new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-OPUS above the Enter threshold of 15/100 only in the sense that the score is being measured, but below the Hold threshold of 20/100 and far below the Exit threshold of 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. At rank #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, it is not among the weakest-ranked pools, but the ranking does not override the unopposed strong EXIT signal: ai_engine=hold and scanner=CRITICAL. The assessment would improve with sustained volume growth, deeper TVL, higher fee generation, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or fee-yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-18 18:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$273.17K
Total value locked
$154.76
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use an exit rule tied to activity rather than APR alone: if the scanner remains CRITICAL and the pool's volume-to-liquidity ratio does not improve from 0.00x, exit or reduce liquidity instead of waiting for fee income to offset the risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $154.76 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-OPUS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3331 of 69219 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7281 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-OPUS liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPUS into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but token prices can change the value of your deposit, and the current activity level may not provide enough fees to justify that risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the displayed return depends on trading activity rather than emissions. Reward timing is not established, so the APR should not be treated as durable if future incentives are introduced and later decay.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also unavailable, so realized range behavior cannot be quantified from the supplied history. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-OPUS carries high token-price divergence risk, shallow-exit risk, and potential emission decay if incentives are added; exit timing matters because liquidity can leave before trading fees compensate for inventory losses.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than OPUS. SOL price moves change the pool's inventory mix; large moves against OPUS can increase the LP's exposure to OPUS and create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollOPUS Context
OPUS is the pool's memecoin leg, so its external liquidity and price discovery should be treated as less reliable than SOL's. A sharp OPUS repricing can leave the LP holding more OPUS after arbitrage, while weak external liquidity can make exiting the position more costly than the displayed fee return suggests.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPUS into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but token prices can change the value of your deposit, and the current activity level may not provide enough fees to justify that risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GtqCTTrhaGCfvsRGa7HvVJ8dN9sNP4YCQvfAc4xWNipZ
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- OPUS (Dxg9cLvs…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
194%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 0.1%, split between 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because reward timing is not established and the pool is a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be assumed to decline unless new incentives are funded.
The current return is 0.1%, split between 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because reward timing is not established and the pool is a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be assumed to decline unless new incentives are funded.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the pool dependent on 0.1% and its $155 in trading activity. With a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio, fee income may be insufficient to compensate LPs for token-price divergence.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the pool dependent on 0.1% and its $155 in trading activity. With a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio, fee income may be insufficient to compensate LPs for token-price divergence.
Risk is elevated because OPUS can diverge sharply from SOL, external liquidity may be limited, and exit conditions can worsen quickly. The pool has a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio and a live EXIT assessment, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable.
Risk is elevated because OPUS can diverge sharply from SOL, external liquidity may be limited, and exit conditions can worsen quickly. The pool has a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio and a live EXIT assessment, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable.
For SOL-OPUS, an exit is justified if the scanner remains CRITICAL, activity fails to improve from 0.00x, or liquidity begins draining from $273K. Waiting for the 0.1% return to offset losses is not a reliable exit plan when OPUS liquidity is uncertain.
For SOL-OPUS, an exit is justified if the scanner remains CRITICAL, activity fails to improve from 0.00x, or liquidity begins draining from $273K. Waiting for the 0.1% return to offset losses is not a reliable exit plan when OPUS liquidity is uncertain.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool produces only 0.1% from $155 of activity against $273K. Any break-even estimate would require observed price divergence, position range data, and sustained fee volume.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool produces only 0.1% from $155 of activity against $273K. Any break-even estimate would require observed price divergence, position range data, and sustained fee volume.
