recent history. The position currently shows $1.2M TVL, $445K in 24h volume, and 0.37x volume relative to TVL, but those figures do not remove memecoin-specific exit risk.
Use a predefined trigger such as a 20% move in the SOL/AVA ratio, a material TVL drain, or a sustained decline in volume and fee APR. Exit timing should also account for AVA's external liquidity, because a pool can still display a high annualized fee rate while becoming harder to unwind.
Use a predefined trigger such as a 20% move in the SOL/AVA ratio, a material TVL drain, or a sustained decline in volume and fee APR. Exit timing should also account for AVA's external liquidity, because a pool can still display a high annualized fee rate while becoming harder to unwind.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. The theoretical comparison is between the position's accumulated 33.9% and the realized loss from SOL/AVA divergence, with no guarantee that fees will offset that loss.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. The theoretical comparison is between the position's accumulated 33.9% and the realized loss from SOL/AVA divergence, with no guarantee that fees will offset that loss.
