GMEx-GMEon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $21.64K
- APR
- 70.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $623.67 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 4.00% fee
- Pool address
- GyHtbtm5…JixD · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, produces the live verdict EXIT; the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its position at rank #1623 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it above many ranked pools but does not override the small TVL, variable fee base, and MEMECOIN classification. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee volume collapsed, the fee-funded APR fell sharply, or sustained trading activity and liquidity depth improved enough to reduce exit and range risks.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$21.64K
Total value locked
$623.67
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up70.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 39.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined range and set a rebalance or exit trigger before entry: if price leaves the range or 24-hour fee-producing activity weakens materially relative to $22K, withdraw rather than leaving inactive liquidity exposed to a memecoin repricing.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 70.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 53.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $623.67 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $24.95 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GMEx-GME pools
by AI Farmer Score
#529 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3983 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GMEx-GME liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GMEX and GME into a shared trading pool so others can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price differences between the two tokens can leave you with more of the weaker asset and a lower result than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR decomposes into 53.5% from trading fees and 17.2% from rewards, with 76% of yield attributed to trading fees. Because reward APR is currently absent, the quoted return does not depend on a stated emissions schedule; however, fee income will vary with trading activity and liquidity. Reward dependency is not established, so any future emissions should be treated as additional and potentially decaying rather than permanent yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-in-range history are not reported, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, GMEX-GME is exposed to sharp relative price moves, liquidity withdrawal, and one-sided inventory changes; concentrated liquidity can amplify those effects when price leaves the selected range. Emission decay is a secondary risk here because current reward APR is zero, while exit timing should be based on falling fee flow, worsening liquidity, or a material change in either token's market activity.
tollGMEx Context
GMEX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, so its price movement relative to GME determines whether the position remains in range and which asset accumulates. Liquidity depth for GMEX outside this pool is not provided, so its ability to absorb exits cannot be assessed from these metrics; a sharp GMEX move can increase inventory imbalance and impermanent loss for the LP.
tollGME Context
GME is the other side of the pair, and its relative price action against GMEX drives the pool's range exposure and asset composition. The supplied data does not establish GME's liquidity depth elsewhere, so thin external markets or rapid repricing would be relevant risks for an LP, particularly if trading volume falls while capital remains in the pool.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GMEX and GME into a shared trading pool so others can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price differences between the two tokens can leave you with more of the weaker asset and a lower result than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GyHtbtm5b6fGyQvSknC4zfqVGtLs96XYmptAH3PUJixD
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GMEx (Xsf9mBkt…)
- Token B
- GME (GXqLAGLQ…)
- Created
- 9/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward APR is 17.2%, so the stated 70.7% APR is generated by 53.5% in fees rather than emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could reduce the reward component without directly changing fee income.
Current reward APR is 17.2%, so the stated 70.7% APR is generated by 53.5% in fees rather than emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could reduce the reward component without directly changing fee income.
The current pool reports 17.2% reward APR and 76% fee sustainability, so there is no stated reward stream to expire at present. If incentives are added and later end, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, represented by 53.5%, and could be lower than 70.7%.
The current pool reports 17.2% reward APR and 76% fee sustainability, so there is no stated reward stream to expire at present. If incentives are added and later end, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, represented by 53.5%, and could be lower than 70.7%.
Risk is elevated because this is a MEMECOIN pool with $22K of liquidity and $624 in 24-hour volume. Price shocks, thin external liquidity, withdrawals by other LPs, and concentrated-range exposure can produce losses even when fee income is positive.
Risk is elevated because this is a MEMECOIN pool with $22K of liquidity and $624 in 24-hour volume. Price shocks, thin external liquidity, withdrawals by other LPs, and concentrated-range exposure can produce losses even when fee income is positive.
Set the exit decision before entering: consider withdrawing when price leaves your range, TVL drains, or fee-producing volume no longer compensates for inventory and price risk. For this pool, reassess the position if the fee-funded 53.5% declines materially from the current 70.7% total APR.
Set the exit decision before entering: consider withdrawing when price leaves your range, TVL drains, or fee-producing volume no longer compensates for inventory and price risk. For this pool, reassess the position if the fee-funded 53.5% declines materially from the current 70.7% total APR.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future fee flow is variable. With 76% of yield attributed to fees, break-even depends on cumulative fees exceeding the position's price-divergence loss, not on a fixed schedule.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future fee flow is variable. With 76% of yield attributed to fees, break-even depends on cumulative fees exceeding the position's price-divergence loss, not on a fixed schedule.
