new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 places SOL-AVA near the lower portion of the rated raydium-amm universe despite its rank of #1473 of 24532 pools. Enter at 39/100, Hold at 52/100, and Exit at 28/100 indicate a live HOLD posture rather than a strong entry signal; the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume and fee APR collapsed, liquidity became materially more one-sided, or a durable increase in fee generation improved the pool's risk-adjusted profile.
Computed 2026-10-25 09:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.13M
Total value locked
$61.54K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a monitored price range and rebalance when the position reaches either range boundary; exit if 24-hour volume falls materially below $62K or TVL declines materially from $1.1M, because fee generation would then weaken while memecoin inventory risk remains.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $61.54K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $153.84 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 SOL-AVA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4534 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9222 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AVA liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AVA into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset and a lower result than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 4.7% consists of 4.6% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 98%, so the stated yield depends on trading activity rather than an active reward stream. The reward schedule and any remaining incentive duration are not established for this pool, making emission-based forward projections unreliable.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent measured impermanent-loss result and tick-in-range history are not provided in the snapshot, so current range efficiency and realized IL cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-AVA carries elevated relative-price and liquidity-gap risk: sharp AVA moves can leave the LP holding more of the underperforming asset. Emission decay is a relevant family risk if incentives are added later, and exit timing should be based on weakening volume, shrinking TVL, or a deteriorating fee stream rather than on an assumed reward schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the higher-liquidity asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool alone. SOL price moves change the pair's required inventory mix; a sustained SOL move against AVA can increase impermanent loss even when swap fees continue to accrue.
tollAVA Context
AVA is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery may be more concentrated outside this pair. A sharp AVA repricing can make the LP position increasingly one-sided and can also make exit execution more sensitive to pool depth and current trading volume.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AVA into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset and a lower result than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GjvW8JQSpKG5ogjyD3zozfaeJSShTajS5ZFrexT8L12k
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AVA (DKu9kykS…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, so the quoted 4.7% is presently driven by 4.6% in trading fees. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, that reward component would decline, while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, so the quoted 4.7% is presently driven by 4.6% in trading fees. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, that reward component would decline, while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Because the current reward-only component is 0.1%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove the fee component of 4.7%. The remaining return would depend on 4.6% and could fall if volume or TVL weakens.
Because the current reward-only component is 0.1%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove the fee component of 4.7%. The remaining return would depend on 4.6% and could fall if volume or TVL weakens.
The risk is material because AVA can move sharply relative to SOL, creating impermanent loss and one-sided inventory. The pool also has $1.1M of liquidity and 0.05x in volume relative to TVL, so exits can become more costly if activity contracts.
The risk is material because AVA can move sharply relative to SOL, creating impermanent loss and one-sided inventory. The pool also has $1.1M of liquidity and 0.05x in volume relative to TVL, so exits can become more costly if activity contracts.
For SOL-AVA, consider exiting when the pool's volume drops materially below $62K, TVL drains from $1.1M, or the fee-based return falls materially below 4.6%. A rapid AVA move toward one-sided inventory is also a practical exit or rebalance signal.
For SOL-AVA, consider exiting when the pool's volume drops materially below $62K, TVL drains from $1.1M, or the fee-based return falls materially below 4.6%. A rapid AVA move toward one-sided inventory is also a practical exit or rebalance signal.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because the snapshot does not provide a recent measured impermanent-loss history or a tick-range history. The position would need to recover that loss through future fee income, currently represented by 4.6%, while relative SOL-AVA prices and trading activity remain supportive.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because the snapshot does not provide a recent measured impermanent-loss history or a tick-range history. The position would need to recover that loss through future fee income, currently represented by 4.6%, while relative SOL-AVA prices and trading activity remain supportive.
