new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A 17/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, places this pool on the exit side of the framework. The live verdict is EXIT: ai_engine is hold, but scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a comparatively weak position within the tracked set, consistent with 0.00x Vol/TVL and $28 volume. The assessment would improve only with sustained trading volume, demonstrable fee generation, stable or rising TVL, and evidence that GROW liquidity can support exits; a TVL drain or collapse in fee income would make it worse.
Computed 2026-09-07 10:41 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$48.84K
Total value locked
$28.48
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -15.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use the broadest supported range and set an exit trigger for any continued period at $28 volume or a material TVL drain; do not wait for fee APR to recover without observable trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $28.48 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.07 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-GROW pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1828 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4478 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GROW liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GROW into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You may receive trading fees, but with $28 volume there is currently no observed trading activity generating those fees, and changes in the two token prices can leave you with less value than simply holding them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.1% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100%. Because the reward component is zero, current returns do not depend on an active emissions stream; the available metrics do not establish a reward expiry schedule. With $28 in 24-hour volume, the fee component has no current trading activity supporting it.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent divergence losses and range utilization cannot be measured. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GROW carries emission-decay risk if incentives are introduced and exit-timing risk if GROW liquidity or attention contracts before an LP can leave efficiently. The absence of current volume also increases the risk that fee income remains theoretical rather than realized.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, liquid side of this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a single SOL-GROW pool. For this LP, a SOL price move relative to GROW changes the pool's asset mix and can create divergence loss even if the SOL position itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollGROW Context
GROW is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity depth and price discovery should be assessed beyond this pool rather than inferred from the quoted APR. A sharp GROW repricing, reduced market attention, or fragmented external liquidity can increase divergence loss and make an exit more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GROW into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You may receive trading fees, but with $28 volume there is currently no observed trading activity generating those fees, and changes in the two token prices can leave you with less value than simply holding them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HbChf3aRz1jGb3SgqBkuHRXtPByRn4bdQfSbVaVX3Xt4
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GROW (GoXBgELs…)
- Created
- 8/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
48%
APR
126%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emissions are not contributing to present returns. If rewards are later introduced, emission decay would reduce that component over time while 0.1% would still depend on actual trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emissions are not contributing to present returns. If rewards are later introduced, emission decay would reduce that component over time while 0.1% would still depend on actual trading volume.
Because reward yield is currently 0.0%, expiration would not remove a currently contributing reward stream. Future yield would depend on 0.1%, which is not supported by current $28 volume.
Because reward yield is currently 0.0%, expiration would not remove a currently contributing reward stream. Future yield would depend on 0.1%, which is not supported by current $28 volume.
Risk is high because GROW can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has $49K liquidity and $28 volume. The available data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-utilization history, so those risks cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics.
Risk is high because GROW can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has $49K liquidity and $28 volume. The available data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-utilization history, so those risks cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics.
For SOL-GROW, an exit is warranted when trading activity remains at $28, TVL drains, GROW liquidity deteriorates elsewhere, or the pool's EXIT assessment persists. Waiting for a higher APR is not a sufficient reason to remain when fee generation is unobserved.
For SOL-GROW, an exit is warranted when trading activity remains at $28, TVL drains, GROW liquidity deteriorates elsewhere, or the pool's EXIT assessment persists. Waiting for a higher APR is not a sufficient reason to remain when fee generation is unobserved.
No realistic break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current volume is $28. Any recovery would require future fee income from trading, while the present fee rate is 0.1%.
No realistic break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current volume is $28. Any recovery would require future fee income from trading, while the present fee rate is 0.1%.
