Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 38/100, with Enter 33/100, Hold 44/100, and Exit 50/100. The live verdict is REDUCE, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #491 of 24532 raydium-amm pools. That combination indicates a pool assessed as suitable to monitor or hold under current conditions, not as a uniformly strong entry: fee-funded yield is a positive, while small liquidity, memecoin volatility, and uncertain lifecycle data limit confidence. The assessment would change if TVL drained materially, trading volume weakened enough to reduce 32.1%, or reported yield collapsed; sustained fee generation and deeper liquidity would support a stronger view.
Computed 2026-10-26 15:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$22.45K
Total value locked
$6.31K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up37.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 2.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit rule: withdraw if pool TVL falls by one-quarter from the entry reading or if fee income no longer compensates for the observed price divergence. Because tick-range utilization is unavailable, avoid assuming that a narrow range will remain active and monitor the position after each material PENGU or EGGU move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 37.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 32.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.31K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $15.78 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 PENGU-EGGU pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1144 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2172 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PENGU-EGGU liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PENGU and EGGU into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of your tokens can change when either memecoin moves sharply or when liquidity leaves the pool.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR of 37.9% decomposes into fee-only APR of 32.1% and reward-only APR of 5.7%. Fee sustainability is 85%, so the current yield depends on trading activity rather than reported farm incentives. Reward duration and emission timing are not established, so the fee component should be treated as the primary basis for evaluating ongoing returns.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss figure is unavailable, as is the seven-day tick-in-range reading, so historical loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. PENGU-EGGU is a MEMECOIN pool: rapid price divergence, thin liquidity, liquidity migration, and sharp changes in trading activity can overwhelm fee income. Any emission program may decay or end, making exit timing important even though current reported reward yield is absent.
tollPENGU Context
PENGU is one side of this pool and therefore contributes direct exposure to PENGU price movements, not merely to fee income. Liquidity depth for PENGU elsewhere should be checked separately; a large PENGU move or fragmented liquidity can increase arbitrage-driven rebalancing and impermanent-loss risk for this LP.
tollEGGU Context
EGGU is the other pool asset, so the LP holds exposure to EGGU alongside PENGU and receives fees when the pair trades. Its external liquidity and price behavior should be assessed independently; an EGGU move that is not matched by PENGU will change the inventory mix and can reduce the value of holding both assets compared with holding them separately.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PENGU and EGGU into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of your tokens can change when either memecoin moves sharply or when liquidity leaves the pool.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- H8S3Xm93y6ufMjHJue7XQHh6sAQ8SzQvJGwwNYdRpeCq
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- PENGU (2zMMhcVQ…)
- Token B
- EGGU (49VZNZqv…)
- Created
- 9/18/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reported yield is 37.9%, consisting of 32.1% in fees and 5.7% in rewards. Since rewards currently contribute no reported APR, emission decay is not the present source of yield decline, but any future incentive program could reduce the reward portion as emissions fall.
Current reported yield is 37.9%, consisting of 32.1% in fees and 5.7% in rewards. Since rewards currently contribute no reported APR, emission decay is not the present source of yield decline, but any future incentive program could reduce the reward portion as emissions fall.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero, leaving fee income as the basis for returns. For this pool, that means evaluating whether 32.1% and the 0.28x volume-to-liquidity ratio justify continuing to provide liquidity.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero, leaving fee income as the basis for returns. For this pool, that means evaluating whether 32.1% and the 0.28x volume-to-liquidity ratio justify continuing to provide liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a stable-asset pool because PENGU and EGGU can move sharply, liquidity can migrate, and fee income can change quickly. The pool has $22K in liquidity and $6K in 24-hour volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable.
Risk is high relative to a stable-asset pool because PENGU and EGGU can move sharply, liquidity can migrate, and fee income can change quickly. The pool has $22K in liquidity and $6K in 24-hour volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable.
Use a predefined rule rather than waiting for a large loss: consider exiting if TVL falls by one-quarter, if trading activity no longer supports 32.1%, or if one token begins a sustained move that leaves the chosen range inactive. Also reassess when incentives change, because emission decay can remove part of the expected return.
Use a predefined rule rather than waiting for a large loss: consider exiting if TVL falls by one-quarter, if trading activity no longer supports 32.1%, or if one token begins a sustained move that leaves the chosen range inactive. Also reassess when incentives change, because emission decay can remove part of the expected return.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. A rough assessment would require comparing the position's realized fees, represented by 32.1%, with the actual divergence between PENGU and EGGU over the holding period.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. A rough assessment would require comparing the position's realized fees, represented by 32.1%, with the actual divergence between PENGU and EGGU over the holding period.
