Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 19/100 places this pool in a weak position: Enter is 10/100, Hold is 30/100, and Exit is 60/100, with the live verdict AVOID. The underlying driver is an ai_engine hold assessment overridden by 85/100 risk and weak yield quality, despite the stated fee APR. The pool ranks #1544 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, so it is not being assessed as a leading alternative within the venue. The assessment would improve if sustained volume increased without a TVL drain, fee yield remained durable, and risk indicators declined; it would worsen with a liquidity withdrawal or fee collapse.
Computed 2026-10-27 00:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.58K
Total value locked
$7.69K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up16.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Before entering, set an exit trigger tied to this pool's conditions: withdraw if TVL begins to drain materially, volume-to-TVL falls below 0.22x, or fee APR drops below 14.9%; do not wait for an emissions change to confirm the deterioration.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 16.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 14.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $7.69K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $19.23 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 TACZ-ZCAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4102 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8650 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the TACZ-ZCAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing TACZ and ZCAT into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but if either token moves sharply against the other, your deposited holdings can be worth less than simply holding the tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported yield decomposes into 14.9% from trading fees and 1.2% from rewards, with 93% of yield attributed to fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the only clearly identified source of return. The total APR should not be treated as durable if volume falls, particularly with a small pool and limited observed turnover.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and current tick-in-range exposure is not reported. As a MEMECOIN pool, TACZ-ZCAT carries substantial price-divergence, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; emission decay can further reduce support for LP returns if incentives change. Thin liquidity can also amplify slippage when either token sells sharply.
tollTACZ Context
TACZ is one side of this pool, so providing liquidity requires exposure to TACZ alongside ZCAT rather than holding TACZ alone. Liquidity depth for TACZ elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; a sharp TACZ move can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss for the LP.
tollZCAT Context
ZCAT is the other pool asset and determines the second half of the LP's market exposure. Liquidity depth for ZCAT elsewhere is not established here, so a rapid ZCAT repricing or difficult exit can increase divergence loss and execution costs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing TACZ and ZCAT into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but if either token moves sharply against the other, your deposited holdings can be worth less than simply holding the tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HXMUEuh1h9NvZodH9yRVwv2PRegC9w3kw8biM9pxFzXH
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- TACZ (3nqHijNU…)
- Token B
- ZCAT (HcRLc9VD…)
- Created
- 9/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is 1.2%, while the total APR is 16.0% and fee APR is 14.9%. Because the identified yield is fee-based, emission decay is not currently the main return source, but any future incentives could decline as emissions change.
The reward component is 1.2%, while the total APR is 16.0% and fee APR is 14.9%. Because the identified yield is fee-based, emission decay is not currently the main return source, but any future incentives could decline as emissions change.
If incentives are present and expire, the total APR should move toward the fee-only figure of 14.9% rather than the current 16.0%. This pool has no established reward-duration data, so the timing of any change cannot be determined from the available metrics.
If incentives are present and expire, the total APR should move toward the fee-only figure of 14.9% rather than the current 16.0%. This pool has no established reward-duration data, so the timing of any change cannot be determined from the available metrics.
The risk score is 85/100, with thin TVL of $35K and a 0.22x volume-to-TVL ratio. TACZ and ZCAT can diverge sharply, while limited liquidity may make exiting costly; recent impermanent-loss history is not available.
The risk score is 85/100, with thin TVL of $35K and a 0.22x volume-to-TVL ratio. TACZ and ZCAT can diverge sharply, while limited liquidity may make exiting costly; recent impermanent-loss history is not available.
For TACZ-ZCAT, an exit is reasonable when TVL drains materially, fee generation falls below 14.9%, or the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates from 0.22x. A sharp move in either token is also a reason to reassess before the position becomes harder to unwind.
For TACZ-ZCAT, an exit is reasonable when TVL drains materially, fee generation falls below 14.9%, or the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates from 0.22x. A sharp move in either token is also a reason to reassess before the position becomes harder to unwind.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Even with fee APR of 14.9%, recovery depends on future trading volume, fee retention, and whether TACZ and ZCAT prices move back toward their prior relationship.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Even with fee APR of 14.9%, recovery depends on future trading volume, fee retention, and whether TACZ and ZCAT prices move back toward their prior relationship.
