new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100 translates into an exit-oriented assessment, not a neutral hold. The live verdict is EXIT because ai_engine is hold, scanner is CRITICAL, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, so its position is weak relative to the tracked set; a sustained increase in trading activity, deeper TVL, improved scanner status, and durable fee generation could change the assessment, while a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.93K
Total value locked
$369.90
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -84.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the current scanner CRITICAL status and live EXIT verdict as the entry filter: if entering despite them, use a narrow range only with a predefined rebalance or exit trigger, and close the position if volume-to-liquidity falls below 0.01x or pool liquidity begins draining.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $369.90 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.92 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GMEx-TENDIES pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4637 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9261 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GMEx-TENDIES liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GMEX and TENDIES into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price difference between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and the pool's current exit assessment signals elevated caution.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the displayed return is fee-derived, so the APR depends on continued volume and liquidity conditions rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available; any change in emissions would therefore require monitoring rather than assuming persistence.
shieldRisk Assessment
The pool's seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and its seven-day tick-in-range history is also not reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GMEX-TENDIES carries high token-price and liquidity-rotation risk, while emission decay can reduce any incentive component and make exit timing more important. A fee-only return does not offset a rapid price move, shallow liquidity, or a withdrawal of trading activity.
tollGMEx Context
GMEX is one side of this liquidity pair, so an LP holds exposure to GMEX while also supplying the inventory needed for swaps. The supplied pool metrics do not establish GMEX's liquidity depth elsewhere. A sharp GMEX price move can increase inventory imbalance and impermanent loss even when fee accrual continues.
tollTENDIES Context
TENDIES is the other side of the pair and contributes the second asset required for LP share pricing and swaps. The supplied metrics do not establish TENDIES' liquidity depth elsewhere. Weak TENDIES liquidity or abrupt price action can increase execution impact, inventory divergence, and the difficulty of exiting without material slippage.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GMEX and TENDIES into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price difference between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and the pool's current exit assessment signals elevated caution.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GrPygTjRJtrk7c4XEAKe4mAzNxxDTsdS9dGaY4QG6Jnk
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GMEx (Xsf9mBkt…)
- Token B
- TENDIES (2M84VE4D…)
- Created
- 9/25/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3%. If emissions decline, the total APR can fall further, although this pool's displayed yield is currently derived from fees rather than rewards.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3%. If emissions decline, the total APR can fall further, although this pool's displayed yield is currently derived from fees rather than rewards.
Because reward contribution is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove the stated fee component of 1.3%, assuming trading activity and liquidity remain unchanged. The pool would then rely entirely on swap fees, with no established reward schedule to support additional yield.
Because reward contribution is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove the stated fee component of 1.3%, assuming trading activity and liquidity remain unchanged. The pool would then rely entirely on swap fees, with no established reward schedule to support additional yield.
Risk is elevated because both assets are MEMECOIN exposure and the pool has a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Price divergence, shallow exit liquidity, and emission decay can outweigh fee income; recent impermanent loss and range history are not reported.
Risk is elevated because both assets are MEMECOIN exposure and the pool has a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Price divergence, shallow exit liquidity, and emission decay can outweigh fee income; recent impermanent loss and range history are not reported.
For this pool, the current live verdict is EXIT, with a CRITICAL scanner signal and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should use a predefined trigger tied to falling volume, declining TVL, worsening price divergence, or a collapse in fee income rather than waiting for incentives to decay fully.
For this pool, the current live verdict is EXIT, with a CRITICAL scanner signal and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should use a predefined trigger tied to falling volume, declining TVL, worsening price divergence, or a collapse in fee income rather than waiting for incentives to decay fully.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fee income at 1.3% can offset the position's actual price divergence before exit.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fee income at 1.3% can offset the position's actual price divergence before exit.
