CLANKER-BOTon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $47.48K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $8.46K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 4.00% fee
- Pool address
- GtmPDVPV…VCWe · observed 2026-10-22
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. Ranked #1417 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, this places the pool in a middle portion of the tracked set rather than establishing a clear entry signal. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume deteriorated, fee-derived APR collapsed, or sustained trading activity improved without a corresponding rise in price risk.
Computed 2026-10-22 15:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$47.48K
Total value locked
$8.46K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 97.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range only while monitoring the pair closely, and rebalance or exit when price leaves the range or when rolling fee APR falls materially below 246.2%; do not leave a concentrated position unattended through a sharp memecoin move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 246.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $8.46K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $338.31 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 CLANKER-BOT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#547 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3024 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CLANKER-BOT liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CLANKER and BOT so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If one token moves sharply against the other, the pool may leave you holding more of the weaker token, and the fees may not fully offset that loss.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 246.2% from swap fees and 253.8% from rewards. 49% of yield is therefore trading-fee-derived, so APR depends on sustained volume and the share of fees captured by LPs rather than a reward schedule. Reward dependency is not established, but the current reward component is zero.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported, and seven-day tick-in-range exposure is also not reported, so recent range efficiency and fee-versus-IL performance cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, CLANKER-BOT remains exposed to abrupt price moves, correlated liquidity exits, and concentrated-liquidity rebalancing costs; exit timing matters because volume and fees can fall quickly after attention shifts.
tollCLANKER Context
CLANKER is one side of this pool and its price movement changes the pool's token composition as concentrated liquidity is traded through. Liquidity depth for CLANKER elsewhere is not provided here, so a sharp move or thinner external markets could increase inventory imbalance and make the LP's fee income insufficient to offset price divergence.
tollBOT Context
BOT is the other side of the pair, with its own memecoin liquidity and price-discovery conditions affecting the position. If BOT moves sharply relative to CLANKER, the LP can accumulate the declining asset while the stronger asset is sold from the range; external BOT liquidity depth is not established by these pool metrics.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CLANKER and BOT so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If one token moves sharply against the other, the pool may leave you holding more of the weaker token, and the fees may not fully offset that loss.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GtmPDVPVepVJjENBNharAsBRLwifdD9PktYVj5f1VCWe
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- CLANKER (7LA4wwjo…)
- Token B
- BOT (BoTx8y9y…)
- Created
- 8/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 253.8%, so emission decay is not presently the source of this pool's APR. The displayed 500.0% is tied to 246.2% in trading fees and will change mainly with volume, fee capture, and liquidity.
The current reward component is 253.8%, so emission decay is not presently the source of this pool's APR. The displayed 500.0% is tied to 246.2% in trading fees and will change mainly with volume, fee capture, and liquidity.
The pool already shows 253.8% from rewards and 49% fee sustainability, so expiry of a reward program would not remove the current reward contribution. Future LP returns would continue to depend on trading fees, including 246.2%, unless incentives are added or changed.
The pool already shows 253.8% from rewards and 49% fee sustainability, so expiry of a reward program would not remove the current reward contribution. Future LP returns would continue to depend on trading fees, including 246.2%, unless incentives are added or changed.
Risk is high relative to a stable or established-asset pair because both tokens can experience abrupt repricing and liquidity withdrawal. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range results are not reported, so the available data does not quantify how well fees have offset that risk.
Risk is high relative to a stable or established-asset pair because both tokens can experience abrupt repricing and liquidity withdrawal. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range results are not reported, so the available data does not quantify how well fees have offset that risk.
Consider exiting or rebalancing when price leaves your chosen range, TVL is draining, volume weakens, or fee-derived returns fall materially from 246.2%. For this pool, a sharp change in CLANKER or BOT liquidity and price behavior is more relevant than waiting for a fixed calendar date.
Consider exiting or rebalancing when price leaves your chosen range, TVL is draining, volume weakens, or fee-derived returns fall materially from 246.2%. For this pool, a sharp change in CLANKER or BOT liquidity and price behavior is more relevant than waiting for a fixed calendar date.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future price paths are unknown. Fees represented by 246.2% are the potential offset, but recovery depends on sustained volume, range placement, and whether the tokens converge again.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future price paths are unknown. Fees represented by 246.2% are the potential offset, but recovery depends on sustained volume, range placement, and whether the tokens converge again.
