new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-47 in a middling overall position, while Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100 indicate that the model favors maintaining an existing position over opening or closing one. The live verdict is EXIT, and the listed driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1325 of 24532 raydium-amm pools provides broad relative context, but does not offset the pool's low turnover and limited data on range behavior. A sustained TVL drain, further volume deterioration, collapse in fee APR, or newly identified reward dependence would weaken the assessment; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-11-02 12:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$59.58K
Total value locked
$23.20
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined price range and rebalance when the SOL/47 price leaves that range; exit if fee generation weakens alongside a material decline in pool liquidity or swap activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $23.20 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.06 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-47 pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12577 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18339 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-47 liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and 47 into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if either token moves sharply, especially the memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The APR consists of 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with fee sustainability at 100%. Reward dependence is not established, and no reward horizon is provided; the stated return therefore depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. At this activity level, the pool is primarily routed for swaps, not LP yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and the seven-day tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-47 carries sharp price-move and liquidity-contraction risk in the 47 leg, while emission decay is less immediate because current yield is fee-funded. Exit timing matters if trading activity weakens, liquidity drains, or price movement pushes the position outside its intended range.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than 47. A move in SOL against 47 changes the pool balance through rebalancing: sustained SOL strength can leave the LP with relatively more 47, while SOL weakness can create the opposite exposure.
toll47 Context
47 is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine much of the pool's tail risk, although its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics. A sharp move or a decline in external liquidity can increase execution costs, worsen rebalancing conditions, and make exit timing more important for LPs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and 47 into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if either token moves sharply, especially the memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- H9Lp2aVhrsXtHMeYhxXSU2o7AmQW6EEUxKjW19FX612b
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- 47 (HdHqKPz3…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR, so emission decay would affect only that component and could leave total APR closer to 0.0% unless trading activity changes. The reward schedule is not established, while current yield is fee-funded.
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR, so emission decay would affect only that component and could leave total APR closer to 0.0% unless trading activity changes. The reward schedule is not established, while current yield is fee-funded.
Because the stated reward APR is 0.0% and fee sustainability is 100%, the current return is not dependent on a positive reward contribution. If incentives expire, fees would remain the relevant source of LP income, subject to the pool's low swap volume.
Because the stated reward APR is 0.0% and fee sustainability is 100%, the current return is not dependent on a positive reward contribution. If incentives expire, fees would remain the relevant source of LP income, subject to the pool's low swap volume.
Risk is elevated because 47 can move sharply and may have thinner liquidity outside this pool than SOL. With TVL at $60K and volume at 0.00x of liquidity, LPs also face limited fee generation and potentially difficult exits during a liquidity contraction.
Risk is elevated because 47 can move sharply and may have thinner liquidity outside this pool than SOL. With TVL at $60K and volume at 0.00x of liquidity, LPs also face limited fee generation and potentially difficult exits during a liquidity contraction.
For SOL-47, an exit signal would be a sustained drop in liquidity or swap activity, a fee APR that no longer compensates for price divergence, or a price move outside the intended range. A change in the current EXIT assessment would also be relevant if the score drivers deteriorate.
For SOL-47, an exit signal would be a sustained drop in liquidity or swap activity, a fee APR that no longer compensates for price divergence, or a price move outside the intended range. A change in the current EXIT assessment would also be relevant if the score drivers deteriorate.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable. At 0.0% fee APR, recovery depends on actual fee accrual and the future SOL-to-47 price path, so the nominal APR alone is not a break-even estimate.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable. At 0.0% fee APR, recovery depends on actual fee accrual and the future SOL-to-47 price path, so the nominal APR alone is not a break-even estimate.
