new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT with ai_engine=hold as the stated driver. Ranked #364 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, this is a relatively high placement within the tracked set, but the score does not remove the pool's low recent activity or memecoin concentration risk. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee yield collapsed, external SBR liquidity deteriorated, or sustained volume materially improved the 0.00x ratio.
Computed 2026-09-21 00:35 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$66.56K
Total value locked
$57.09
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -63.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current SOL-SBR price and rebalance when the market reaches roughly 80% of either range boundary; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if fee generation weakens while SBR liquidity is leaving other venues.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $57.09 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-SBR pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2171 of 69219 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5401 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SBR liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SBR into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a portion of the swap fees. Your holdings can change in value and proportion as SOL and SBR prices move, and the pool currently provides no stated reward-based income beyond its fee yield.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 1.7% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 99%, so current yield does not depend on a stated reward emission. Reward support is not quantified, and any future emissions would be subject to decay and possible expiry rather than treated as permanent income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and in-range tick readings are unavailable, so short-term loss behavior and range utilization cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SBR carries wide price-gap risk in SBR, which can produce impermanent loss and reduce fee generation when liquidity or trading activity leaves the pool. Emission decay and incentive expiry are also relevant to exit timing, although the current reward component is 0.0%.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than SBR, which can make SOL price discovery comparatively more orderly. For this LP, a sustained SOL move against SBR changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollSBR Context
SBR is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to determine much of this pool's directional and liquidity risk. A sharp SBR move, thin external liquidity, or declining market interest can increase inventory imbalance, widen effective execution costs, and leave LP capital concentrated in the weaker asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SBR into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a portion of the swap fees. Your holdings can change in value and proportion as SOL and SBR prices move, and the pool currently provides no stated reward-based income beyond its fee yield.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GmQTt7Q7DLKjWJMxbA4CrDbGGFVMRMmech7uaJdeTpYV
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SBR (2HHgCLfK…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
114%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.7% and fee sustainability is 99%. If emissions are added later, decay would reduce the reward portion over time without directly changing fees from trading activity.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.7% and fee sustainability is 99%. If emissions are added later, decay would reduce the reward portion over time without directly changing fees from trading activity.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove a stated reward stream at present. The remaining return would come from 1.7%, while lower incentives could reduce trading activity and liquidity if they had been attracting participants.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove a stated reward stream at present. The remaining return would come from 1.7%, while lower incentives could reduce trading activity and liquidity if they had been attracting participants.
The main risks are SBR price collapse, a sharp SOL-SBR divergence, and a decline in pool liquidity or trading volume. The pool's 0.00x ratio and unavailable recent impermanent-loss history do not establish that fees will offset those risks.
The main risks are SBR price collapse, a sharp SOL-SBR divergence, and a decline in pool liquidity or trading volume. The pool's 0.00x ratio and unavailable recent impermanent-loss history do not establish that fees will offset those risks.
Consider exiting when SBR liquidity is leaving external markets, the pool's TVL is draining, or fee income no longer compensates for the range and price-gap risk. A sustained deterioration in 0.00x or a collapse in 1.7% is a clearer exit signal than a short-lived price move.
Consider exiting when SBR liquidity is leaving external markets, the pool's TVL is draining, or fee income no longer compensates for the range and price-gap risk. A sustained deterioration in 0.00x or a collapse in 1.7% is a clearer exit signal than a short-lived price move.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization data are unavailable. Break-even requires cumulative fees at 1.7% to exceed the position's actual impermanent loss, which depends on the future SOL-SBR path and trading volume.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization data are unavailable. Break-even requires cumulative fees at 1.7% to exceed the position's actual impermanent loss, which depends on the future SOL-SBR path and trading volume.
