new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 is below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. Its live verdict is EXIT, consistent with the scanner's CRITICAL finding and the strong unopposed EXIT signal, despite the ai_engine returning hold. The pool ranks #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, which places it in a weak portion of the tracked set rather than making it a protocol-wide outlier in either direction. The assessment would improve only with sustained fee volume, deeper TVL, and a less severe scanner result; a TVL drain, further volume decline, or collapse in fee yield would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$54.40K
Total value locked
$443.09
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -5.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
For an LP entering this pool, use a narrow monitored range around the current SOL/VAL price and set a rule to exit if the live verdict remains EXIT at the next review or if VAL liquidity visibly deteriorates; do not rely on emissions to justify waiting.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $443.09 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.11 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-VAL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2568 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5240 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-VAL liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and VAL into a shared pool used by traders. You receive a portion of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token, and the current return is low enough that fees alone may not compensate for that risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield consists of 0.7% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, with fee sustainability at 100%. Reward dependency is not established, and no reliable reward-duration figure is available; the current return should therefore be assessed mainly as fee income rather than as an emissions-funded strategy.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss reporting and tick-in-range reporting are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and the portion of time spent in the active price range cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-VAL is exposed to VAL liquidity deterioration, sharp relative price moves, and attention-driven volume decay; emission decay and exit timing should be monitored because there is no confirmed reward schedule to support a long holding period.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a typical memecoin. If SOL moves materially against VAL, the automated market maker will rebalance the position toward the weaker-performing asset, making SOL's price direction relevant to both inventory composition and impermanent loss.
tollVAL Context
VAL is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine the pool's tail risk through its external liquidity, volatility, and persistence of market attention. Before sizing an LP position, compare VAL's liquidity on other venues with this pool's $54K; a sharp VAL decline or fragmented liquidity can leave the LP holding more VAL while fee volume falls.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and VAL into a shared pool used by traders. You receive a portion of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token, and the current return is low enough that fees alone may not compensate for that risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HDvCJkM9LUPYAQUJ37RKTRKAG2AfTATz7xhuCqVwA9jG
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- VAL (DtwN3PHi…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR and 0.7% total APR, so any decline in emissions would reduce the already limited reward component. Because no reward-duration figure is available, the timing of further decay cannot be established; 0.7% is the more relevant stated source of yield.
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR and 0.7% total APR, so any decline in emissions would reduce the already limited reward component. Because no reward-duration figure is available, the timing of further decay cannot be established; 0.7% is the more relevant stated source of yield.
If incentives expire, the reward portion can fall to zero and the return would depend on 0.7% in trading fees. With total APR at 0.7% and fee sustainability at 100%, the position should be evaluated as swap-liquidity exposure rather than assuming emissions will continue.
If incentives expire, the reward portion can fall to zero and the return would depend on 0.7% in trading fees. With total APR at 0.7% and fee sustainability at 100%, the position should be evaluated as swap-liquidity exposure rather than assuming emissions will continue.
The main risks are VAL's price collapse, thin external liquidity, and low trading activity relative to the pool's $54K, reflected by a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so the recent magnitude of those risks cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics.
The main risks are VAL's price collapse, thin external liquidity, and low trading activity relative to the pool's $54K, reflected by a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so the recent magnitude of those risks cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics.
For SOL-VAL, an exit is warranted if the live verdict remains EXIT, if VAL liquidity or market attention deteriorates, or if fee volume no longer supports 0.7%. The current scanner's CRITICAL result and unopposed EXIT signal argue against waiting for an emissions-based recovery.
For SOL-VAL, an exit is warranted if the live verdict remains EXIT, if VAL liquidity or market attention deteriorates, or if fee volume no longer supports 0.7%. The current scanner's CRITICAL result and unopposed EXIT signal argue against waiting for an emissions-based recovery.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's price path is uncertain. At 0.7% annualized fee income, fees would need to persist without a major SOL/VAL divergence for the position to offset its price-related loss.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's price path is uncertain. At 0.7% annualized fee income, fees would need to persist without a major SOL/VAL divergence for the position to offset its price-related loss.
